Comments 1 - 13 of 13 Search these comments
I think the policy of herd immunity is the right policy. I think Britain was on exactly the right track before they were fed wrong numbers. And they made a huge mistake. I see the standout winners as Germany and Sweden. They didn’t practise too much lockdown and they got enough people sick to get some herd immunity. I see the standout losers as countries like Austria, Australia and Israel that had very strict lockdown but didn’t have many cases. They have damaged their economies, caused massive social damage, damaged the educational year of their children, but not obtained any herd immunity.
“There is no doubt in my mind, that when we come to look back on this, the damage done by lockdown will exceed any saving of lives by a huge factor.
- Professor Michael Levitt
https://unherd.com/thepost/nobel-prize-winning-scientist-the-covid-19-epidemic-was-never-exponential/
I think a lot of academic types are staying silent because they have learned that bucking the dragons of political trends only hurts them.
Our commitment to heterodoxy within the academy has taken shape as a response to the rise of orthodoxy within scholarly culture — when people fear shame, ostracism, or any other form of social or professional retaliation for questioning or challenging a commonly held idea. We believe that the best way to prevent orthodoxy from taking root within the academy is by fostering three key principles: open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement.
I see the standout winners as Germany and Sweden.
Patrick saysI see the standout winners as Germany and Sweden.
I understand that Germany doesn't report deaths in nursing homes as Covid-19, regardless of the cause. So their death numbers are not directly comparable. The Krauts have always had a certain view toward, shall we say, so called non productive people. All data is suspect. it is in the self-interests of all governments to minimize the death rate, not exaggerate it.
Swedish death rate is quite high compared to neighboring countries, it remains to be seen if they have the correct approach. They also have a much more inclusive health care system than US. Apparently their economy is not faring better than other similar Eurozone counties due to the fact it's export driven and I guess nobody is buying Volvos. I hear they are having second thoughts as to their approach.
Most of this is false.
The US has a drastically different and inferior health care delivery system compared Sweden, neighboring countries are similar thus the more to the point, and their standard of livings are similar. Its a nanny state.
Can anyone explain why my county is shut down logically? We lose more than 2 a month to auto accidents across the county.
Scroll to the bottom, look at "View Data Table" which is a pdf link. Open the pdf file and see this:
Take this formula for each row in 2020: (% of Total - Baseline) * Total Deaths
That's excess over normal deaths for that week of the year. Add them up. It comes to 39,840 deaths above what was expected from pneumonia plus influenza in a normal year.
So we actually have about 40,000 excess deaths up to April 25th. Even if you add in 2,000 deaths per day for this week, it still does not match the the 67,444 deaths reported on worldometers.info or the 64,943 deaths as reported by Johns Hopkins as of today.
Here's the raw data from the pdf file if you want to try this at home:
Week Total_Deaths Number pct_of_total Baseline Threshold
1 59,146 4,441 7.5 6.7 7.0
2 59,194 4,471 7.6 6.7 7.1
3 57,668 4,365 7.6 6.8 7.2
4 57,065 4,238 7.4 6.9 7.2
5 57,263 4,156 7.3 6.9 7.3
6 57,613 4,165 7.2 7.0 7.3
7 56,871 4,208 7.4 7.0 7.3
8 56,795 4,092 7.2 7.0 7.3
9 56,831 4,241 7.5 7.0 7.3
10 56,190 4,312 7.7 7.0 7.3
11 53,940 4,275 7.9 6.9 7.3
12 53,924 4,890 9.1 6.9 7.2
13 57,299 7,397 12.9 6.8 7.1
14 63,955 12,978 20.3 6.7 7.1
15 65,676 16,272 24.8 6.7 7.0
16 52,642 12,434 23.6 6.6 6.9
17 24,387 3,553 14.6 6.5 6.8