Comments 1 - 9 of 9 Search these comments
At least Ivanka's clothing line isn't a charitable foundation formed by a husband who is an ex two term President, ostensibly for the purpose of using his status (and political skills) to do some good in the world. Screw the "deep state" and their pretensions. Am I right ?
This all means there is no possible conflict of interest with Ivanka somehow?
Where as with Ivanka the pure greed and corruption implied without any pretensions of better intentions is more honest. With the Trump's, it's not a conflict of interest becasue the primary goal is enriching themselves. And there is no complicated supposed do gooder intentions hiding that.
It's just one of the many things that are "refreshing™ about Trump.
Aren't you annoyed by people that try so hard to do good in the world ?
Where as with Ivanka the pure greed and corruption implied without any pretensions of better intentions is more honest. With the Trump's, it's not a conflict of interest becasue the primary goal is enriching themselves. And there is no complicated supposed do gooder intentions hiding that.
It's just one of the many things that are "refreshing™ about Trump.
Republicans elected a president
Bygone Democratic misdeeds
"SHANGHAI — Ivanka Trump’s brand continues to win foreign trademarks in China and the Philippines, adding to questions about conflicts of interest at the White House, The Associated Press has found."
“Ivanka Trump’s refusal to divest from her business is especially troubling as the Ivanka brand continues to expand its business in foreign countries,” Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said in an email Monday. “It raises significant questions about corruption, as it invites the possibility that she could be benefiting financially from her position and her father’s presidency or that she could be influenced in her policy work by countries’ treatment of her business.”
Amazing that all these trademarks are being approved in the middle of trade negotiations. I'm sure that's just a coincidence, right?