« prev   random   next »
1   mell   ignore (6)   2020 Sep 11, 4:25pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

She's actually partially right in all of her posturing and huffing and puffing. The white leftoid womyn (which is most white womyn) is on the retreat and being outbread by blacks and Asians/Indians/middle-easterns. And by their own fault. Men and Womyn of any color would not tolerate such posturing back then and quickly duke shit like this out in a good tussle, but white womyn these days choose to herd cats and hate their own and grow old on prescription pills and alcohol while bowing down to foreign races, cultures and religions. It doesn't matter that that black bitch is significantly dumber. When it comes to asserting herself she has way more street smarts than the white womyn nervously chuckling when being insulted and assaulted instead of fighting back.
2   rocketjoe79   ignore (1)   2020 Sep 11, 5:09pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Drunk or drugs?
3   CBOEtrader   ignore (6)   2020 Sep 11, 6:46pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

bowdown BITCH, cause yo genes is recessive!

HAHAHA im gonna remember that
4   MisdemeanorRebel   ignore (3)   2020 Sep 11, 6:57pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Melanin makes them so much smarter and wiser hahahah
5   Ceffer   ignore (6)   2020 Sep 11, 7:12pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

If this had happened in Popeye's, bitch would have been punched, stripped and had a chair broken over her head by her black privilege sisters of color.

White women think they can bitch incessantly and never get a smackdown, while the fast food wrestling matches ignite almost immediately.
6   Patrick   ignore (1)   2020 Sep 11, 7:52pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/the-logic-of-bell-curve-leftism

There aren’t many books out there these days by revolutionary communists who are into the genetics of intelligence. ...

As a school teacher he encountered the simple, unavoidable fact that some humans are more academically gifted than others, and there’s nothing much anyone can do about it. He recalls his effort to teach long division to a boy who had managed to come a long way socially (he’d gone from being a hell-raiser to a good student) but who still struggled with something as elemental as long division: “At one point he broke into tears, as he had several times before … I exhaled slowly and felt myself give up, though of course I would never tell him so. I tried to console him, once again, and he said, ‘I just can’t do it.’ And it struck me, with unusual force, that he was right.” ...

And this is not because of anything he has done or failed to do — but simply because of his draw in the genetic lottery of life. The very American cult of education is supposed to end this injustice — except that it doesn’t, because it can’t, and its brutal logic actually exposes and entrenches the least defensible inequality of all, the inequality of nature.

This genetic reality — in fact, the very idea of nature existing at all — is currently a taboo topic on the left. In the most ludicrously untrue and yet suffocatingly omnipresent orthodoxy of our time, critical theory leftists insist that everything on earth is entirely socially constructed, that all inequality is a function of “oppressive systems”, and that human nature itself is what John Locke called a “white paper, void of all characters” — the famous blank slate. Freddie begs to differ: “Human behavioral traits, such as IQ, are profoundly shaped by genetic parentage, and this genetic influence plays a larger role in determining human outcomes than the family and home environment.” ...

Let the super-smart create the wealth and then tax the hell out of them — to provide Medicare for all, universal pre-K, and a UBI or a guaranteed job.

This genetic case for communism can leave a reader a little disoriented, I have to say, if only for its novelty. But it is more coherent, it seems to me, than a leftism that assumes that genes are irrelevant to humans and society, that the ultimate goal is to be as smart and thereby wealthy as possible, and that we can set up an educational system where everyone, regardless of their genetic inheritance, can succeed or fail by their own efforts. What sounds like a meritocratic dream is, in practice, a brutal and unforgiving formula for most who can’t achieve it — and has obviously failed if its task is to foster equality. In fact, mass education appears to have increased the gulf between rich and poor. As Freddie notes, “education is not a weapon against inequality; it is an engine of inequality.”


Not sure I like the idea of taxing the hell out of smarter people, but at least someone on the left is recognizing what is obvious. Not everything is "white oppression".

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions