Comments 1 - 10 of 10 Search these comments
" In what obviously came as a shock to many, the Senate recently voted on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (AOC) so-called “Green New Deal,” and wouldn’t you know it – not a single member of Congress, including Democrats, voted in favor of it.
With a final vote of 0-57, with all 43 Democrats simply voting “present,” the cow fart-banning, fossil fuel-eradicating, economy-destroying socialist mess was finally put to rest – much to the chagrin of AOC, who almost immediately chastised all of her colleagues for not supporting her pipe dream legislation."
Yes, but that is not the point of AGW.
If the AGW folks really believed what they spout, they would be eager to work with people who do not believe in AGW but do recognize pollution and resource depletion as serious problems. After all, renewable energy like wind, solar, geo-thermal, and better nuclear power address both pollution and any AGW. However, the most effective approach would be to limit 1st World population to a renewable resource sustainable level. But that last point is the rub. The AGW crowd does not want any solutions other them vote Democrat, and Democrats are also for unfettered illegal immigration. Notice that all proponents of AGW on this blog can be distilled into these two strategies: Always keep the issue to arguing with deniers, and never talk about solutions other than vote Democrat.
Except renewables won't work and are actually worse for the environment.
Renewables prices will continue to fall, including batteries.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-08-30-nasa-admits-climate-change-not-caused-by-suvs-fossil-fuels.html?fbclid=IwAR3kjBBGogkgmc6tT9QQW2uZQ1WwuiKCTndfLXIIqezJyzK2vFetqtoaYvg