patrick.net

It’s killing the more frail oldsters. John Baker died the other day, one day after being vaccinated. He was a cancer survivor with a weakened immune system which is why he took the vaccine. Turns out it wasn’t so safe and now he’s gone. At least he did some good in his life, founding Celebrate Recovery which has helped 100s of thousands to sobriety.

Her symptoms indicate a severe auto immune response with her body attacking itself. I have never had any vaccine do that. They might leave me a bit peaked for a few days at worst. The first shot sets up the bowling pins, the second shot STEEE-Rike.

Strange, you strike fear and panic into people and then promise them a 'cure' that is worse than the disease. The Globalist maniacs are on a roll.

Yum!

Reminds me of a comparative anatomy lab I signed up for on Saturdays at 8AM. I always showed up hung over as fuck before I dug into cats, sheep testicles, stuff like that.

Those were the good ol' days lol...

DO NOT TAKE THE SHOT, ANOTHER DOCTOR CALS IT WHAT IT IS A HOAX!!!

"https://www.bitchute.com/video/7frcOk0nHvJw/"

That shows us where the Flu went.

Has anybody heard about the lack of covid-19 sample?

It's a virus. Shouldn't your be able to cough on a petri dish and incubate it?

Second report from an older friend in Santa Cruz. He said he had the second shot and so far not bad. However, he said his sister had the second shot and had a very similar negative response: very sore arm at injection site, weakness, lots of pain in muscles and joints, stiff neck, lack of coordination, very unpleasant and was ill for a few days this way. Does it affect women more than men? I already told my friend I wasn't going to take it, so I wonder if he just wants to feel that his choice was OK and that he will be better for it. He didn't even mention the sore arm, which seems to be a standard complaint.

More news from first lady: still sick four days later, aching everywhere with joint & muscle pain continuing, not going out much.

Ceffer says

More news from first lady: still sick four days later, aching everywhere with joint pain continuing, not going out much.

Yes, but importantly, can she still work in the kitchen?

HeadSet says

Yes, but importantly, can she still work in the kitchen?

Sadly, when she can no longer fetch coffee, she'll just have to be put down.

Onvacation says

DO NOT TAKE THE SHOT, ANOTHER DOCTOR CALS IT WHAT IT IS A HOAX!!!

"https://www.bitchute.com/video/7frcOk0nHvJw/"

@Rb6d Does this sound possible to you?

From https://web.archive.org/web/20210213014002/https://www.globalresearch.ca/clinical-lab-scientist-covid-19-fake-wake-up-america/5737013 I see that that doctor's name is supposedly Dr. Derick Knauss but I cannot find any record of such a virologist.

This Irish reporter claims that she cannot get any documentation which proves that Wuhan Virus exists:

https://gemmaodoherty.com/

https://gemmaodoherty.com/defending-our-freedoms/the-truth-about-the-covid19-scamdemic/

https://principia-scientific.com/irish-government-admits-covid-19-does-not-exist/

Also interesting:

https://telegra.ph/Virus-Wunder---Covid-19-does-not-exist-11-15

In one of its own documents, the CDC (US Epidemic Control Board) states quite clearly: "Since no quantified virus isolates of 2019 nCoV are currently available, only diagnostic tests for the detection of 2019 nCoV RNA have been tested with characterized populations of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA...". If this is the case, in the absence of quantified virus isolates, how can we be sure that what is being determined is actually COVID-19?

We have saved the document "CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel" for you here: EUA-CDC-Panel-ifu.pdf
Page 39: Performance Characteristics
The crucial sentence "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available..." is hidden far back in the document on page 39, in a section titled "Performance Features".

But any object that exists can be quantified, that is, measured. The use of the term "quantified" in this sentence means: the CDC has no detectable amount of the virus because it is not present.

Another indication is the use of the word "isolate". This means that no isolated virus is present.

Another way of expressing it: The pandemic is a fraud!

Nobody has an isolated sample of the Covid-19 virus....

Nobody has ever proven its existence!

As if this were not already a revelation, the CDC continues to write that it is submitting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus (which has not been isolated)... and the test looks for RNA that is believed to be from the virus whose existence has not been proven.

And with this test, the CDC and every other health authority in the world counts Covid cases and deaths... and governments have used it as a basis for lockdowns and economic devastation, using these case and death figures as justification. The question is obvious: If doctors are actually treating patients who they believe have what they call Covid-19, what are they actually treating?

Don't confuse claims, assumptions and presumptions with science

Those who now believe "you have the virus but it is not available", or "you have the virus but it is buried in other material and has not been extracted and purified and isolated", also believe that vaccinations protect against disease, although this has never been scientifically proven, or even refuted by the large WHO vaccination study. What is regularly sold to us as science is all too often based on conjecture or speculation. Louis Pasteur already had two diaries: in one he wrote down the results of his vaccination trials as he would have liked them to be and in the other he noted down the actual results, as Prof. Geison of the University of Princeton reports. More about this here: Louis Pasteur committed science fraud.

US epidemic control authority manipulated already in the past

The CDC investigated a possible link between vaccinations and the occurrence of autism. When the study's statistics showed alarming results, the CDC manipulated the numbers to prove the safety of the vaccines, as revealed by whistleblower Dr. William Thomson, whose report you will find in this documentation.

PCR test cannot detect virus

The lawyer Dr. Reiner Füllmich pointed out that the PCR test developed by Dr. Drosten does not stand up to scientific criteria - according to his statement Drosten cobbled together the PCR test on the computer without ever having seen the virus. However, the worldwide devastating measures are based almost exclusively on the PCR test marketed by Drosten. In recent years, Dr. Drosten repeatedly attracted attention by predicting epidemics with millions of deaths, which then never arrived, but apparently contributed to the German government buying vaccines for millions, which then had to be destroyed because the independently thinking citizen recognized the fraud and regularly rejected the vaccinations.

In this video Reiner Füllmich reports about the cooperation of the CDU, vaccine manufacturers, WHO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Dr. Drosten.

Patrick says

@Rb6d Does this sound possible to you?

I think y'all are just a tad too conspiratorial. Simplest explanation of corona crap is that PTB's needed an excuse to crash economy to remove Trump, which is what they did with an onset of a somewhat severe seasonal cold. Whether it was made in a Chinese lab or was a natural virus escaping I don't know - asked a few scientist friends of mine and they also were uncertain. About vaccine, some people have reaction against flu vaccine as well, and corona vaccine is rather new and untested one, so side effects check out.

Thanks!

What do you think of the article I'm quoting here:

https://patrick.net/post/1338280/2021-02-28-wuhan-virus-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless

Are the PCR tests meaningless for diagnostic purposes?

Is there really no purified sample of the virus to work from, and if so, why not?

Rb6d says

I think y'all are just a tad too conspiratorial. Simplest explanation of corona crap is that PTB's needed an excuse to crash economy to remove Trump, which is what they did with an onset of a somewhat severe seasonal cold.

LOL! That's not a conspiracy?

Patrick says

This Irish reporter claims that she cannot get any documentation which proves that Wuhan Virus exists:

Interesting. That would explain why J&J uses a substitute, but does not explain where J&J gets the SARS-CoV-2 genetic material.

Unlike the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, which use an mRNA design, the Johnson & Johnson shot uses a harmless adenovirus — a type of virus that typically causes the common cold — modified with the genetic material for SARS-CoV-2 to trigger an immune response.

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/02/scicheck-a-guide-to-johnson-johnsons-covid-19-vaccine/

Sounds like even if the Johnson and Johnson has limited effectiveness, it may be a bit safer than the mRNA bio agents.

Ceffer says

LOL! That's not a conspiracy?

That's a conspiracy fact, not a conspiracy theory

Patrick says

Are the PCR tests meaningless for diagnostic purposes?

this is a somewhat outside of my specialty and I think there is a Patnetter who knows more that me in bio-related things, but my understanding is that if PCR tests are not run correctly, they will give too many false positives. Conveniently, testing instructions (sensitivity level) were changed after Bidet was elected, thus removing those false positives

Rb6d says

Patrick says

Are the PCR tests meaningless for diagnostic purposes?

this is a somewhat outside of my specialty and I think there is a Patnetter who knows more that me in bio-related things, but my understanding is that if PCR tests are not run correctly, they will give too many false positives. Conveniently, testing instructions (sensitivity level) were changed after Bidet was elected, thus removing those false positives

They can give false negatives too and hell yes they're used for diagnostics. I worked on a liquid biopsy team that had a superb method of detecting cancer DNA. It takes time to design and develop the test though and you need non-morons to do that.

Just like any of these sorts of tests there's a dynamic range where it's accurate. Too little (or sometimes just missing DNA because of sampling error) or too much can result in errors. So they are validated, that range is set and so long as you're in that range they're about the best technology out there for this sort of testing.

If the WHO were recommending 40 PCR cycles that's excessive in my opinion. I've commonly used 30-35 which is a lot less chance for an error because amp is exponential (part of it is anyway) and the DNA can spontaneously mutate in the tube.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/why-new-covid-cases-are-crashing

WHO recommends reducing cycles in PCR test - covid cases drop.

It's a hoax.

@just_passing_through I don't know your exact occupation, but do you think there is no purified sample of Wuhan Virus, and if there is none, is this unusual?

Also, I've seen complaints that "Koch's Postulates" for confirming that the supposed virus causes disease have not been satisfied. Think that's true?

Patrick says

do you think there is no purified sample of Wuhan Virus, and if there is none, is this unusual?

Not unusual at all. Actually most things can't be grown in petri dishes, etc., and if we can't grow things up and make a lot of them it's hard to isolate them. Maybe nearly impossible.

About 10 years ago when I was working at illumina and we'd been releasing cheap, disruptive dna reading machines which changed biotech a new field started to explode: meta-genomics

Customers were finding many (dozens?) bacteria for example that live on human faces and only human faces. After all this time nobody had noticed them yet they were there.

They were 'discovered' by their genomes. You don't have to isolate something to read it's genome.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54011/

"By making microbes visible, the invention of microscopes in the late 18th century made us aware of their existence. The development of laboratory cultivation methods in the middle 1800s taught us how a few microbes make their livings as individuals, and the molecular biology and genomics revolutions of the last half of the 20th century united this physiological knowledge with a thorough understanding of its underlying genetic basis. Thus, almost all knowledge about microbes is largely “laboratory knowledge,” attained in the unusual and unnatural circumstances of growing them optimally in artificial media in pure culture without ecological context. The science of metagenomics, only a few years old, will make it possible to investigate microbes in their natural environments, the complex communities in which they normally live. It will bring about a transformation in biology, medicine, ecology, and biotechnology that may be as profound as that initiated by the invention of the microscope."

Patrick says

Also, I've seen complaints that "Koch's Postulates" for confirming that the supposed virus causes disease have not been satisfied. Think that's true?

I don't know much about this and have no opinion.

A lot of people, 'roll their own', pcr tests. For an example of well-built pcr tests Applied Biosystems is a good example. I worked for them back before Thermo bought them.

https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/life-science/pcr/real-time-pcr/real-time-pcr-assays.html

Some products they sell:

Virology
- Detect specific viruses and verify targets involved in the immunological response to viral infection
- Predesigned assays address host genes implicated in SARS-CoV-2 research including viral entry factors, chemokines and other targets

Immunology
- Discover and verify immunological pathways and biomarkers
- Predesigned assays and arrays address common targets in human, mouse and rat hosts

That being said, many 'lab's these days don't have to go through a whole lot to develop what are called LDTs (lab developed tests) that the FDA doesn't scrutinize so much as say a drug. You basically just have to validate it, say what you're going to do then do what you said you'd do. That's it. Sort of a loophole. These work very well.

As for covid, yeah, always sounded sloppy to me and perhaps spiked-to-fail/scam.

I still can't decide if the virus thing is a complete fraud or not.

I'm confident that it's at least a partial fraud designed to take down the economy and therefore Trump after impeachment and removal failed in January of 2020. And that the WHO is now fucking with test standards to bring down cases to benefit Bezos/Biden/China.

Patrick says

complete fraud

One former student of mine works with it, I think they even sequences the virus. So it can't be a complete fraud, just a partial one.

I got my first shot (moderna) yesterday. So far, its only sore where they poked me. I take my second shot 30 days from now. I'm 68-years-old and a disabled veteran. I work in a VA Hospital, around patients. I have to take the vaccination or I can't work with patients. Our nurses tell me the second shot is the hard one to take.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10159159762134507&id=351086129506

MAGA says

Our nurses tell me the second shot is the hard one to take.

Yes. My sister just got her 2nd shot last week. Mind you she has lupus, but she said the reaction was pretty bad and she's still feeling exhausted. I'm not touching the stuff and don't have to.

There's clearly a large amount of false positive/negatives. If we cannot get an accurate test of the actual virus, I really don't understand how there can be a vaccine. Hated biology, but numbers don't lie and if we can't test correctly I'm not taking it.

MAGA says

I have to take the vaccination or I can't work with patients

Why?
It doesn't give you immunity and they can't force you to take an experimental biologic agent. It's not a vaccine and it won't protect you or your patients.

MAGA says

take my second shot 30 days from now.

That’s better. Sources have found that taking the second shot too soon after the first leads to more severe symptoms. Better to space it out a bit.

stfu says

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/why-new-covid-cases-are-crashing

WHO recommends reducing cycles in PCR test - covid cases drop.

It's a hoax.

@just_passing_through what do you think of this? Do you think the WHO making this change will result in fewer cases?

@Hircus, if WHO had instructed them prior to this to use 40 then yeah, they set up a lot of false positives. Dropping to 35 will definitely result in fewer 'cases'.

https://www.khou.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/vaccine/covid-vaccine-side-effect-false-cancer-screenings/285-865a9739-f0b3-4616-b24a-87f08517f0cf

COVID-19 vaccine side effect causing false positive cancer screenings

zzyzzx says

https://www.khou.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/vaccine/covid-vaccine-side-effect-false-cancer-screenings/285-865a9739-f0b3-4616-b24a-87f08517f0cf

COVID-19 vaccine side effect causing false positive cancer screenings

Why take this shit? Seriously. It's barely been a year plus. I'll take the risk of getting Covid 19 for the next 5 years. #NotYourTestDummy

can•cer kăn′sər►
n. Any of various malignant neoplasms characterized by the proliferation of anaplastic cells that tend to invade surrounding tissue and metastasize to new body sites.
n. The pathological condition characterized by such growths.

Maybe the vaccine IS cancer.

Fuck vaccinations and remote learning. Just had my kids Chromebook microphone go out. Having a lazy day and had to get on camera with the teacher. Fuck google and this whole "pandemic." Hopefully a bunch of idiots get this vaccine and we go back to normal. I might start promoting it at this point.

As much as I don't trust Apple, for basic functions they just perform the necessary task I need them for. Chromebook is about to get punted into the frozen pool....

WookieMan says

Hopefully a bunch of idiots get this vaccine

They are. Many are bragging about how they are ready to get back to "a new normal", not realizing we are already there.

I get on the Internet and I see hope. I walk around the neighborhood and I see fearful eyes looking over masks at my unmasked self.

WookieMan says

we go back to normal

I am afraid we are getting to a point of no return. Our kids have lost a year of socialization and have been taught to fear the other, even friends and family. The economic, social, physical, and psychological effects of this huge fraud will be felt for years to come.

And it's not over yet.

WookieMan says

Chromebook

Chromebook's NEVER get viruses,

They come with them.

Onvacation says

I am afraid we are getting to a point of no return. Our kids have lost a year of socialization and have been taught to fear the other, even friends and family. The economic, social, physical, and psychological effects of this huge fraud will be felt for years to come.

The kid situation is rough. I fortunately live rural. It's agreed NOT to follow any mandates or EO's. If you're a Karen in public you'd get destroyed. Walk in with a mask and you get the side eye.

The school situation sucks as we're still only doing half days and the kids are "required" to wear masks. We've been hanging out like normal and sending the kids over to friends houses as usual. A few parents are cautious, but it's pretty normal here and has been the whole time. When I go to the suburbs of Chicago, I'm like how the fuck do you people live this way? It's not healthy mentally or physically.

Granny ain't gonna live forever. Unfortunately I think in urban areas masks are here to stay. Sucks traveling. What my biggest fear is if a vaccine "mandate" comes along for travel.

TX just removed mask mandates and opened everything indoor. FINALLY!
Expect karens to go batshit crazy.