by FuckTheMainstreamMedia ➕follow (3) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 20 of 20 Search these comments
Maybe systemic is the wrong word, but I would say white people in America having a few century head start in owning property is pretty good example of inequality. An entire race couldn’t own property in the US for centuries, have bank accounts, get loans, work for a wage, ect. I think that’s a difficult burden to overcome... kinda like being given a few mile headstart in a marathon.
And that’s not even taking into account more recent Jim Crow laws that still existed up to the 1950s. We are only 70 years removed from very specific discrimatory laws on the books. Not sure how you can call fairly recent American history a fairy tale?
Maybe systemic is the wrong word, but I would say white people in America having a few century head start in owning property is pretty good example of inequality. An entire race couldn’t own property in the US for centuries, have bank accounts, get loans, work for a wage, ect. I think that’s a difficult burden to overcome... kinda like being given a few mile headstart in a marathon.
And that’s not even taking into account more recent Jim Crow laws that still existed up to the 1950s. We are only 70 years removed from very specific discrimatory laws on the books. Not sure how you can call fairly recent American history a fairy tale?
If it's systemic, name the laws and policies in place that are racist. And who wrote them and voted them in.
The only racist policies and laws on the books that I can think of, is Affirmative Action Rules.
Maybe systemic is the wrong word, but I would say white people in America having a few century head start in owning property is pretty good example of inequality. An entire race couldn’t own property in the US for centuries, have bank accounts, get loans, work for a wage, ect. I think that’s a difficult burden to overcome... kinda like being given a few mile headstart in a marathon.
Maybe systemic is the wrong word, but I would say white people in America having a few century head start in owning property is pretty good example of inequality. An entire race couldn’t own property in the US for centuries, have bank accounts, get loans, work for a wage, ect. I think that’s a difficult burden to overcome... kinda like being given a few mile headstart in a marathon.Asians and Middle Easterners seem to have no problem coming here and building wealth and owning property, so why do Blacks have such a hard time and can't stop whining about it?
And that’s not even taking into account more recent Jim Crow laws that still existed up to the 1950s. We are only 70 years removed from very specific discrimatory laws on the books. Not sure how you can call fairly recent American history a fairy tale?
Maybe systemic is the wrong word, but I would say white people in America having a few century head start in owning property is pretty good example of inequality. An entire race couldn’t own property in the US for centuries, have bank accounts, get loans, work for a wage, ect. I think that’s a difficult burden to overcome... kinda like being given a few mile headstart in a marathon.
(a) The State shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.
(b) This section shall apply only to action taken after the section's effective date.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting bona fide qualifications based on sex which are reasonably necessary to the normal operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as invalidating any court order or consent decree which is in force as of the effective date of this section.
(e) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting action which must be taken to establish or maintain eligibility for any federal program, where ineligibility would result in a loss of federal funds to the State.
(f) For the purposes of this section, "State" shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the State itself, any city, county, city and county, public university system, including the University of California, community college district, school district, special district, or any other political subdivision or governmental instrumentality of or within the State.
(g) The remedies available for violations of this section shall be the same, regardless of the injured party's race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin, as are otherwise available for violations of then-existing California antidiscrimination law.
(h) This section shall be self-executing. If any part or parts of this section are found to be in conflict with federal law or the United States Constitution, the section shall be implemented to the maximum extent that federal law and the United States Constitution permit. Any provision held invalid shall be severable from the remaining portions of this section.[2]
white people in America having a few century head start in owning property
https://www.facebook.com/Davidbanner/videos/496985144364195/?vh=e
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,190,141 comments by 13,851 users - brazil66, Ceffer, GNL, mell online now