Comments 1 - 10 of 10 Search these comments
Lewis proposes that YouTube should consider not only reviewing the content of the channels identified in the report, but the people they host and what their guests say.
“YouTube is choosing to continue to endorse the content of these people who are delivering really harmful messages,” she said. “It would be an opportune time to make their standards stricter for people that have that level of influence.”
Over 10,000 active viewers watched a January debate between white nationalist Richard Spencer and a conspiracy theorist who goes by the name Sargon of Akkad. The discussion topic was whether science proves whites are more intelligent because of genetic superiority. There was little disagreement; both sides agreed on the superiority of the white race.
Molyneux strikes me as a cult leader type, but apparently Rubin is evil just for interviewing him. But we can't have any live chats with the public participating, that leads to extremism. The feminist lecturing the students one-way is a much better model:
Lewis proposes that YouTube should consider not only reviewing the content of the channels identified in the report, but the people they host and what their guests say.
“YouTube is choosing to continue to endorse the content of these people who are delivering really harmful messages,” she said. “It would be an opportune time to make their standards stricter for people that have that level of influence.”
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/sep/18/report-youtubes-alternative-influence-network-breeds-rightwing-radicalisation
De-platforming is the Alt-Left's Codeword for banning and censorship:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/04/alex-jones-infowars-social-media-ban