0
0

Deep State is real, but it's your FRIEND...


 invite response                
2019 Oct 23, 11:07am   975 views  3 comments

by richwicks   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/20/opinion/trump-impeachment-testimony.html

Apparently the pricks that have been keeping the US at eternal war for the last 18 years, have staged multiple false flags (both internally and externally to the nation), who run the propaganda outlets that some people still think is actual "news", who overlook blatant corruption from lying us into a war in Iraq to pay for play during Clinton's election campaign taking bribes through her "charity".

Apparently they are just trying to help...

Here, for those of you that can't get through the paywall, I can: Hint: use wget.... It's just a blatant propaganda piece anyhow.

President Trump is right: The deep state is alive and well. But it is not the sinister, antidemocratic cabal of his fever dreams. It is, rather, a collection of patriotic public servants — career diplomats, scientists, intelligence officers and others — who, from within the bowels of this corrupt and corrupting administration, have somehow remembered that their duty is to protect the interests, not of a particular leader, but of the American people.

Fiona Hill, Michael McKinley and the whistle-blower who effectively initiated the impeachment investigation — when these folks saw something suspicious, they said something. Their aim was not to bring down Mr. Trump out of personal or political animus but to rescue the Republic from his excesses. Those who refuse to silently indulge this president’s worst impulses qualify as heroes — and deserve our gratitude.

Throughout the Trump presidency, there has been a trickle of fed-up individuals willing to step up and protest the administration’s war on science, expertise and facts.

In July, Rod Schoonover left his job as an analyst for the State Department after the administration blocked the submission to Congress of his report on the national security implications of climate change.

In July 2017, Joel Clement, formerly the director of the Office of Policy Analysis at the Interior Department, filed a whistle-blower complaint alleging that the administration had reassigned him to an accounting position in retaliation for publicly speaking out on the potential dangers of climate change to Alaska Native communities.

In August, Lewis Ziska, a veteran plant physiologist with the Agriculture Department, quit in protest over the administration’s efforts to bury his findings about the negative impact of rising levels of carbon dioxide on the nutrient content of rice. “You get the sense that things have changed, that this is not a place for you to be exploring things that don’t agree with someone’s political views,” Mr. Ziska told Politico at the time. “That’s so sad. I can’t even begin to tell you how sad that is.”

With an impeachment inquiry underway in the House, the risks of breaking ranks with the president are higher than ever. Mr. Trump prides himself on punching back against perceived enemies, publicly suggesting that “spies” and “traitors” and people who turn “rat” deserve to have their lives and their families destroyed. Small wonder that few congressional Republicans have dared express even gentle concern over Mr. Trump’s increasingly erratic behavior.

But still the patriots come. Top of the list, of course, is the still-anonymous whistle-blower who touched off the impeachment drama by registering his concerns about Mr. Trump’s clandestine effort to pressure Ukraine into conducting investigations that would benefit his re-election campaign. The concerns enumerated in the complaint have since been verified and magnified by multiple administration insiders, despite the White House’s stonewalling mandate.

On Monday, Congress heard from Ms. Hill, the former top national security adviser on Russia and Europe, who detailed how Mr. Trump had done an end run around his own national security team, putting Ukraine policy in the hands of unqualified dilettantes like Gordon Sondland, whose $1 million donation to the Trump inaugural basically bought him the title of ambassador to the European Union, and Rudy Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer and favorite henchman.

On Wednesday, Mr. McKinley, a top adviser to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo until this month, told Congress that he’d resigned in frustration over the administration’s disparaging and shunting aside career diplomats, as well as its using ambassadors overseas to advance the president’s re-election aims. (He put it more diplomatically, as one would expect.)

A week and a half ago, Marie Yovanovitch, the former ambassador to Ukraine, testified that Mr. Trump prematurely recalled her in May, allegedly as a result of a whisper campaign by Mr. Giuliani and some of his associates, two of whom were arrested Oct. 9 on federal charges of violating campaign finance laws. “I do not know Mr. Giuliani’s motives for attacking me,” Ms. Yovanovitch told lawmakers. “But individuals who have been named in the press as contacts of Mr. Giuliani may well have believed that their personal financial ambitions were stymied by our anti-corruption policy in Ukraine.”

Presumably, Ms. Yovanovitch, a veteran diplomat and actual expert on Ukraine, had also proved an annoying hindrance to Mr. Giuliani pursuing his shadow agenda.

Right on cue, Mr. Trump’s lackeys are responding to such breaches of fealty by going on the attack. In a media briefing on Thursday, the White House acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, dismissed the witnesses who had spoken to impeachment investigators: “What you are seeing now, I believe, is a group of mostly career bureaucrats who are saying, ‘You know what, I don’t like President Trump’s politics, so I’m going to participate in this witch hunt.’”

That may be what Mr. Mulvaney hears when he listens to these men and women. But many, many others will hear veteran public servants appalled by an administration that continues to subvert the public interest to the whims of a president who has mistaken himself for a king.

This is Mr. Trump’s deep state. For the sake of the nation, the American public should be clamoring for more patriots to join the conspiracy.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com .

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.
Correction: Oct. 22, 2019

An earlier version of this editorial misstated when Joel Clement, an Interior Department official, filed a whistle-blower complaint. It was July 2017, not July of this year.

Michelle Cottle is a member of the editorial board. @mcottle

Comments 1 - 3 of 3        Search these comments

1   Ceffer   2019 Oct 23, 11:12am  

The usual boring LIbbyFuck Flip. The real criminals are the 'patriots', upending democracy because they in their infinite wisdom KNOW what's best for us!

They must be scared, they usually don't acknowledge their existence so openly, much less attempt a publicity stunt to defend it.
2   richwicks   2019 Oct 23, 11:34am  

Ceffer says
The usual boring LIbbyFuck Flip. The real criminals are the 'patriots', upending democracy because they in their infinite wisdom KNOW what's best for us!

They must be scared, they usually don't acknowledge their existence so openly, much less attempt a publicity stunt to defend it.


I think you're incorrect in this. It's not a bunch of liberal assholes that are "the deep state" - it's just a bunch of criminals. The same people that allowed George W. Bush to "courageously" lie us into the Iraq war, were the same douchebags that let Obama lie us into bombing Libya and attacking Syria.

The people that voted for Obama in 2008 were pissed off with Bush. They were disgusted that a president could lie the nation into a war, and they wanted some accountability. On top of that, Bush was in office and instead of prosecuting criminal malfeasance in the banking sector, implemented TARP - i.e. the US taxpayer, payed for a bunch of criminal scumbags.

Obama was no better. That asshole lied us into two wars, bombing 7 nations over 8 years, caused the refugee crisis, had his AG say publicly that he would NEVER prosecute a banker, and moved the discussion to gay marriage and national discussion on transgendered bathrooms - as if anybody give a crap about these "issues".

You know who the MAJORITY of people who voted for Trump are? They aren't "conservatives", they aren't "republicans", they are people that think Obama and Bush Jr were just common criminals, and our federal government is run by a mafia. They just call this mafia "the deep state", and they want it excised any way possible. I don't know what so many people think a classic 1960's NYC democrat is a "far right wing zealot" today, people have weak minds and just adopt the propaganda they hear over and over again.
3   Patrick   2019 Oct 27, 10:29am  

http://www.unz.com/ishamir/the-plundering-of-ukraine/

Top Dems are involved in the plundering of the Ukraine: new names, mind-boggling accounts. The mysterious ‘whistleblower’ whose report had unleashed the impeachment is named in the exclusive interview given to the Unz Review by a prominent Ukrainian politician, an ex-Member of Parliament of four terms, a candidate for Ukraine’s presidency, Oleg Tsarev. ...

This man was (perhaps) a CIA asset, but he also was a close associate of George Soros, and a Ukrainian high-ranking official. His name is Mr Alexander Daniluk. He is also the man the investigation of Sam Kislin and of the DoJ had led to, the Finance Minister of Ukraine at the time, the man who was responsible for the embezzlement of three billion US taxpayer’s best dollars. The DoJ issued an order for his arrest. Naturally he is devoted to Biden personally, and to the Dems in general. I would not trust his version of the phone call at all.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions