patrick.net

“your mask protects me” was a wonderful soundbite to shift responsibility for my superstitious anxiety to you. but it never had ANY basis in fact. ...

even as efficacy claims fell to pieces, the masqueraders fell back to this position:

“it’s really not a big deal. do it for me. even if it works a little or makes people feel better, where is the harm? why not try?”

but even this has fallen to pieces. masks wrecked schools and learning. they also impeded the social and verbal development of infants and toddlers. ...

what if masks really were making everyone quite a lot worse off and unable to concentrate because they were getting too much CO2?

because it’s sure starting to look like they did. frequent sounding board and gatopal™ andrew bostom (professor at brown university med school and a rare beacon of principled reason at the gato alma mater) explains here...

but like so many other things covid, all this past knowledge was not only ignored but inverted, especially with regard to children who have been subjected to masking rules no workplace would have been permitted to implement before 2020.

and based on this data, they really bore the brunt of it.




... interestingly, this CO2 study may provide the answer to another of the interesting issues of masking and infection: surgeons who wear them during surgery wind up with higher rates of post op infection in their patients.

Daniela Jampel
@daniela127

Yesterday my toddler threw up at school. I was there to pick her up and saw it happen. Because we have TheNYCScience™️, she was wearing a mask. Yes you read that correctly she THREW UP IN HER MASK.

I have a picture but it is actually too disgusting to share. You're welcome.
May 18, 2022

Masking was the single most common non-pharmaceutical intervention in the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Most countries have implemented recommendations or mandates regarding the use of masks in public spaces. The aim of this short study was to analyse the correlation between mask usage against morbidity and mortality rates in the 2020-2021 winter in Europe. Data from 35 European countries on morbidity, mortality, and mask usage during a six-month period were analysed and crossed. Mask usage was more homogeneous in Eastern Europe than in Western European countries. Spearman's correlation coefficients between mask usage and COVID-19 outcomes were either null or positive, depending on the subgroup of countries and type of outcome (cases or deaths). Positive correlations were stronger in Western than in Eastern European countries. These findings indicate that countries with high levels of mask compliance did not perform better than those with low mask usage.

A parallelization analysis based on county-level data showed that in Kansas, counties with mask mandate had significantly higher case fatality rates than counties without mask mandate, with a risk ratio of 1.85 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.51–2.10) for COVID-19-related deaths. Even after adjusting for the number of “protected persons,” that is, the number of persons who were not infected in the mask-mandated group compared to the no-mask group, the risk ratio remained significantly high at 1.52 (95% CI: 1.24–1.72). By analyzing the excess mortality in Kansas, this study determines that over 95% of this effect can solely be attributed to COVID-19.

These findings suggest that mask use might pose a yet unknown threat to the user instead of protecting them, making mask mandates a debatable epidemiologic intervention.

The cause of this trend is explained herein using the “Foegen effect” theory; that is, deep re-inhalation of hypercondensed droplets or pure virions caught in facemasks as droplets can worsen prognosis and might be linked to long-term effects of COVID-19 infection.

The Gray Lady (quietly) concedes that masks have zero impact on COVID
And if the NYTimes were a real newspaper, dedicated to the truth, and public good, it would be HEADLINING that "discovery," to get all those STILL wearing masks to TAKE THEM OFF!

Once upon a time, the DOJ, said it would appeal a judges ruling against mandatory mask wearing on airplanes if the CDC asked it to. Well, the CDC asked the DOJ to appeal and the DOJ said it would.

It seems that settled science (political science) has trumped this stance as it seems this case has been put to the wayside.

The DOJ is supposed to be apolitical. Just add this to the Department of Jokes memes.

They must've heard me bitching and filed. They still don't deserve a paycheck.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/justice-department-appeals-mask-mandate-ruling-but-here-s-why-it-won-t-matter-to-you-for-now/ar-AAXYKXy?li=BBnbklE

We still see the people wearing N-95s while walking in the park.
At this point I just kind of pity their mental disease.

“Our data indicate that children are at far greater risk of critical illness from influenza than from COVID-19.” Source (JAMA Network)

“Children and young people remain at low risk from COVID-19 mortality.” Source (OSF PrePrint)

“…children are not the main drivers of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.” Source (CMAJ Group)

Children rarely transmit infection to others and more frequently have an asymptomatic or mild course compared to adults. Source (Journal of Medical Virology)

Asymptomatic spread in long-exposure, household settings was less than 1%. Source (JAMANetwork)

“…could not provide evidence for a relevant asymptomatic spread… in childcare facilities… in a low nor a high prevalence setting.” Source (MedRxIV)

“For adults living with children there is no evidence of an increased risk of severe COVID outcomes” Source (MedRxIV)

Increased household exposure to kids was associated w/ a smaller risk of testing positive or hospitalization w/ Covid Source (MedRxIV)

“…we did not note any association between mask use and risk…” Source (The Lancet)

“Evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-medical face masks for the prevention of COVID-19 is scarce.” Source (ECDC)

“…people must not touch their masks, must change their single-use masks frequently or wash them regularly…” Source (BMJ)

The effectiveness of high-grade masks for flue was linked to correct usage. Source (NIH)

Children have a lower tolerance to wearing masks and may fail to use them properly. Source (ECDC)

“…household use of face masks is associated with low adherence and is ineffective for controlling seasonal respiratory disease.” Source (EID)

“…it’s difficult for some autistic people to wear masks because of sensitivity issues,” Source (OAR)

Deaf and Disabled children can feel isolated from other children and adults who are wearing masks. Source (The Guardian)

“Extended mask-wearing by the general population could lead to relevant effects and consequences in many medical fields.” Source (MDPI)

“Psychosocial, biological, and immunological risks for children and pupils…” Source (BMJ)

School masks: face coverings could damage children’s speech development, warn scientists. Source (The Telegraph)

“…wearing masks throughout the day can hinder language and socio-emotional development, particularly for younger children.” Source (AAP)

A database tracking mask mandates has seen no clear benefit to masking children Source (Qualtrics Dashboard)

“…the data shows that districts’ face covering policies do not impact the spread of the virus,” Source (FL Education Board)

Delta does not seem to change the game No difference in risk of hospitalisation between Delta variant and Alpha Source (MedRxIV)

The viral dynamics of the Delta variant are similar to those of Alpha. Source (MedRxIV)

Studies in favor of school masking have been extremely flawed North Carolina study without a control group.Source (WSJ)

CDC (MMWR) studies have numerous flaws. Source (Thread)

We’ll get into the details shortly, but the conclusion gives a fantastic overview of the results:

While no cause-effect conclusions could be inferred from this observational analysis, the lack of negative correlations between mask usage and COVID-19 cases and deaths suggest that the widespread use of masks at a time when an effective intervention was most needed, i.e., during the strong 2020-2021 autumn-winter peak, was not able to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Moreover, the moderate positive correlation between mask usage and deaths in Western Europe also suggests that the universal use of masks may have had harmful unintended consequences.

The paper’s stated most important finding: “... contrary to the accepted thought that fewer people are dying because infection rates are reduced by masks, this was not the case … Results from this study strongly suggest that mask mandates actually caused about 1.5 times the number of deaths or ~50% more deaths compared to no mask mandates.” The study theorized that the so-called “Foegen effect,” whereby hypercondensed droplets caught by masks are re-inhaled and introduced deeper into the respiratory tract, could be responsible for the increased Covid mortality rate.

I am at Bush airport N of Houston. Federal checkpoints have "masks mandatory" signs with officers wearing them. Over 95% of diverse Texans dont and just ignore the signs. Officers dont say anything.
A few older and infirm people are the only ones wearing masks. In contrast, my wife returned recently from Minneapolis and it is infected with maskholes.

I think we are separating more and more into two different countries.

David Anber, Criminal Lawyer 🇨🇦
@DavidAnber
15h
It’s hilarious when the mask-obsessed finally realize that there’s no rhyme or reason to mandatory mask rules.

Don S. Dizon MD 🇬🇺
@drdonsdizon
Jul 4
Recalling my recent trip via #pearsonairport in #Toronto. Security made me change masks- paper mask mandated. No others allowed...including N95. 😐and no one could explain the rationale. #covid19

These findings suggest that mask use might pose a yet unknown threat to the user instead of protecting them, making mask mandates a debatable epidemiologic intervention.

Carbon dioxide rises beyond acceptable safety levels in children under nose and mouth covering: Results of an experimental measurement study in healthy children
Environ Res. 2022 Sep; 212: 113564. 2022 May 28. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113564

This shocking paper had no coverage by the state-sponsored media, even though it shows that the average CO2 levels in inhaled air with nose and mouth coverings in children between age 6 and 17 is well beyond acceptable levels. ...

In conclusion we have produced experimental data that show that carbon dioxide content in inhaled air rises on average to 13,000 to 13,750 ppm no matter whether children wear a surgical or an FFP2 mask. This is far beyond the level of 2,000 ppm considered the limit of acceptability and beyond the 1,000 ppm that are normal for air in closed rooms. This estimate is rather on the low side, as we only measured this after a short time without physical exertion. Decision makers and law courts should take this into consideration when establishing rules and guidance to fight infections.