« prev   random   next »


Beirut Explosion Tactical Nuclear Weapon Intended For Israel?

By Ceffer follow Ceffer   2020 Sep 11, 6:45am 268 views   9 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    

Another story full of questions swept under the carpet? Tactical field nuke from Tehran intended for Hezbollah to use against Israel? So, who detonated it prematurely? Did they use fertilizer/fireworks fire as cover?
Concussion front would not have been caused by standard chemical explosives?

1   NoCoupForYou   ignore (3)   2020 Sep 11, 6:50am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Hezbollah is about to get the ISIS treatment. The Gulf States got based, and their commandos have been training for years now.

Seems like every other day, another Ayatollah-backed Hezzy goes missing in a "Work Accident".

Preparing the battlefield.
2   Shaman   ignore (2)   2020 Sep 11, 7:29am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Maybe there is an underground hot war going on. Spy vs. terrorist sort of thing. It can’t be a coincidence that Trump achieved the beginnings of peace in the Middle East after that gigantic explosion in Beirut!
3   Ceffer   ignore (6)   2020 Sep 11, 7:37am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Tactical Nuke has known installed backdoor to blow it up at will in terrorists' faces? How many more of these are out there?

Seduce your enemy by selling them a field nuke and then blow it up on them? They know the rest of them can be triggered anytime? Instant peace?

The speculator speculates on.
4   Goran_K   ignore (3)   2020 Sep 11, 9:12am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

This theory out of all the other theories makes the most sense to me.
5   zzyzzx   ignore (2)   2020 Sep 11, 9:30am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

I need a picture of the aftermath.
If it really were a nuke why no reports of radiation?
6   Ceffer   ignore (6)   2020 Sep 11, 9:40am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Hezbollah sympathetic government resigned en masse after explosion. A spot of embarrassment? If radiation present, covered up because it would admit the various complicities with the entry of a nuke into the port?
7   rocketjoe79   ignore (1)   2020 Sep 11, 9:49am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Look at videos of FAE (Fuel - Air Explosive). Very similar. Conventional weapons are very powerful too.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"

8   Rin   ignore (8)   2020 Sep 11, 11:18am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

How about a conventional MOAB?


It's about as powerful as a tactical nuke.
9   Ceffer   ignore (6)   2020 Sep 11, 11:31am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Atmospheric effects, speed and the instantaneous symmetry of nuke device seem to differ qualitatively from equivalent chemical weapons. The Beirut blast looks very much like a miniature version of the various atomic blasts in the archive, even the way it creates a spreading fragmentation front. I don't see that in the various MOAB type explosions.

Not a bomb expert, though.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions