2
0

Beirut Explosion Tactical Nuclear Weapon Intended For Israel?


 invite response                
2020 Sep 11, 6:45am   558 views  9 comments

by Ceffer   ➕follow (5)   💰tip   ignore  

Another story full of questions swept under the carpet? Tactical field nuke from Tehran intended for Hezbollah to use against Israel? So, who detonated it prematurely? Did they use fertilizer/fireworks fire as cover?
https://www.africa-express.info/2020/08/08/the-explosion-in-beirut-caused-by-a-tactical-atomic-bomb-stored-at-the-port/
Concussion front would not have been caused by standard chemical explosives?

www.youtube.com/embed/LNDhIGR-83w

Comments 1 - 9 of 9        Search these comments

1   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Sep 11, 6:50am  

Hezbollah is about to get the ISIS treatment. The Gulf States got based, and their commandos have been training for years now.

Seems like every other day, another Ayatollah-backed Hezzy goes missing in a "Work Accident".

Preparing the battlefield.
2   Shaman   2020 Sep 11, 7:29am  

Maybe there is an underground hot war going on. Spy vs. terrorist sort of thing. It can’t be a coincidence that Trump achieved the beginnings of peace in the Middle East after that gigantic explosion in Beirut!
3   Ceffer   2020 Sep 11, 7:37am  

Tactical Nuke has known installed backdoor to blow it up at will in terrorists' faces? How many more of these are out there?

Seduce your enemy by selling them a field nuke and then blow it up on them? They know the rest of them can be triggered anytime? Instant peace?

The speculator speculates on.
4   Goran_K   2020 Sep 11, 9:12am  

This theory out of all the other theories makes the most sense to me.
5   zzyzzx   2020 Sep 11, 9:30am  

I need a picture of the aftermath.
If it really were a nuke why no reports of radiation?
6   Ceffer   2020 Sep 11, 9:40am  

Hezbollah sympathetic government resigned en masse after explosion. A spot of embarrassment? If radiation present, covered up because it would admit the various complicities with the entry of a nuke into the port?
7   rocketjoe79   2020 Sep 11, 9:49am  

Look at videos of FAE (Fuel - Air Explosive). Very similar. Conventional weapons are very powerful too.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor#:~:text=Hanlon's%20razor%20is%20an%20aphorism,at%20least%20the%2018th%20century
8   Rin   2020 Sep 11, 11:18am  

How about a conventional MOAB?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBU-43/B_MOAB

It's about as powerful as a tactical nuke.
9   Ceffer   2020 Sep 11, 11:31am  

Atmospheric effects, speed and the instantaneous symmetry of nuke device seem to differ qualitatively from equivalent chemical weapons. The Beirut blast looks very much like a miniature version of the various atomic blasts in the archive, even the way it creates a spreading fragmentation front. I don't see that in the various MOAB type explosions.

Not a bomb expert, though.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions