patrick.net

NoCoupForYou says

Why is a company that should be concerned with moving product, so concerned with pushing LGBTQ propaganda?

Ever consider the possibility that they are being offered incentives to do this, like either lots of money, or threats of regulatory retaliation if they don't.

If there's one thing i've learned in 20 years of being in Silicon Valley, is that whistle-blowers are few and far between and the world is filled almost exclusively with pussies.

Ever wonder why Mark Fuckerberg kowtows to censorship when it just damages the company's reputation, drives users off the site and pisses off people? Is that an intelligent business decision? Corporations are infiltrated, people are blackmailed, and some people just work for the intelligence agencies directly or indirectly.

Some moron in marketing thought gay shit will make money.

Liberals live in bubbles, they don’t realize how outside world functions.

Fortwaynemobile says

Some moron in marketing thought gay shit will make money.

Liberals live in bubbles, they don’t realize how outside world functions.

Um, it's a possibility, but I don't think generally marketers are that stupid. I'm an engineer, I am stupid. If I could make a machine that could turn lead into gold, I'd need a marketer to sell it.

When I was a junior engineer facing layoffs at RCA I was appalled that they were hiring marketers and getting rid of engineers. I told my boss "WTF? If they want to survive they need to make new and better products!" and he explained to me "stupid kid, we can't sell what we have now - why do we need new products?" And then I was enlightened.

Ah life, filled with somebody telling you how stupid you are, and having to realize they are right!

Get Woke Go Broke - we've all heard it - you think a marketer hasn't? Maybe, but I have a hard time believing it. Here's a possibility, the LGBTQ BS is increasing sales. Look at Proctor and Gamble's stock, they own Gillette. Then again, the market can remain irrational for longer than you can stay solvent.

I think the reason is primarily that the marketing department at coca cola is mostly gay.

Secondly, the management itself is very gay, though not as much as marketing.

Third, the general public thinks that they are being "tolerant" by approving of an acquired vice. But that's just because they don't really understand.

Patrick says

Third, the general public thinks that they are being "tolerant" by approving of an acquired vice.

Again I disagree with this. My cousin is gay and we were discussing it and he pointed out to me (20 years ago) "who would CHOSE to be hated by common society for their sexual kink, which they are stuck with if they aren't absolutely stuck with it? If it was just a preference?" I think that was a very good point, 20 years ago.

Also Patrick, I have been told you locked down this site a bit to eliminate trolls and PR targeting. I really do know how to eliminate that, I think. I'll pay for the patent to be filed, if you're interested in implementing it. My cousin is a patent attorney - a good one. I have lots of great ideas but not enough time or confidence to implement them. My cousin won't file a patent without a cut and without confidence it will be actually used. I'll file the patent, give you complete use of it, and I will implement it in my own way.

You will have no obligation to me and my cousin - you would be proof of concept, that's it, if you find the concept worthwhile. I need somebody to tell me my idea is stupid, or worthwhile. I am pretty confident I know exactly how to eliminate spam and propaganda but it does require a pretty hefty database, that is fast.

I would appreciate it if you could say "go to hell scammer" if you think I am. I inquired once, I'll try again if I get no response. I just figure you haven't read what I wrote.