« prev   random   next »

2
0

Dr Zelenko's treatment protocol for Wuhan virus disease

By Patrick follow Patrick   2020 Aug 3, 5:22pm 978 views   27 comments         share      


Dr. Vladimir (Zev) Zelenko
Board Certified Family Practitioner
501 Rt 208, Monroe, NY 10950
845-238-0000


March 23, 2020

To all medical professionals around the world:

My name is Dr. Zev Zelenko and I practice medicine in Monroe, NY. For the last 16 years, I have cared for approximately 75% of the adult population of Kiryas Joel, which is a very close knit community of approximately 35,000 people in which the infection spread rapidly and unchecked prior to the imposition of social distancing.

As of today my team has tested approximately 200 people from this community for Covid-19, and 65% of the results have been positive. If extrapolated to the entire community, that means more than 20,000 people are infected at the present time. Of this group, I estimate that there are 1500 patients who are in the high-risk category (i.e. >60, immunocompromised, comorbidities, etc).

Given the urgency of the situation, I developed the following treatment protocol in the pre-hospital setting and have seen only positive results:

1. Any patient with shortness of breath regardless of age is treated.
2. Any patient in the high-risk category even with just mild symptoms is treated.
3. Young, healthy and low risk patients even with symptoms are not treated (unless their circumstances change and they fall into category 1 or 2).

My out-patient treatment regimen is as follows:

1. Hydroxychloroquine 200mg twice a day for 5 days
2. Azithromycin 500mg once a day for 5 days
3. Zinc sulfate 220mg once a day for 5 days

The rationale for my treatment plan is as follows. I combined the data available from China and South Korea with the recent study published from France (sites available on request). We know that hydroxychloroquine helps Zinc enter the cell. We know that Zinc slows viral replication within the cell. Regarding the use of azithromycin, I postulate it prevents secondary bacterial infections. These three drugs are well known and usually well tolerated, hence the risk to the patient is low.

Since last Thursday, my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel and another 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen.

Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams, we have had ZERO deaths, ZERO hospitalizations, and ZERO intubations. In addition, I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10% of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.

In sum, my urgent recommendation is to initiate treatment in the outpatient setting as soon as possible in accordance with the above. Based on my direct experience, it prevents acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), prevents the need for hospitalization and saves lives.

With much respect,

Dr. Zev Zelenko


cc: President Donald J. Trump; Mr. Mark Meadows, Chief of Staff
1   Patrick   2020 Aug 3, 5:26pm  

He said he has now treated 669 patients that way without losing any.
2   Onvacation   2020 Aug 3, 5:34pm  

Patrick says
approximately 10% of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.

You can die from that!

I'm a wait for the vaccine.

And then not take it because that can kill too.

But seriously, the pandemic is over everyone back to work.
3   Patrick   2020 Aug 9, 12:00pm  

The fraudulent (and now retracted) article in The Lancet purporting to show that HCQ is dangerous did incalculable damage to public health and public trust in scientists.

Now millions of people know about the supposed "danger", but not that the article was fraudulent and retracted.

They don't even think to themselves "Wait, it's been used for 75 years without problems, one of the most common medicines on earth, still used 100 million times a day for malaria, rheumatism, and lupus, but suddenly dangerous as soon as Trump mentions it?"

They just think "OMG, the press says I should avoid this because of a study in a prestigious journal." They never hear about the retraction.

And this was peer reviewed, which proves that peer review is also corrupt. A terrible thing for trust in science, all because of TDS.
4   tanked   2020 Aug 9, 12:23pm  

5 days if you know you have it. But unlimited days as a preventative?
5   Karloff   2020 Aug 9, 12:32pm  

By this point it should be beyond a shadow of a doubt that the MSM, WHO, CDC, and politicians have lied to the people of the world about everything regarding Covid-19 other than the fact that it exists and what some of its symptoms are.

There need to be mass arrests and trials for those involved in this gross violation of human rights.
6   tanked   2020 Aug 9, 1:02pm  

Karloff says
By this point it should be beyond a shadow of a doubt that the MSM, WHO, CDC, and politicians have lied to the people of the world about everything regarding Covid-19 other than the fact that it exists and what some of its symptoms are.

There need to be mass arrests and trials for those involved in this gross violation of human rights.


fraudci
7   WookieMan   2020 Aug 9, 1:40pm  

Karloff says
There need to be mass arrests and trials for those involved in this gross violation of human rights.

Bingo. Won't happen though. We've been knowingly lied to and basic data backs that assertion up. If you can do basic division, all the data is there for anyone to understand this has been orchestrated and hyped for whatever reason. Likely political and it's unraveling now. Ceffer posted a great video about the whole mask wearing BS. Everything is there for even high school educated people, yet we all just trust the media for information. It's scary.
8   Shaman   2020 Aug 9, 1:44pm  

Patrick says
And this was peer reviewed, which proves that peer review is also corrupt. A terrible thing for trust in science, all because of TDS.


Thing was, that article in the Lancet was NOT peer reviewed. It was in pre-print, which is where they stick articles prior to peer review. After cursory peer review led to questions the authors could not answer, and fraudulent methods were exposed, the article was formally retracted.

Most people outside the research community have no idea that there’s a difference between pre-print and peer reviewed published studies. But there is and it’s vital. I know only because my wife is doing her PhD right now and she told me about the difference.
9   Patrick   2020 Aug 9, 3:03pm  

Shaman says
that article in the Lancet was NOT peer reviewed


This article implies that it was:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-05/hydroxychloroquine-study-the-lancet-peer-review-coronavirus/12324118

But many scientists voiced concern about the study following its publication. Nearly 150 doctors signed an open letter to The Lancet questioning the article's conclusions, and calling for the peer review comments that preceded publication to be released.
10   theoakman   2020 Aug 9, 3:56pm  

The peer review process is a joke. When my research group would submit studies, if we got a pain in the ass we disagreed with, we just sent it somewhere else or my boss made a few phone calls. It is politics just like anything else under the guise of integrity. The ugly secret of science is that bad science is ignored rather than dealt with.
11   Patrick   2021 Aug 11, 3:47pm  


original link


Dr. Zelenko speaks to a Rabbinical court in Jerusalem
The Nation Of Israel Published August 5, 2021


I like the guy and his term "poison death shot".
12   richwicks   2021 Aug 11, 4:05pm  

Patrick says
They don't even think to themselves "Wait, it's been used for 75 years without problems, one of the most common medicines on earth, still used 100 million times a day for malaria, rheumatism, and lupus, but suddenly dangerous as soon as Trump mentions it?"

They just think "OMG, the press says I should avoid this because of a study in a prestigious journal." They never hear about the retraction.

And this was peer reviewed, which proves that peer review is also corrupt. A terrible thing for trust in science, all because of TDS.


But we know, don't we? And if we try to inform other people who don't know they call use retarded and crazy, and stupid.

So, do you really want to continue to try to help and inform people that just spit in your face when you attempt it?

After a point, you have to take the position of "fuck 'em, I tried..." There's people worth informing and there's people who are not. Give up on the NPC's. It's not worth your effort or you sympathy or your compassion.
13   Patrick   2021 Aug 11, 4:09pm  

Patrick says
Dr. Zelenko speaks to a Rabbinical court in Jerusalem


I didn't know that Trump signed an executive order to make HCQ available to everyone, but the CDC squashed it, not allowing it unless a patient was already near death in the hospital.
14   Onvacation   2021 Aug 11, 4:13pm  

richwicks says
do you really want to continue to try to help and inform people that just spit in your face when you attempt it?

That is the one good reason for mask mandates.
15   Onvacation   2021 Aug 11, 4:13pm  

Patrick says


I didn't know that Trump signed an executive order to make HCQ available to everyone, but the CDC squashed it, not allowing it unless a patient was already near death in the hospital.

At which point it is useless and they can say, "See, it doesn't work".
16   Patrick   2021 Aug 11, 4:14pm  

richwicks says
So, do you really want to continue to try to help and inform people that just spit in your face when you attempt it?


Yes, because they will kill us with the mandatory jab if we fail to convince them in time.
17   richwicks   2021 Aug 12, 2:50am  

Patrick says
richwicks says
So, do you really want to continue to try to help and inform people that just spit in your face when you attempt it?


Yes, because they will kill us with the mandatory jab if we fail to convince them in time.


This isn't coming from a bunch of NPCs and Karens. This is top down. NPCs can't be convinced. Do you know anybody who is an INDEPENDENT thinker that you believe would say something like "What's wrong with Drag Queen Story Hour? It's just a bunch of kids being entertained!"

This shit is coming from top down, and believe me, you might be able to change 1 or 2 minds, if you REALLY work at it, but you can't change a million. They are just sheep.
18   Patrick   2021 Sep 5, 4:26pm  



original link


I like Zelenko.
19   richwicks   2021 Sep 5, 6:03pm  

Patrick says
And this was peer reviewed, which proves that peer review is also corrupt. A terrible thing for trust in science, all because of TDS.


Oh boo hoo, peer review is being looked at.

Climate change has been peer reviewed. Is LA, NYC, or SFC under water due to ocean levels rising? They were supposed to be by 2005, when I was a 14 year old kid.

You can't lie in physics, you can't lie in math. You can TEMPORARILY lie about more complex sciences like medicine because it's so complex. You can easily lie in psychology and that's been done repeatedly - this might be a paradoxically good thing because psychology is the basis of propaganda and control of a population.

I think the dishonesty and fraud in psychology is why so many people haven't gotten the vaccine. Months ago, it was supposed to be 75% for the United States. Incompetence and fraud may be very helpful to us.
20   clambo   2021 Sep 5, 10:24pm  

Re: people not wanting to take the shot:
One reason is just to say no to the people who have pushed them around for a year.
Another reason is the constant over hyping of the pandemic, the contradictory statements by Fauci, the censorship of doctors who have treated Wuhan patients, and the stolen election have created a distrust for the medical establishment.
21   Patrick   2021 Sep 6, 2:47am  

Isn't there a line in Sun Tzu's Art of War where he says "When your enemy is making a mistake, do not interrupt him."

Something like half the US Army is now seething in rage against Biden for demanding that they submit to the jab and enforcing that with military law.

And they will never forget it or forgive any leftist for doing this to them, if they survive it.
22   richwicks   2021 Sep 6, 1:58pm  

Patrick says
Something like half the US Army is now seething in rage against Biden for demanding that they submit to the jab and enforcing that with military law.


Just remember that the White House staff is exempt from it. Why?
23   Patrick   2021 Sep 6, 2:06pm  

Right, that White House self-exemption while forcing it on healthy members of the military is undoubtedly known by a lot of the military.

Biden is actively undermining his own support.

If he pisses off the military enough, they will revolt. The only question is what it will take.
24   richwicks   2021 Sep 6, 2:54pm  

Patrick says
If he pisses off the military enough, they will revolt.


One can hope, and I've been hoping for this for 20 years.

Military dictatorship wouldn't be ideal, but we're under a MIC dictatorship anyhow.
25   AmericanKulak   2021 Sep 6, 3:29pm  

Patrick says
Right, that White House self-exemption while forcing it on healthy members of the military is undoubtedly known by a lot of the military.

Biden is actively undermining his own support.

If he pisses off the military enough, they will revolt. The only question is what it will take.


Maybe it's intentional.

By mandating the COVID vax, who are the most likely to be skeptical and refuse and resign?

The same people most likely to dislike Biden and uphold traditional American Values.

Who is the least likely to resist?

The ones most likely to go along with official narratives.

So its another way to purge the Military of suspect loyalty?
26   Karloff   2021 Sep 6, 4:54pm  

The UK House of Commons also exempted their members from The Mark.

Mark Harper (Tory MP): "It’d be outrageous if the executive were to attempt to prevent any Member of Parliament attending this House to represent our constituents without first undergoing a medical procedure!"

Lindsay Hoyle (speaker of the house): "I have had no indication that the Government considers the policy he’s mentioned should apply to this House. There is nothing to stop a member coming into here, you have the right to come to this House unless this House otherwise says so. The Government’s not been in touch. I don’t expect them to be in touch because, as far as I’m concerned, it doesn’t apply to members.”
27   Onvacation   2021 Sep 6, 5:08pm  

Karloff says
as far as I’m concerned, it doesn’t apply to members

If you're not part of the club you'll have no privilege

Please register to comment:

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions