patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,189,021 comments by 13,845 users - askmeaboutthesaltporkcure, HeadSet, just_passing_through, KgK one, NuttBoxer, Patrick, Skygoddess online now
Another Sneaky Propaganda Hit Piece-'The Social Dilemma' From Who Else- NetFucks
invite response
2020 Oct 15, 12:05pm 668 views 10 comments
Comments 1 - 10 of 10 Search these comments
1
rocketjoe79
2020 Oct 15, 1:50pm
rocketjoe79
2020 Oct 15, 1:50pm
We don't need censorship, we need Oversight with some regulation and restrictions in place. Like Mandatory, Government parental controls baked into all Social media platforms that limit total time per day for anyone under 18. An Adult or guardian must Opt-in any Application for anyone under 18. Even basic shit. ALL APPS. Then maybe parents will get tired of doing it, buy fewer devices and kids will do kids stuff.
2
ignoreme
2020 Oct 15, 2:46pm
I watched that. Thought it was pretty good. The fake news problem they brought up may have been overstated, but the parts about the addictive nature of social media were good. I found it interesting that the Facebook exec wouldn’t let his kids use it.
3
Ceffer
2020 Oct 15, 3:59pm
Ceffer
2020 Oct 15, 3:59pm
The internet isn't going anywhere, and they know it, no matter how faux-confessional. It is too embedded in too many economic and communication efficiencies. So, if you can hire non-internet connected tutors for your kids, you can cut them off from social media until their little unformed brains can't be polluted? The critters get their computers in the schools.
The confessional lead-in is just the intro for the propaganda bomb. They tell us how they are manipulating us, then continue to manipulate us on a different tack.
The confessional lead-in is just the intro for the propaganda bomb. They tell us how they are manipulating us, then continue to manipulate us on a different tack.
4
Hircus
2020 Oct 15, 4:07pm
Hircus
2020 Oct 15, 4:07pm
ignoreme says
I heard it's not uncommon for tech execs and founders to forbid or strictly limit their child's use of tech products.
I think bill gates and steve jobs both did, and I know I've heard at least a few others too.
I found it interesting that the Facebook exec wouldn’t let his kids use it.
I heard it's not uncommon for tech execs and founders to forbid or strictly limit their child's use of tech products.
I think bill gates and steve jobs both did, and I know I've heard at least a few others too.
5
Ceffer
2020 Oct 15, 4:11pm
Ceffer
2020 Oct 15, 4:11pm
Hircus says
Like drug dealers neither using nor allowing their own to use their products.
However, by making sure the products are as ubiquitous as possible, only wealthy oligarchs have the luxury of creating artificial environments in which it doesn't exist. I have a hunch that not even they can entirely keep it away from their kids short of keeping them in prison.
I heard it's not uncommon for tech execs and founders to forbid or strictly limit their child's use of tech products.
I think bill gates and steve jobs both did, and I know I've heard at least a few others too.
Like drug dealers neither using nor allowing their own to use their products.
However, by making sure the products are as ubiquitous as possible, only wealthy oligarchs have the luxury of creating artificial environments in which it doesn't exist. I have a hunch that not even they can entirely keep it away from their kids short of keeping them in prison.
6
Ceffer
2020 Oct 15, 6:18pm
Ceffer
2020 Oct 15, 6:18pm
Yup!
https://www.rt.com/usa/503631-youtube-censors-qanon-pizzagate/
"Facebook and Twitter have both cracked down on QAnon content already. Facebook began removing pages linked to the movement earlier this month, while Twitter banned thousands of accounts related to QAnon in July. YouTube also rejigged its recommendations system two years ago to throttle traffic to conspiracy content – a move it says has cut views of QAnon-related channels by 80 percent since January 2019."
But not BLM, Antifa or any of the Deep (Shallow) State related domestic terrorists, or children of Soros.
https://www.rt.com/usa/503631-youtube-censors-qanon-pizzagate/
"Facebook and Twitter have both cracked down on QAnon content already. Facebook began removing pages linked to the movement earlier this month, while Twitter banned thousands of accounts related to QAnon in July. YouTube also rejigged its recommendations system two years ago to throttle traffic to conspiracy content – a move it says has cut views of QAnon-related channels by 80 percent since January 2019."
But not BLM, Antifa or any of the Deep (Shallow) State related domestic terrorists, or children of Soros.
8
NuttBoxer
2020 Oct 15, 7:19pm
NuttBoxer
2020 Oct 15, 7:19pm
There's some pretty big stuff I disagreed with towards the end(PizzaGate). But I thought it was good overall. The fictional family where the daughter breaks their container because she can't be apart from her phone was pretty powerful, watching as a parent. What I liked most was that the documentary almost exclusively used testimony from people who had worked at these companies, some of them pretty high up.
I downloaded it as I'm no longer paying Netflix.
I downloaded it as I'm no longer paying Netflix.
9
BoomAndBustCycle
2020 Oct 15, 7:22pm
NuttBoxer says
You still believe PizzaGate wasn’t a hoax?
There's some pretty big stuff I disagreed with towards the end(PizzaGate
You still believe PizzaGate wasn’t a hoax?
10
NuttBoxer
2020 Oct 15, 7:44pm
NuttBoxer
2020 Oct 15, 7:44pm
BoomAndBustCycle says
Have you read the emails? Seen the Instagram posts? The art collection? Can you tell me what normal person talks about having pizza for half an hour?
My information was all first hand, directly from the emails and social media accounts of those accused.
So I think the question is, why don't you believe Podesta or Elefantes?
You still believe PizzaGate wasn’t a hoax?
Have you read the emails? Seen the Instagram posts? The art collection? Can you tell me what normal person talks about having pizza for half an hour?
My information was all first hand, directly from the emails and social media accounts of those accused.
So I think the question is, why don't you believe Podesta or Elefantes?
Conclusion is typically Orwellian: we let the genie out of the bottle, NOW IT MUST BE CONTROLLED WITH CENSORSHIP. All the bad shit everybody sees around them is from the free expression of CONSPIRACY THEORISTS promulgating FALSE KNOWLEDGE freely. Nobody should be questioning GLOBAL WARMING or SETTLED SCIENCE AROUND COVID. All of the current anarchy and political confusion isn't programmed by centralized NGO and Deep (Shallow) State forces of demoralization, it is because of a bunch of misguided and misinformed miscreants who have too much information freedom and access. Heroes of censorship will see that this doesn't happen anymore, and your CHILDREN WILL BE SAFE. The anti-heroes of the baleful internet genies will now become our saviors through censorship! And, we get to keep our cell phones! They'll be the good guys again. They will be our guardians and proscribe, de-fund, de-platform, and control the evil information.
All of these grandiose Silicon Valley mega millionaires and billionaires seem nervous that they can't completely control their own professed Frankenstein and have to give a place at the information highway to too many inconvenient people.
The good news is that they are insecure. The bad news is they are setting things up for mass censorship, which we already see, of internet content in order to silence all alternate voices. They want our money, our identity consciousness, our marketing but not our evaluating, calculating, collating brains. Unfortunately, too many people continue to think and control/disseminate information on their own. If only we could be pure manipulated consumers without any thought process challenging authority, everything would work out.
Prolly should be named, "The Globalist And Deep State Capture Of Social Media And Its Insecure Billionaire Twats. You FuckFaces Better Like It Or Else!"
https://www.thesocialdilemma.com/