patrick.net

https://www.foxbusiness.com/healthcare/health-care-workers-fired-vaccine-mandate-awarded-10-million-settlement

Health care workers fired over vaccine mandate awarded $10 million in settlement

Illinois health care workers who were fired or otherwise impacted by their hospitals' COVID-19 vaccine mandate will receive a $10 million settlement after filing a lawsuit challenging the rule.

"Let this case be a warning to employers that violated Title VII," Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, the group behind the lawsuit, told the Washington Examiner. "It is especially significant and gratifying that this first classwide COVID settlement protects healthcare workers."

The case centers around workers at NorthShore University HealthSystem, who filed a lawsuit in October 2021 claiming their employer illegally refused to grant any religious exemptions to a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

The settlement approved in the Illinois Northern District Court will result in 473 employees of the system becoming eligible for compensation for being denied a religious exemption to the vaccine mandate, with any of those fired as a result of the rules being eligible for $25,000. The 13 plaintiffs involved in the suit will be eligible for an additional $20,000, while those who complied with the mandate to keep their jobs despite having religious objections will be eligible for $3,000.

zzyzzx says

The case centers around workers at NorthShore University HealthSystem, who filed a lawsuit in October 2021 claiming their employer illegally refused to grant any religious exemptions to a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Unfortunately, this is "religious" rather than based on the fact no one should be forced to take an experimental vaccine for a disease when that disease has an extremely low probability of causing serious injury or death. Using "religion" as an out could be a bad precedence if we have a truly deadly and contagious disease in the future.

Patrick says

$25 million seems way too low for such an egregious violation of basic human rights.

It's worse than not getting a fist bump from a Disney character.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11056259/Black-family-sues-Sesame-Place-alleging-discrimination.html
Parents file $25 MILLION racial discrimination lawsuit against Sesame Street theme park claiming four characters including Rosita ignored their daughter during parade because she's black

Patrick says

https://apnews.com/article/covid-college-football-health-sports-washington-state-cougars-3c1da4b1ca054f459ff87cd81fec2fbb

PULLMAN, Wash. (AP) — Former Washington State football coach Nick Rolovich has filed a claim against the university seeking $25 million for wrongful termination after he was fired last year for refusing to get vaccinated against COVID-19.

$25 million seems way too low for such an egregious violation of basic human rights.

If you want an actual punishment, it would be hanging.

It's fine and dandy somebody gets a few bucks out of this bullshit, but it's better just to end this bullshit but putting heads on stakes and hanging offenders from the lampost until their body clearly is decaying.

That will end this shit for at least a few decades.

It'd be funny if the guys in the costumes are black. Can't even see who they are.

https://patriotpost.us/articles/90624

Alex Berenson Sues the Biden Administration for 1A Infringement
A COVID truth-teller has already prevailed against Twitter, and he has the goods on Team Biden.

Alex Berenson is pale, sweaty, and baggy-eyed, and he looks more like a computer science professor than a crusader for First Amendment rights. And yet here he is, suing the pants off the censors at Twitter and in the Biden White House.

We should be rooting like hell for him.

Berenson is back on Twitter after having been “permanently” banned from the platform for nearly a year because, Twitter claimed, he was spreading “misinformation” about COVID-19. Last week, the former New York Times reporter settled his lawsuit against the hard-left social media company, which admitted its mistake and restored his account.

What sort of “misinformation” was Berenson accused of spreading? What was it that got him the lifetime ban? Oh, irrefutable, evidence-based “misinformation” like this, which he tweeted last August:

It doesn’t stop infection. Or transmission. Don’t think of it as a vaccine. Think of it — at best — as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy and terrible side effect profile that must be dosed IN ADVANCE OF ILLNESS. And we want to mandate it? Insanity.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/lawsuit-filed-rw-malone-vs-wp-company

Lawsuit filed: RW Malone vs. WP Company, LLC

I hope Malone gets every penny the WaPo has.

NCLA Clients Join Missouri and Louisiana Suit Challenging Gov’t-Directed Social Media Censorship
Aug 2, 2022 | Press Releases
Washington, DC (August 2, 2022) – Public statements, emails, and recent publicly released documents establish that the President of the United States and other senior officials in the Biden Administration violated the First Amendment by directing social-media companies to censor viewpoints that conflict with the government’s messaging on Covid-19. Today, the New Civil Liberties Alliance joined the lawsuit, State of Missouri ex rel. Schmitt, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., et al., representing renowned epidemiologists and co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, as well as Dr. Aaron Kheriaty and Jill Hines.

Social media platforms, acting at the federal government’s behest, repeatedly censored NCLA’s clients for articulating views on those platforms in opposition to government-approved views on Covid-19 restrictions. This insidious censorship was the direct result of the federal government’s ongoing campaign to silence those who voice perspectives that deviate from those of the Biden Administration. Government officials’ public threats to punish social media companies that did not do their bidding demonstrate this linkage, as do emails from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to social media companies that only recently were made public.

Government-induced censorship is achieved through a wide variety of mechanisms, ranging from complete bans, temporary bans, “shadow bans” (where often neither the user nor his audience is notified of the suppression of speech), deboosting, de-platforming, de-monetizing, restricting access to content, requiring users to take down content, and imposing warning labels that require click-through to access content, among others. These methods also include temporary and permanent suspensions of disfavored speakers.
This sort of censorship, which strikes at the heart of what the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect—free speech, especially political speech—constitutes unlawful government action. The federal government is deciding whose voices and ideas may be heard, and whose voices and ideas must be silenced. Moreover, this state action deprives Americans of their right to hear the views of those who are being silenced, a First Amendment corollary of the right to free speech. The government’s policy of coercing social-media companies to censor Plaintiffs’ viewpoints should be declared unlawful and halted immediately.

NCLA released the following statements:
“The Biden Administration’s involvement in silencing the voices of those who have critiqued its responses to Covid-19, through pressure exerted on social media companies, is unprecedented in nature and degree. Two of the plaintiffs, Drs. Bhattacharya and Kulldorff, are among the world’s most renowned epidemiologists, and had crucial insights to share on the flawed reasoning and science underlying lockdowns and mask and vaccine mandates. Dr. Kheriaty, a professor of medical ethics, and Ms. Hines, a consumer and human rights advocate, also offered thoughtful, reasoned opposition to government-imposed Covid-19 restrictions. The government’s sweeping campaign to suppress the perspectives of the plaintiffs, and others like them, represents the most severe abrogation of the First Amendment in modern times, and we look forward to seeing this constitutional atrocity rectified in a court of law.”
— Jenin Younes, Litigation Counsel, NCLA
“The government may not work through private entities to accomplish censorship that the First Amendment forbids the government from doing directly. Yet that is precisely what these federal defendants have been up to. NCLA is delighted to join forces with these state attorneys-general to reverse this constitutional outrage and restore free speech to the social media platforms that are today’s public square.”
— Mark Chenoweth, President and General Counsel, NCLA

For more information visit the case page here.
ABOUT NCLA
NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA’s public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans’ fundamental rights.

https://nclalegal.org/2022/08/ncla-clients-join-missouri-and-louisiana-suit-challenging-govt-directed-social-media-censorship/

Mental incapacity will get Biden off.

Patrick says

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/lawsuit-filed-rw-malone-vs-wp-company

Lawsuit filed: RW Malone vs. WP Company, LLC

I hope Malone gets every penny the WaPo has.

It won't matter. Our "news" is outright propaganda for the state. They will be continued to be funded in some way.

Nobody reads the Washington Post or bothers with the NY Times. These outlets exist to give the ILLUSION that people read them. Nobody does. We just have to have the illusion that people believe the BS in these publications.

People do read and believe what is published in WAPO. I know several that do.

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

People do read and believe what is published in WAPO. I know several that do.

How old are they?

There's a whole lost generation, that's Generation X and up..

I'm 51 now. At my age trying to consume "news" is just about impossible. The second I attempt to either watch "news" or read it, immediately my bullshit detector starts screaming at me. I don't know how anybody can NOT see through it, unless they have actively worked against thinking.

richwicks says

How old are they?

One just turned 50. Also believes CNN. One elderly, upper 70's. The other, husband and wife probably early '50's, I guess. This is Maryland, BTW, where there are many DC tit suckers.

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

richwicks says

How old are they?

One just turned 50. Also believes CNN. One elderly, upper 70's. The other, husband and wife probably early '50's, I guess. This is Maryland, BTW, where there are many DC tit suckers.

Talk to some people from the younger generations.

It's weird, OLD people tend to believe in this garbage now, but I think the younger generation is much more aware of what they are reading and seeing. I literally cannot stand to watch MAINSTREAM "news", and I just can't imagine somebody doing it UNIRONICALLY. I mean seriously -


original link


How can anybody watch that? It's just lie, after lie, after lie, after lie. She's been exposed MULTIPLE times, and I'm starting to use this stuff to sniff out if my older friends are worth keeping. Reading a news article today is like reading a kid's book report where he had to write 5 pages, so he stretched and padded the FUCK out of it.

I'm used to reading some pretty dense material when I'm doing it for work. Reading a page is a LOT of work because so much information is stuffed into it. If I try to read something from the NY Times, it's just AGONY. I don't know how anybody can consume it. It seems like such a tremendous waste of time.

The Rachael Maddow clip, she goes on for 4 and 1/2 minutes just repeating the same thing over and over and over again. How can people not lose their MIND watching it?

Back in the day, like 15 yeas ago, she'd explain why the Bush administration was full of shit, and she wouldn't have to repeat herself because they were so full of shit about everything. Such a huge difference between the truth and a lie in media today. People telling you the truth, try to do it quickly, and convincingly and since they aren't lying they are perfectly happy to have their statements challenged.

richwicks says

Talk to some people from the younger generations.

I have two friends in their early to mid-30's. Both from the lower economic class. One is doing much better than his parents, works in industry, has severe TDS, has stated that he'll take as many boosters as necessary, is focused on making money and enjoying pricey and frequent vacations. The other works in non-hard science academia, is doing a little better than his parents, had to take the vax to keep his job, but also was on the brainwashed COIVD bandwagon, but now seems a little more curious. When I began pointing out how many lies were propagated by the MSM to them, they asked what instead they should listern too. So there you have it, there is a need for an interpreter and teller of reality in a significant part of the population.

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

When I began pointing out how many lies were propagated by the MSM to them, they asked what instead they should listern too. So there you have it, there is a need for an interpreter and teller of reality in a significant part of the population.

Give them this:

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/24yVcta8zEjY/

Or the main page:

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/

Now you might want to say "well, ANOTHER guy told me about this, I really don't know much about it", to distance yourself. What I like about him is that he constantly encourages his audience to think and he references all his claims. You're sticking your neck out because anything YOU recommend, they will just assume you believe everything you hear in it.

There's a TON of people that think the world can still be saved, IF we can just educate the population out of their propaganda.

I recognize people's desire for an interpreter, we are trained from birth to "listen to authorities" and we are repeatedly told "the authorities have your best interest at heart" and we are told over and over again "the experts wouldn't be in this position if they weren't the best". NONE of those are true. VERY few people recognize that.

https://www.worthynews.com/77307-federal-judge-orders-protection-for-us-marines-with-religious-objections-to-covid-vaccine-mandate

https://rtmag.co.il/english/breaking-the-israeli-ministry-of-health-has-been-warned-it-might-open-itself-to-lawsuits-for-encouraging-the-public-to-get-vaccinated-while-claiming-that-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-safe,-and-that-side-effects-are-mild-and-transient

Breaking: Researcher appointed by the Israeli MOH to investigate COVID-19 vaccine side effects warned the ministry it could be open to lawsuits for encouraging the public to get vaccinated while claiming that side effects are mild and transient
| 10911 צפיות
In a leaked recording of a Zoom discussion with Israeli Ministry of Health (IMOH) officials, revealed by GB News on Saturday, a researcher hired by the ministry to conduct a study on the side effects of the vaccine can be heard explaining to ministry officials that the findings establish a causal relationship and warning them that they could be exposed to lawsuits. ...

Serious side effects: not rare, not transient
The research team repeatedly stressed during the discussion that their findings indicate that, contrary to what has been thought and claimed so far, in many cases, serious adverse events are long-lasting. An important example is menstrual irregularities – an adverse event on which mountains of reports have accumulated since the launch of the vaccination rollout in December 2020. In one of the slides presented by the researchers in the recorded zoom discussion, the researchers wrote: "Studies carried out on the above mentioned subject noted short-term abnormalities (up to a few days) in the menstrual cycle. However, over 90% of the reports detailing the characteristics of the duration of this adverse event indicate long-term changes (emphasis in the original. Y.S). Over 60% indicate duration of over 3 months". ...

As can be seen from the above slide, the findings reveal that various neurological side effects are likewise not transient but long-lasting. In fact, according to the researchers, most of the reports that referred to their duration state that they lasted for over three months, and a third stated that they lasted for over a year. Similarly, other systemic side effects, such as musculoskeletal injuries, GI problems and kidney and urinary adverse events, are not short and transient.

I hope the Israeli legal system works better than our clown legal system which protect Democrat deep state corruption no matter how many people they kill.

https://www.thecollegefix.com/football-coach-files-25m-wrongful-termination-claim-after-being-fired-for-refusing-covid-vaccine/

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/pfizer-vaccine-whistleblower-responds-motion-dismiss-false-claims-suit

Pfizer cannot use the government as a shield from liability for making false claims about its COVID-19 vaccine, lawyers for a whistleblower argued in response to Pfizer’s motion to dismiss a False Claims Act lawsuit. ...

“Respondents claim fraudulent certifications, false statements, doctored data, contaminated clinical trials, and firing of whistleblowers can be ignored based on the theory that they contracted their way around the fraud,” lawyers for Brook Jackson, who worked as regional director at one of the clinical trials used to develop the Pfizer vaccine, wrote in their Aug. 22 response.

“A drug company cannot induce the taxpayers to pay billions of dollars for a product,” they countered, “that honest data would show poses more risks than benefits, and that ignores the actual contract and the law itself.”

Jackson’s lawsuit alleges that Pfizer and two of its subcontractors violated the False Claims Act by providing bogus clinical trial results to garner the FDA approval of its COVID-19 vaccine.

Under federal law, individuals can sue on behalf of the government and win treble damages if they can prove an individual or company deliberately lied to the government.

One of Jackson’s attorneys, Warner Mendenhall, told The Epoch Times that the payout could be as much as $3.3 trillion.

“It would be enough to bankrupt Pfizer,” Mendenhall said.

Mendenhall, whose law firm has won multimillion-dollar False Claims Act cases, based his estimates on the more than $2 billion the U.S. government has paid Pfizer for more than 100 million doses of its COVID-19 vaccine. ...

While she is seeking compensation for her termination as part of her actions against Pfizer and the other companies, Jackson said she plans to donate any money she receives under her legal action against the companies to those injured by the vaccine.

“As far as I’m concerned, it’s blood money,” she said. “The world should be disgusted by what went on here with the shameful actions behind this dangerous vaccine.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/08/three-california-courts-week-rule-favor-people-newsoms-covid-lockdowns/

https://thepostmillennial.com/nypd-officer-fired-for-maga-ties-files-federal-lawsuit-against-the-department

Lawsuits are outlandishly expensive by design, tedious, take forever, and seldom make whole the depraved situations they are supposed to address. They are unpredictable as well. They are designed predominately to make money for lawyers and preserve the institutions of power, not solve problems in an expeditious manner.

It's great when they 'succeed', but progressives are also ignoring court orders flagrantly, which just requires more forever court.

California is blazing the progressive trail of doing so much illegal and unconstitutional shit, it merely overwhelms by lawfare any remedial mechanisms and proceeds to bureaucratic fiat and astoundingly unconstitutional legislations and edicts. This is the reward of rampant election fraud.

Oberlin loses Appeal, must pay Gibson's Bakery $31M in damages for organizing smear campaign.
https://patrick.net/post/1347249/2022-08-31-hopium-8-30-oberlin-pays-gibson-s

https://slaynews.com/news/bill-gates-indian-high-court-notice-vaccine-death/

Bill Gates Hit with Indian High Court Notice over Vaccine Death

Billionaire Bill Gates has been issued with a notice from the Bombay High Court over a case that alleges the Microsoft co-founder is responsible for deaths related to COVID-19 vaccines.

A petition was filed in the court by a father who said the vaccine killed his daughter, the Hindustan Times reported.

In relation to the case, the High Court also sent a notice to the Indian government (Maharashtra and Union government) and the biopharmaceuticals company Serum Institute of India (SII).

The petitioner, Dilip Lunawat, is seeking Rs 1,000 crore ($125,451,200) compensation after his daughter, Dr. Snehal Lunawat, died after receiving the Covishield vaccine.

Mr. Lunawat blames the government, Bill Gates, and others responsible for spreading misleading information about the vaccine’s safety.

Gates is accused of contributing to the government’s mandates that forced medical professionals to get vaccinated. ...

She was vaccinated with Covishield, which is developed by the SII.

Days later, she suffered severe headaches and vomiting and was rushed to a hospital.

Doctors found she was bleeding in her brain, the petition said.

Lunwat says his daughter died as a result of side effects from the vaccine on March 1. ...

The petitioner has also sought a response from Gates, whose organization – the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – had partnered with the SII to accelerate the process of manufacturing to deliver 100 million doses of the vaccine.

He also sought a response from the Union government, Maharashtra government, and the Drug Controller General of India.

Lunwat says he is seeking justice for his daughter and “many more people who are likely to be murdered” due to similar cases of adverse effects, according to the petition.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/wrongful-death-lawsuit-filed-three-california-hospitals-using-remdesivir-covid-19-treatment-without-informed-consent/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/christian-bakers-fined-for-gay-wedding-cake-refusal-take-case-back-to-us-supreme-court/

A little democide here, a little genocide there, and they get their feathers all ruffled over hospitals making a few bucks on the scheme.
https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/17902

https://100percentfedup.com/maine-parental-rights-advocate-wins-huge-victory-against-woke-school-board/

A father and parental rights advocate won a major lawsuit against Maine Regional School Unit (RSU) after he was banned from the school district’s facilities for reading an obscene book that was in the school district’s own library.

After Shawn McBreairty, a father of two spoke out at his daughter’s own high school over the introduction of obscene books, parents from around the state asked him to speak up on behalf of their children.

After reading an obscene book in RSU’s libraries that described detailed sex teens between two underaged boys, the district banned him for obscenity.

McBreairty sued the school district for violating his first amendment rights and won $40,000.

Parents around the country have been pushing back against obscene books that push radical gender ideology and critical race theory on to children.

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/i/73773542/vaccine-damage-to-health-compensation-for-a-year-old-euros-per-month-for-years

Vaccine damage to health. Compensation for a 16 year old: 750 euros per month for 15 years
September 16, 2022

T., aged 16, will be compensated by the state for the permanent damage of an autoimmune thrombocythemia caused by a dose of the anti Covid vaccine. And he will be entitled to 750 euros per month for 15 years.

In Italy. It's not nearly enough.

More than billion people were coerced by governments around the world to inject something they did not have and could not have informed consent about, which turns out to be extremely dangerous, for a disease which is not at all dangerous unless you're just about to die anyway.

https://reclaimthenet.org/fact-checkers-lawsuits/

September 20, 2022
Fact-checkers complain they’re constantly hit with lawsuits

Online fact checkers have great authority over what speech gets suppressed on mainstream social media platforms and a fact-check of a post on Facebook can result in that post being suppressed by as much as 95%.

Yet, despite their great power over what people can say, fact checkers are also increasingly frustrated at calls for more transparency about the way they operate and say they are being bombarded with freedom of information act (FOIA) requests and lawsuits. ...

GOOD.

NYC police win suit.



https://nitter.pussthecat.org/NYCPBA/status/1573404729644027904#m

https://www.wsj.com/articles/nypd-officers-cant-be-fired-for-refusing-covid-19-vaccine-judge-rules-11663971932?mod=e2tw

https://reclaimthenet.org/california-sued-youtube-censorship/

Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit against California’s Secretary of State for making YouTube censor a video on election integrity posted weeks before the November 2020 election.

On September 22, 2020, Judicial Watch posted a video on election integrity on YouTube, titled: “**ELECTION INTEGRITY CRISIS** Dirty Voter Rolls, Ballot Harvesting & Mail-in-Voting Risks!” In the 26-minute video, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton discussed election topics like ballot harvesting, changes in states’ election procedures, vote-by-mail processes, and failures by states to update voter rolls.

The lawsuit alleges that the California Office of Elections Cybersecurity (OEC), overseen by California’s State Secretary Shirley Weber, contacted Google to have the video removed. The suit accuses Weber and her office of violating Judicial Watch’s First Amendment and other rights.

We obtained a copy of the complaint for you here.

According to records, on September 24, 2020, OEC’s social media coordinator Akilah Jones sent an email to Google to report the video.

“I am reporting the following video because it misleads community members about elections or other civic processes and misrepresents the safety and security of mail-in ballots. Thank you for your time and attention on this matter,” Jones wrote in the email.

A Google/YouTube representative replied to Jones on September 25, saying they would look into it. Later that day, the video was removed. Two days later, the Google/YouTube representative confirmed to Jones that the video had been removed for violating the platform’s policies.

According to the lawsuit, Weber and the OEC violated Judicial Watch’s First and Fourteenth Amendments, and civil rights established in the state of California’s constitution.

“Smoking gun documents show California government officials, who were being advised by the Biden campaign PR operation, caused YouTube to censor a key Judicial Watch video just before the 2020 election,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “This egregious government censorship and election interference violated Judicial Watch’s civil rights, and our lawsuit seeks to stop and expose the growing corruption of leftist government officials colluding with Big Tech allies to attack the free speech rights of Americans.”

Patrick says

California’s State Secretary Shirley Weber

https://notthebee.com/article/this-mom-in-michigan-is-suing-her-local-school-board-for-reporting-her-to-the-feds-after-she-spoke-out-against-covid-policies

A Michigan mom is suing the Chippewa Valley School Board for violating her First Amendment rights. Sandra Hernden, with the help of the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation, is taking legal action after facing retaliation from members of the school board. Hernden spoke out against the district's COVID-19 policies, and district officials responded by reporting her to her employer and then to the Department of Justice.

Hernden is a police officer and mom of three boys. When the Chippewa Valley School District turned to remote instruction in spring 2020 in response to COVID-19, Hernden witnessed the toll it took on her children, particularly her son with special needs. Without the in-person assistance and individualized attention that he once had, his grades plummeted. He suffered socially, too. When the board decided the schools would stay virtual in fall 2020, she knew she had to fight for her son.

"For two years, I have been demoralized, humiliated, discredited and demeaned," said Sandra Hernden. "I can live with a lot of things and be called a lot of names, but none of this will stop me from fighting for my children. I'm bringing this case not just for my family, but for all the families like me who feel they have no voice."

This woman – who is a police officer and special needs mom – was persecuted because she disagreed with the school board's insane policies.

Could you imagine telling Americans 10 years ago that they'd be reported and investigated by the FBI for free speech at school boards?

And for voicing anger at policies that are hurting their children, no less??

https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/brook-jackson-fraud-suit-news?publication_id=295776&post_id=76554734&isFreemail=true

A few weeks ago Liam Sturgess and I had the opportunity to talk with Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson and one of her attorneys about her lawsuit against Pfizer, which is potentially the largest lawsuit in history in dollar terms. There are a lot of recent updates on the suit, which you can follow at her Twitter account.

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/iambrookjackson

... Will The Federal Government Allow This Trial?
That's no small question. If the government has a plan, that plan will dictate how far this case goes. The government could have simply disallowed the case, but it was allowed to proceed.

Now we're at the point at which a judge is deciding whether to accept Pfizer's motion to dismiss the trial. ...

https://nypost.com/2022/10/05/staten-island-firefighter-timothy-rivicci-canned-over-covid-19-vax-mandate-gets-job-back-after-judges-decision/

In theory it sounds great that lawsuits are the answer...

But in practice a lawsuit rarely works since a lot of times you need lots of money for the lawsuit to go anywhere

If you have a good case, lawyers will take it for a modest cut of the winnings, like 50%.

Patrick says

If you have a good case, lawyers will take it for a modest cut of the winnings, like 50%.

Minus 'expenses' taken out of your cut LOL!

Patrick says

If you have a good case, lawyers will take it for a modest cut of the winnings, like 50%.

More like 99%.

The reality is that the government knows a lawsuit is expensive, and they use that to their advantage. They assume most people won't attempt to spent the time, much less money, to hold them accountable, and they are 100% right.