2
0

Facebook declares itself a publisher - not free speech platform


 invite response                
2019 Sep 20, 2:15pm   1,598 views  12 comments

by FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.rt.com/usa/469209-facebook-publisher-laura-loomer-lawsuit/

Saw this posted on facebook today. Facebook finally came out of the closet about it.

For those who don't realize how big this is. This is a moment for another company to come in, declare itself a platform, and win huge market share. Or even better, a conservative facebook, that'll drop facebook into nothing territory. I bet if Patrick.net had nicer styling and some investor money, it could be huge.

Comments 1 - 12 of 12        Search these comments

1   Onvacation   2019 Sep 20, 2:21pm  

FortWayneIndiana says
if Patrick.net had nicer styling

What you talkin' 'bout?
2   komputodo   2019 Sep 20, 2:43pm  

Onvacation says
What you talkin' 'bout?

WILLIS
3   FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut   2019 Sep 20, 2:53pm  

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
IT!'S! TELLING! LIES! ABOUT! ME!

FACEBOOK IS DEFAMING ME!


ITS FUCKING MISGENDERING ME!!!!!! I"M A FUCKING APACHE HELICOPTER!!!!

Why is this so hard?
4   FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden   2019 Sep 20, 4:11pm  

Facebook bans conservative, republican, pro second amendment, and many other basics.

HEYYOU says
Bet a conservative platform would ban Independents,they can't handle the truth
5   CBOEtrader   2019 Sep 20, 4:33pm  

Fortwaynemobile says
Facebook bans conservative, republican, pro second amendment, and many other basics.

HEYYOU says
Bet a conservative platform would ban Independents,they can't handle the truth


Even bans leftists who disagree w the narrative.

How anyone cant see the tyranny coming is beyond me
6   Shaman   2019 Sep 20, 4:39pm  

This really does open up vast swaths of market share for another more open company.
But it probably won’t be replaced because that would require users to abandon years of saved photos, contacts, and all their friends. You’d need a movement. Perhaps assisted by a data mine operation. Say you wanted to switch to this new competitor: call it GreatBook. GreatBook would accept your Facebook information, use it to download all your content from Facebook, and then build you a new profile on GreatBook.
For the user it would be as simple as registering and accepting a new EULA and all their stuff would be transferred over to the new service.

That’s what it would take to replace Facebook. Make it super easy, let the users keep all their photos and info, and auto populate their Facebook friends with The friends who sign up for GreatBook. In theory it would be a simple swap.
7   ignoreme   2019 Sep 20, 7:49pm  

It doesn’t matter, leftist don’t have to follow the law. This case will be dismissed based on the “publisher” argument, then somebody will sue for libel and that will be dismissed by another leftist CA judge because they are a platform.

Just accept that you need to bake their gay cakes and wax their tranny balls while the leftist can ban you, demonitize you, refuse payment processing, and drop your hosting if you complain about it.
8   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Sep 20, 8:07pm  

FortWayneIndiana says
Saw this posted on facebook today. Facebook finally came out of the closet about it.


If true, it means Facebook is now liable for everything on the site.

For more than a decade, Social Media has tried to pretend it's neither a publisher or a platform.

It's high time the FCC and FTC gave 30 days to Twitter, Google, etc. to declare themselves one or the other.
9   CBOEtrader   2019 Sep 20, 8:29pm  

Quigley says
Make it super easy, let the users keep all their photos and info, and auto populate their Facebook friends with The friends who sign up for GreatBook.


I'll bet FB claims ownership of your content, and would have anti scrapping rules in place. Yelp scraping software gets around but that's for private use (csvs of local restaurant data).

Especially now that they call themselves a pulisher, I'll bet a company like in your suggestion would be sued quick. (I'd still try it though). @patrick, do you like to live dangerously?
10   Patrick   2019 Sep 20, 8:45pm  

I'm not a publisher. I just run a forum where anyone can say almost anything. There is one primary rule: don't personally attack the other users.

Other rules are just the ordinary stuff every site has to deal with: no kiddie porn, no deliberate copyright infringement (excerpts for discussion are protected by law), no spam.

I don't have anti-scraping rules. Go for it if you like. In fact, I'm working on a json interface so anyone can programatically scrape the site much more easily.
12   RWSGFY   2019 Sep 21, 7:27am  

In reality it's an advertising company. GOOG too.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions