« prev   random   next »

0
0

PELOSI RESPONDS TO GETTING OWNED BY TRUMP

By jazz_music follow jazz_music   2020 Apr 29, 6:43am 661 views   9 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    



1   Tenpoundbass   ignore (16)   2020 Apr 29, 7:00am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

It's funny Trump has a whole treasure trove of dumb shit Liberals have said and done, he's had their number since day one. Now all the Democrats have is Trump's synonymous use of "Disinfectant" when "ASKING" a "Doctor" of something exists, that would act like a "Disinfectant" that "Doctors" could locally apply to affected tissue to get rid of the corona virus.

Every Liberal scumbag from here to Timbuktu is going to harp and squawk about Trump saying drink bleach from now until November. While Trump keeps out classing them in every way and delivering.

2   Onvacation   ignore (6)   2020 Apr 29, 7:54am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Are you still pushing the Russian collusion narrative?

People should be for something instead of against Trump and America.

ps: Nancy is losing it.
3   marcus   ignore (11)   2020 Apr 29, 8:03am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

:
Perhaps this is what Pence not wearing the mask was supposed to distract us from ?

Sorry Mike, nobody can dominate a news cycle the way your boss can.
4   Misc   ignore (0)   2020 Apr 29, 8:29am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

I agree with the senate committee that the intelligence community was correct that Russia was trying to influence our election in favor of Trump

I agree with Trump that the intelligence community was scum. Primarily by not having a single member of that community mention anything about the millions upon millions of illegals trying to influence our election in favor of Hillary.

I disagree with Pelosi that there is some sort of Trump/Russian collusion. Mueller and 40 full time FBI agents over the course of two years proved there was no collusion.
5   jazz_music   ignore (13)   2020 Apr 29, 11:10am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Onvacation says
Are you still pushing the Russian collusion narrative?
Ttrump himself invented that narrative. Collusion does exist in the real estate business.

... collusion "is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law."[81][82] They also investigated if members of the Trump campaign "coordinated" with Russia, using the definition of "coordination" as having "an agreement – tacit or express – between the Trump campaign and the Russian government on election interference." Investigators further elaborated that merely having "two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other's actions or interests" was not enough to establish coordination.[83][84]

The investigation found there were over 100 contacts between Trump campaign advisors and individuals affiliated with the Russian government, before and after the election, but the evidence was insufficient to show an illegal conspiracy.[85] The New York Times estimated as many as 140 contacts between "Mr. Trump and his associates and Russian nationals and WikiLeaks or their intermediaries" in the report.[86]

The special counsel identified two methods the Russian government tried to communicate with the Trump campaign. "The investigation identified two different forms of connections between the IRA and members of the Trump Campaign. [...] First, on multiple occasions, members and surrogates of the Trump Campaign promoted – typically by linking, retweeting, or similar methods of reposting – pro-Trump or anti-Clinton content published by the IRA through IRA-controlled social media accounts. Additionally, in a few instances, IRA employees represented themselves as U.S. persons to communicate with members of the Trump Campaign in an effort to seek assistance and coordination on IRA-organized political rallies inside the United States", the report states.[68]

Secondly, the report details a meeting at Trump Tower in June 2016. The intent of the meeting was to exchange "dirt" on the Clinton campaign. There was speculation that Trump Jr. told his father. However, the special counsel could not find any evidence that he did.[68] The office declined to pursue charges for two reasons: the office "did not obtain admissible evidence" that would meet the burden of proof principle beyond a reasonable doubt that the campaign officials acted with general knowledge about the illegality of their conduct; secondly, the office expected difficulty in valuing the promised information that "exceeded the threshold for a criminal violation" of $2,000 for a criminal violation and $25,000 for a felony punishment.[87]

The Report cited several impediments to investigators' ability to acquire information, including witnesses invoking their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, witnesses deleting electronic communications or using encrypted or self-destructing messaging apps, limitations of interviewing attorneys or individuals asserting they were members of the media, information obtained through subpoenas that was screened from investigators due to legal privilege, and false or incomplete testimony provided by witnesses.[7][8][88][9][89]

While conspiracy/coordination was not proven, Mueller's report left many unanswered questions, such as whether the myriad secret contacts between Trump associates and Russians, which they lied about, constituted, using Mueller's words, "a third avenue of attempted Russian interference with or influence on the 2016 presidential election"?

Benjamin Wittes has written about this:
Put another way, what is the story these contacts tell if it's not one of active coordination? They surely aren't, in the aggregate, innocent. They aren't normal business practice for a presidential campaign. When Mueller asks whether they constituted some sort of third avenue for Russian interference, he's really asking, in the prosecutorial language available to him, what to make of them.... To my mind, anyway, that's the story Mueller told in this section. It may not be a crime, but it is a very deep betrayal


source is wikipedia (spare me your opinion of the source)
6   Misc   ignore (0)   2020 Apr 29, 11:22am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Best thing is to have Mueller explain it to Wiki
7   Onvacation   ignore (6)   2020 Apr 29, 11:25am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

jazz_music says
source is wikipedia

So you got nothing. There was no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

If you want Russian collusion go look into the Clinton foundation and find out why the Russians donated millions and paid Bill exorbitant speaking fees while Hillary was secretary of state.
8   jazz_music   ignore (13)   2020 Apr 29, 11:32am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Onvacation says
So you got nothing
I not only got something, I got a waaaaaay better comment than a partisan hack.

Look there's a bibliography.

noun,
plural
bib·li·og·ra·phies.

a complete or selective list of works compiled upon some common principle, as authorship, subject, place of publication, or printer.
a list of source materials that are used or consulted in the preparation of a work or that are referred to in the text.
9   Onvacation   ignore (6)   2020 Apr 29, 5:41pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

jazz_music says
a partisan hack.

At least they have a smart phone and aren't hungry.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions