patrick.net

Trump was right to ask the Ukrainians to look into Biden's manipulating of their internal politics for the benefit of his son.

Payment to absentee Board Member is just another way of ENGINIRING BRIBE.
As long as recipient pay local and US taxes all seems fine.
Same with speeches or advances on books which never be profitable for publisher. Publisher can write off tax loss (it calls: business risk) and recipient simply pay tax on advances. All is fine with law. Who provide cash is another topic.

REpro says

As long as recipient pay local and US taxes all seems fine.
Same with speeches or advances on books which never be profitable for publisher.

Paying taxes on earnings doesn't absolve you from earning that money lawfully. Al Capone was convicted of not paying taxes because that was the easiest way to convict him; it's not that racketeering is a legal business.

Being paid for speeches is legal if that payment isn't a front laundering payment for illegal activity. If you are being paid outlandish fees for speeches or advances on books that are never profitable, those are indicators that they payment might be part of a money laundering scheme.

Please tell us what special qualities (that are legal) did Hunter Biden possess that would qualify him to sit on that board. Great business acumen? Connections to other companies in similar or complementary fields? Great skill or knowledge in oil and gas or energy fields?

SunnyvaleCA says

REpro says

As long as recipient pay local and US taxes all seems fine.
Same with speeches or advances on books which never be profitable for publisher.

Paying taxes on earnings doesn't absolve you from earning that money lawfully. Al Capone was convicted of not paying taxes because that was the easiest way to convict him; it's not that racketeering is a legal business.

Being paid for speeches is legal if that payment isn't a front laundering payment for illegal activity. If you are being paid outlandish fees for speeches or advances on books that are never profitable, those are indicators that they payment might be part of a money laundering scheme.

How $500K payment to Clinton for speech in Russia fit that bag?
How "pay to play" Clinton's Foundation fit that bag?
How $65M advances on Obamas book which can fetch $45M a the best prediction in sales, not profit, (including over 116K public libraries) fit that bag?

Interesting: that statement was recorded by Shokin to help Dmytro Firtash, who's basically one of two top "Putin's men" in Ukraine and knows a lot about the gas-related corruption schemes used to buy politicians in Europe, to battle the extradition to US from Austria. Russia does not want that extradition to happen, because he might spill the bins on all the Euro fucks sucking on Putin's lower middle teat.

The statement has no date, but since the final court hearing on DF's appeal was being held in Feb 2017 I think this is when it was made.

DF is also connected to Manafort, who was instrumental in installing Putin's dick puppet Yanukovich as President of Ukraine in 2010.

Game of Thrones is child's play compared to these fucks.

Yep really bad they tried to get the prosecutor removed,...in conjunction with the European Union, IMF, State Dept. and others. Why? Because he wouldn't investigate corruption.

Or... exactly because he was investigating corruption, ie the appointment of Hunter Biden at $80,000/month to do nothing.

The statement has no date, but since the final court hearing on DF's appeal was being held in Feb 2017 I think this is when it was made.

The statement has a date and Notary stamp and signatures on full version on source link provided.

REpro says

The statement has no date, but since the final court hearing on DF's appeal was being held in Feb 2017 I think this is when it was made.

The statement has a date and Notary stamp and signatures on full version on source link provided.

I don't see the date there. What is it?