2
0
🎂

I'm just going to block every Patnet communist that Supports this lawlessness while attacking Ameircans


 invite response                
2020 Jun 1, 2:16pm   1,842 views  41 comments

by Tenpoundbass   ➕follow (7)   💰tip   ignore  

There is no benefit in debating with Useful Idiots. It's not worth the hassle.

Comments 1 - 40 of 41       Last »     Search these comments

1   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2020 Jun 1, 2:18pm  

I'll miss the political images thread. But oh well.
2   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2020 Jun 1, 2:19pm  

It only took about 5, Patnet rocks now!
3   Rin   2020 Jun 1, 4:48pm  

Who supports this? I couldn't even leave my home last night because of 'em.
4   AD   2020 Jun 1, 4:59pm  

Tenpoundbass says
There is no benefit in debating with Useful Idiots. It's not worth the hassle.


TenPoundBass, there is only maybe 3 or 4 that fit that description. If it was 50% or more of Patnet then I could see a reason to block.
5   Booger   2020 Jun 1, 5:15pm  

We need a national "stand your ground" law for vehicles: if you believe you are in imminent danger from a hostile mob around your vehicle, you should be legally allowed to drive over or through them.
6   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2020 Jun 1, 5:20pm  

ad says
If it was 50% or more of Patnet then I could see a reason to block.
They account for more than 50% of the posts and replies. I'm not blocking them forever. I just don't want to hear them troll people with their distorted view. Nobody can defend what's going on, and honestly say Trump and his supporters are Racist. They are being ugly at our expense. Why give them an audience to do so.

I'm fully aware people blocked can still post in my threads or respond to me. I'm fine with that, I'm not trying to alter how other's see what they post.
That's what's great about the second amendment you don't have to listen to it, you just can't stop people from telling others their message.
7   AD   2020 Jun 1, 5:51pm  

.

Booger says
We need a national "stand your ground" law for vehicles: if you believe you are in imminent danger from a hostile mob around your vehicle, you should be legally allowed to drive over or through them.


It helps that driver was driving a Fed Ex truck.

No way that Minnesota and its Muslim, left-wing attorney general (Keith Ellison) would want to press charges against the scared driver.

.
8   just_passing_through   2020 Jun 2, 6:18am  

Yeah, I finally blocked that newbie troll.
9   WookieMan   2020 Jun 2, 6:53am  

just_dregalicious says
Yeah, I finally blocked that newbie troll.

Someone's gotta quote me in a thread he's active on. He put me on ignore 😥 because BTC hasn't hit 100k US Dollars. Hell it's not even remotely close. Now this "I'm a republican yet all cops are racists losers" crap. One cop in a leftist city, that wasn't allowed to be canned/fired because leftist policies (unions and leadership), somehow makes it important that he's a Republican??? Twilight zone shit.

But, I got a troll to put me on ignore... that is somehow satisfying. And if this comment is deemed personal, mark it that way. Just stating factual observations.
10   ignoreme   2020 Jun 2, 7:22am  

Is it possible to see who has you on ignore? I don’t see anything in my profile.
11   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2020 Jun 2, 7:28am  

If you don't see a users threads, then that person has you on ignore.
12   WookieMan   2020 Jun 2, 7:32am  

Tenpoundbass says
If you don't see a users threads, then that person has you on ignore.

I can still see newbie's comments (not sure about threads), but he can't see anything of mine if he puts me on ignore. Or that's at least my understanding. The "Freedom to Offend" link at the top I think explains it better.
13   WookieMan   2020 Jun 2, 7:35am  

ignoreme says
Is it possible to see who has you on ignore? I don’t see anything in my profile.

And no. Patrick dumped that feature for logical reasons, though I don't necessarily agree. It's also not my site so I try to play by the rules as much as possible. I think his theory was that it would create more animosity between users knowing that one ignored the other. Leads to people creating alt accounts and still attacking that person out of spite. Which like I said is logical and that behavior could make entire discussions turn into flame wars between two people all the time.
14   mostly_reader   2020 Jun 2, 8:43am  

Booger says
We need a national "stand your ground" law for vehicles: if you believe you are in imminent danger from a hostile mob around your vehicle, you should be legally allowed to drive over or through them.
I wonder what the existing laws around that are. If mob (or an individual) is breaking your car glass, or attempts to open card doors, you should fear for your life, because your head is behind that glass and it may be next. With all the implications (one of them is that you are behind the steering wheel of a deadly weapon)
That's in theory. No idea whether you'd get charged, how this would play out in courtroom, and how it would be motivated by political climate.
15   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2020 Jun 2, 9:03am  

mostly_reader says
Booger says
We need a national "stand your ground" law for vehicles: if you believe you are in imminent danger from a hostile mob around your vehicle, you should be legally allowed to drive over or through them.
I wonder what the existing laws around that are. If mob (or an individual) is breaking your car glass, or attempts to open card doors, you should fear for your life, because your head is behind that glass and it may be next. With all the implications (one of them is that you are behind the steering wheel of a deadly weapon)
That's in theory. No idea whether you'd get charged, how this would play out in courtroom, and how it would be motivated by political climate.


The abdication of their most basic duty...the protection of citizen, visitors, and their property....by entirely Democrat Mayors during the Occupy and other planned, financed “movements”. Letting protestors get on the freeway and failing to arrest them and throw away the key, camping out on city property and in a moment of absolutely absurd virtue sIgnaling, the politicians being protested in the occupy movement stated solidarity with the protestors has been a grave misstep.

There’s one way to deal with this and the Democrat politicians have no desire to do so.
16   WookieMan   2020 Jun 2, 9:11am  

FuckTheMainstreamMedia says
There’s one way to deal with this and the Democrat politicians have no desire to do so.

They're the one's that gave this piece of shit cop the opportunity to stay on the force after multiple infractions. Dude should have been canned before this was allowed to happen on their watch. Public sector unions blow and this is the outcome. Public sector unions are an invention of the Democrats and it will be their downfall. Their main goal is to fleece taxpayers for the most amount of money acceptable and then to protect their buddies they all hired to keep getting reelected.

It's a smart scheme, but I think people are waking up to the bullshit of government. Public sector unions need to go today, not tomorrow. Sorry if you're in one, but if you have skills you'll get paid somehow or somewhere. We need to get the losers out of government work now.
17   marcus   2020 Jun 2, 9:41am  

Protesting isn't lawlessness.

Does TPB think there are people on this forum that support destruction of property or looting, or violence ?

Sounds like TDS to me.
18   mostly_reader   2020 Jun 2, 9:53am  

marcus says
Protesting isn't lawlessness.

Does TPB think there are people on this forum that support destruction of property or looting ?
Directly - possibly. Indirectly - certainly. You would be a one, for example, indirectly supporting destruction of property and looting. At this point educating others about fine differences between "protesting" and "rioting" is exactly that.

I'll elaborate. There is such thing as branding. When that cop killed George Floyd, he hurt the brand of all the cops, and since the victim was black, he also hurt the brand of all the whites. You can go into details about how much did he really hurt it, because others reacted quickly and many condemned him totally, rescuing the brand, and again, I won't go into details regarding the extent to which they rescued it.

Looters and rioters has destroyed the brand of protesters, whatever their numbers where. It's a done deal. Here, watch and weep:
www.youtube.com/embed/AEncQKV8k_0

Richmond, Virginia police chief, at 3:25 talks how rioters set fire to a multi-family home with children inside and then blocked fire department from getting there.

This is the point at which I say "F#$k You" to anyone who attempts to legitimize what's happening on the streets by drawing fine lines and explaining that there are good and bad apples.
19   marcus   2020 Jun 2, 9:58am  

mostly_reader says
Looters and rioters has destroyed the brand of protesters


If that's all it takes to ruin the brand of protests, then protesting never really could be a positive thing, at least not over something like racial issues.

Because it's very easy to send in even just one or two people to break store fronts or shove a cop, to turn a peaceful protest in to a riot.

By your formula, if there are people that oppose the protest very much, they can easily make it into a riot, problem solved. Now protests can't happen - and it's the protesters fault.
20   mostly_reader   2020 Jun 2, 10:01am  

> marcus
Oh, shite. "If that's all it takes?" ??? Did you read my post, did you watch the video? SETTING CHILDREN ON FIRE AND BLOCKING FIRE TRUCK - yes, that should do it!!
21   marcus   2020 Jun 2, 10:20am  

Can't help you with literacy. I didn't say that all recent riots were someone elses fault.

My point was that if you can say that all protests over an issue lose credibility becasue some protests over the same issue got ugly ? There is a serious logic problem there. Then it would be too easy for the govt or opposition to turn a good protest in to a riot. Now it's over ? Wtf ?

Also why should all people that want to protest something be punished by some people that did it wrong.

mostly_reader says
Looters and rioters has destroyed the brand of protesters, whatever their numbers where.
22   WookieMan   2020 Jun 2, 10:42am  

marcus says
Also why should all people that want to protest something be punished by some people that did it wrong.

Because it's gotten out of control. It's too difficult for the police to calm people down at this point without it being labeled police brutality. I'm not calling for a shut down in the ability to protest, but at some point if you want to get vigilantes and the military involved, maybe keep the "protests" peaceful or you'll get what's coming.

In rural IL we've got credible threats on local police officers that live in my town. Their kids go to school with my kids. We will protect them as they're not the cops involved in the BS in MN. Democratic policies are what caused this whole situation and the left has gone full retard on the situation. They're going to end up dead if they come here at least.

Understand that if this spreads outside cities, protesters are going to die. It will be bad, very bad. As a person that leans left, you need to speak to your people and tell them to back off however you can. I'm being sincere and not sarcastic either. If the looters/rioters intermingle with protesters in my town and start shit, they're going to get mowed down. No joke. We have 2 full time cops and 300+ citizens with guns. No cameras outside. I don't think most people understand how united most other places are when they live in shit holes called cities.
23   mostly_reader   2020 Jun 2, 11:02am  

marcus says
My point was that if you can say that all protests over an issue lose credibility becasue some protests over the same issue got ugly ?
Make at least an effort to follow the thought. I explained that this protest has gotten out of hand, and that anyone trying to legitimize it from that point forward is responsible. That includes you.
Generalization and abstraction was your idea. You switched from me explaining that you are indirectly supporting the looters to talking how looting is secondary in grander scheme of things. Strawman.

Did you watch the video? Just so you know who exactly you are supporting. That's now your branding.
24   Onvacation   2020 Jun 2, 11:17am  

marcus says

Does TPB think there are people on this forum that support destruction of property or looting, or violence ?

There are some non racist republicans (not the normal kind) who think the rioting is righteous.
25   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2020 Jun 2, 11:21am  

Anyone that thinks the so called peaceful protesters can interfere with the law and emergency services, that is trying to get to the violence and destruction behind the "Peaceful Protesters" and not protect the citizens being robbed and killed. Is not being honest with anyone not even themselves.

These are not peaceful protesters they are Useful Idiots, and co-conspirators and complacent at best for the lawlessness and destruction. Any self respecting decent human being at a peaceful protest would say this is not what I signed up for and get out of the Police way to restore order.

At this point every Peaceful Protester is a Co-defendant for some serious crimes. It's no secret how these protest and riots around the country are going every night.
Any parent allowing their kids out to attend, should be arrested for child endangerment as well.

There is just One Law in America and I have a feeling a huge network of Liberals, Socialist, Shit stirrers, Agitators and the Agitprop fans are all about to find out, what that law is.
26   Onvacation   2020 Jun 2, 11:24am  

marcus says
Also why should all people that want to protest something be punished by some people that did it wrong.

Officially, I am still under "stay at home" orders. Why am I being punished because some old and compromised at are at slight risk of death and China is asshoe?
27   marcus   2020 Jun 2, 11:24am  

I understand you., and claim that you are very clearly wrong. Not even close to making sense.

mostly_reader says
this protest has gotten out of hand, and that anyone trying to legitimize it from that point forward is responsible. That includes you.

mostly_reader says
Generalization and abstraction was your idea. You switched from me explaining that you are indirectly supporting the looters to talking how looting is secondary in grander scheme of things. Strawman.


Not even close to what I said. I can not easily make my point more clearly. I understand your point and I'm explaining why I dissagree.


marcus says
My point was that if you can say that all protests over an issue lose credibility becasue some protests over the same issue got ugly ? There is a serious logic problem there. Then it would be too easy for the govt or opposition to turn a good protest in to a riot. Now it's over ? Wtf ?

Also why should all people that want to protest something be punished by some people that did it wrong.
28   mostly_reader   2020 Jun 2, 11:39am  

marcus says
I understand you.,
https://youtu.be/4T2GmGSNvaM?t=54 - I don't think you do.
You went to escape hatch (labeled "abstraction and generalization") when you started to talk about "all protests" and how they would be easy to manipulate.

Just so we are clear. No one in their right mind defends killer(s) of George Floyd. Neither on the left, nor on the right. Everyone (in their right mind) wants to see him/them punished.
You, on the other hand, are now aligned with looters and murderers. It's as simple as that.
29   marcus   2020 Jun 2, 11:42am  

mostly_reader says
Just so we are clear.

mostly_reader says
You, on the other hand, are now aligned with looters and murderers. It's as simple as that.


What, do you think you used the transitive property to get there ?

Just out of curiosity, are you an engineer of some kind, or programmer ?
30   RWSGFY   2020 Jun 2, 11:47am  

marcus says
Does TPB think there are people on this forum that support destruction of property or looting, or violence ?


Newbie123 said it openly in words which leave no space for doubt.
31   mostly_reader   2020 Jun 2, 12:06pm  

marcus says
What, do you think you used the transitive property to get there ?
I have explained it to you how I got there. I'll repeat, but pay attention this time: at this point, trying to legitimize what's happening IS aligning with pure evil. Yet you attempt to do it by inviting others to consider subtleties. I hope I'm making myself clear.

marcus says
Just out of curiosity, are you an engineer of some kind, or programmer ?
Please, don't try to play wizard: you should remember me weighing in on technical issues in the past. Engineering is a large part of what I do, and so is communication.
32   marcus   2020 Jun 2, 11:54pm  

mostly_reader says
at this point, trying to legitimize what's happening IS aligning with pure evil. Yet you attempt to do it by inviting others to consider subtleties. I hope I'm making myself clear.


You still make zero sense from my viewpoint.

The protests aren't wrong. The other people that want to take advantage of it, to loot or instigate a riot are wrong.

It's not a binary, completely evil or totally righteous and good. I don't know why things have to be so simplified for you and one extreme or the other. I can deal with the nuance. I'm not going to apologize to you for that. Maybe feel a little bad for you that you can't.

mostly_reader says
Engineering is a large part of what I do, and so is communication.


I see.
33   WookieMan   2020 Jun 3, 5:39am  

marcus says
The protests aren't wrong.

Even the peaceful protests are wrong. If you're an adult you can get elected to office. That's how you "protest" and change things. Bust the union up that likely protected this cop from all his past transgressions. Revise policy and procedures for employee termination. If you cannot fire an ass hoe cop, wandering down the street with stupid signs does nothing. No one cares. I don't.
34   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2020 Jun 3, 6:20am  

WookieMan says
marcus says
The protests aren't wrong.

Even the peaceful protests are wrong. If you're an adult you can get elected to office. That's how you "protest" and change things. Bust the union up that likely protected this cop from all his past transgressions. Revise policy and procedures for employee termination. If you cannot fire an ass hoe cop, wandering down the street with stupid signs does nothing. No one cares. I don't.


This is true. The protestors are idiots. What they really want is cops to have less probable cause to make stops AND they want it to be easier to criminally charge cops. But they don’t know that. Well the Dems have held California for 20 years including Governor, Senate, and assembly and including a supermajority in both the Senate and Assembly for many of those years. They could have fixed the laws governing those things. But they haven’t. I’m guessing of the protestors that vote, 99% vote Democrat.

I’ll suggest one thing immediately and it should be easy. Front window tint is legal in AZ and NV, not in CA. Even though much of California is blazing hot, front window tint is still illegal. Cops use it regularly to have probable cause to stop citizens. Make it legal and you remove a probable cause element. But why would a freedom hating facist like Richard Pan or Evan Low ever want to do that?

I’ll go a step further and take the most wild of guesses that not a single protestor could explain probable cause, and how it affects law enforcement work. Just like absolutely none of them can explain why the three other cops on scene at the George Floyd murder ought to be legally charged.
35   RWSGFY   2020 Jun 3, 12:19pm  

Newbie123 says
I am not a supporter of the riots


Yes you are.
36   RWSGFY   2020 Jun 3, 12:25pm  

Newbie123 says
covid_shmovid says
Newbie123 says
I am not a supporter of the riots


Yes you are.


No, I am not for violence


Bullshit. It's too late to backpedal. You've said enough over the last week to make your support for the mayhem abundantly clear.

Stop lying.
37   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2020 Jun 3, 12:41pm  

Newbie123 says
Btw, I am republican.


Who's your local RNC president? Quick off the top of your head!
Wope! Oh there he goes Googling it.
38   WookieMan   2020 Jun 3, 12:55pm  

Newbie123 says
Cops are here to serve and protect.

He didn't do that job. End of story. Has nothing to do with this.....
Newbie123 says
racist behaviors by cops.

Which most, if any are not racists. They're policing crime where it exists. Not difficult to understand.

The riots did nothing. If getting cops arrested is a victory, people need to rethink life. You want change, go out and actually do it unlike most the cowards "protesting" or whatever you want to call it. Get elected. Make change happen instead of bitching about it like a coward. The guy should have never been a cop after a dozen complaints. Mentioning you're a Republican has nothing to do with the topic at hand. It's useless information.
39   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2020 Jun 3, 12:55pm  

Newbie123 says
As a true republican you don’t care if someone is black or white. An American is an American.


Not that there's anything wrong with that...

No! Not at all...
40   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2020 Jun 3, 1:56pm  

If you have a factual point to make then make it. Your constant reverse queer bashing, it getting tiresome.

Comments 1 - 40 of 41       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions