Comments 1 - 8 of 8        Search these comments

2   Ceffer   2020 Jun 4, 4:49pm  

Profit taking from the scare, then trying to shift gears back for some semblance of ongoing credibility. Seems there is a lot of that going on lately.
3   Rin   2020 Jun 4, 4:58pm  

And it goes beyond that.

The US study used varying dosages of HCQ, above the 400-600 mg per day, which, as a ceiling as in the case of many chronic lupus/rheumatoid arthritis sufferers, is safe for almost anyone, even if one doesn't have the best of cardiac or renal health.

So then, I ask ... why are the studies, using Azithromycin? What does this antibiotic, having nothing to do with viral replication, a major adjuvant? Realize, we're not treating strep throat.

Can some society's b*tch conformist on PatNet tell me ... why a major study is using an adjuvant to HCQ, instead of Zinc, which has nothing to do with preventing the proliferation of a virus?

You see, the study itself, has NO SCIENCE in it. It's to do a pulse check on some cultural innuendo that HCQ is not safe at higher than X dose (DUH! No shit Sherlock!) and that as a stand alone (esp with a useless antibiotic), is not an antiviral treatment, prophylaxis or otherwise.

Wow! All this scientific thinking and genius behind a botched protocol!

I'm glad I made my money in finance. If I were in medicine, I might have punked a pharma executive in frustration.
4   Rin   2020 Jun 4, 5:13pm  

And please don't bring up opportunistic infection, during Covid-19. You can use just about any antibiotic for that, from amoxicillin to Cipro.
5   Tenpoundbass   2020 Jun 4, 5:14pm  

The Liberals have murdered 100K people in this country alone, they are Genocidal murderous homicidal freaks.

They have killed more people worldwide with their smear against the cure, than Hitler killed. They'll probably top Stalin.

Fucking unbelievable, they are fucking animals. Heartless gutless blind little lemming fucking animals.
They didn't know if it worked or not, the nay sayers on the forums, didn't want a cure for the virus, they wanted to kill people worldwide.

It's all that is in a Liberal's heart.
6   SunnyvaleCA   2020 Jun 4, 6:55pm  

One of the problems/benefits with TDS (and I really mean "derangement") is that people are going out of their way to go against anything Trump promotes. In this case, some are pushing that HCQ is "dangerous," even if it is obvious that — at worst — it's a well-understood drug that is fairly harmless.

Just this week, some mayors seem to be promoting rioting and looting only because Trump has come out strongly on the side of law and order.

Trump wants borders and an enforced immigration plan... the other side is now pushing for open borders, no standards at all for who can enter, etc. Not even health checks for communicable diseases, which is just plain common sense.
7   Patrick   2021 Aug 30, 10:43am  

The Lancet seems to be rife with fraud, over and over and over.

Jay Bhattacharya
@DrJBhattacharya
16h
The collapse of public faith in the institutions of public health is unfortunately well earned. We will need a generation of hard work and humility to repair the damage.

Martin Kulldorff
@MartinKulldorff
3h
In 1998, @TheLancet editor @richardhorton1 published a study falsely linking autism to vaccines. In 2020, he published a memorandum falsely claiming that the scientific "consensus" doubted lasting immunity after COVID disease. Both with dire consequences for public health.

Martin Kulldorff
@MartinKulldorff
17h
The pandemic will end; because all pandemics end. But, it will take years to recover from the collateral public health damage caused by missed medical visits, school closures and other lockdown measures.

https://collateralglobal.org/


https://twitter.com/MartinKulldorff
8   Patrick   2022 Mar 28, 7:50pm  

https://doyourownresearch.substack.com/p/the-lancet-tip-of-the-narrative-spear?s=r&source=patrick.net


The Lancet: Tip of the Narrative Spear
Whenever the powers that be found themselves on the ropes, the Lancet was there to bend the rules, ever in their favor.

From the lab leak hypothesis to early treatment, from human-to-human transmission to lockdowns, the Lancet was there to make some absolutely understandable errors, but always in the same direction.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions