1
0

Why do Studies assume everyone is as stupid as a gullible Liberal?


 invite response                
2018 Mar 16, 6:45am   2,170 views  6 comments

by Tenpoundbass   ➕follow (7)   💰tip   ignore  

How can you have modern humans first that mated with other species. It would be the intermating of those species that gave rise to modern man.
Otherwise there's a failed Human species out there that otherwise didn't mate with other species.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/03/15/humans-bred-with-this-mysterious-species-more-than-once-new-study-shows/?utm_term=.patrick.net

Comments 1 - 6 of 6        Search these comments

1   Patrick   2018 Mar 16, 7:40am  

I think what scientists should have said is that the "people with the bulk of modern humans' genes" instead of "modern humans".

Because you're right: a thing mixed with another thing is no longer the same thing.

Technically correct is the best kind of correct, as programmers sometimes say.
2   just_passing_through   2018 Mar 16, 8:53am  

The13thRussianBot says
How can you have modern humans first that mated with other species.


Don't have time to read at the moment but suspect that the wash post is just a bit clueless. This is my field though so I'll clarify.

Neanderthals and Denisovans were 'human' and the same 'species' as us. Different sub-species...

We are, "Homo sapiens sapiens"...
3   Ceffer   2018 Mar 16, 9:00am  

Just like liberals. Everybody HAS to be homos.
4   Tenpoundbass   2018 Mar 16, 5:31pm  

just_passing_through says
Neanderthals and Denisovans were 'human' and the same 'species' as us. Different sub-species...


Asians are from Java and Peking Man.
5   marcus   2018 Mar 16, 11:34pm  

When I read this the other day, I assumed the categories referred to the arrow head end of the arrow but are written behind the arrow because that's where the space is. But then I'm just a dumb educated person (read "liberal").

Why did I assume that ? Because of the basis of the obvious and silly inference you're making.

Maybe your title should be, "Why do elitist liberal academic types assume the readers of their work are literate ?"

Patrick says
Technically correct is the best kind of correct, as programmers sometimes say.


May be true. But then it's also true that some of us clearly spend too much time programming.
6   bob2356   2018 Mar 17, 4:31am  

The13thRussianBot says
How can you have modern humans first that mated with other species. It would be the intermating of those species that gave rise to modern man.
Otherwise there's a failed Human species out there that otherwise didn't mate with other species.


You could have saved yourself a lot of mental anguish if you bothered to learn what the word species actually means. If they can intermate then they ARE the same species. That's the definition of species, producing fertile offspring.

Why do Studies assume everyone no one is as stupid willfully ignorant as gullible Liberal conservatives?

See all fixed.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions