0
0

Peter Schiff: 2017 GDP Growth Looks like Obama 2.0


 invite response                
2018 Jan 9, 9:00pm   1,632 views  11 comments

by WatermelonUniversity   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

Pathetic "growth" stupid republicans have been ranting and raving about.
www.youtube.com/embed/08zli3b2pew

Comments 1 - 11 of 11        Search these comments

1   Strategist   2018 Jan 9, 9:07pm  

Where's the crash Peter Shitt? ROFL.
Anyone who took this idiot's advise must be bankrupt by now.
2   WatermelonUniversity   2018 Jan 9, 9:13pm  

Strategist says
Where's the crash Peter Shitt? ROFL.
Anyone who took this idiot's advise must be bankrupt by now.


totally irrelevant. his predictions don't make what he said about Trump's GDP less true: it sucks ass.
3   mell   2018 Jan 9, 9:20pm  

Actually his funds did well in 2016 and 2017. Not everybody can be a 1000000% returning genius. As long as the broader market and index funds return 10+%, most real hedge funds will be unpopular as their original aim is to make high single digit returns or more (in any market) while hedging most risk (long and short). There are many hedge funds who are just long fanboy tech stocks and they have been doing well, but they are not really Hedge funds.
4   Strategist   2018 Jan 9, 9:22pm  

BorderPatrol says
Strategist says
Where's the crash Peter Shitt? ROFL.
Anyone who took this idiot's advise must be bankrupt by now.


totally irrelevant. his predictions don't make what he said about Trump's GDP less true: it sucks ass.


Why not take predictions from a proven winner like Warren Buffett? He said we are in for some good growth.
5   Strategist   2018 Jan 9, 9:28pm  

Strategist says
BorderPatrol says
Strategist says
Where's the crash Peter Shitt? ROFL.
Anyone who took this idiot's advise must be bankrupt by now.


totally irrelevant. his predictions don't make what he said about Trump's GDP less true: it sucks ass.


Why not take predictions from a proven winner like Warren Buffett? He said we are in for some good growth.


The only reason you give Peter Schitt your 2 cents, is because you have already made the emotional decision that the economy will collapse, and are looking for someone to back you up.
6   mell   2018 Jan 9, 9:34pm  

Strategist says
The only reason you give Peter Schitt your 2 cents, is because you have already made the emotional decision that the economy will collapse, and are looking for someone to back you up.


He's invested in gold and Asia. So he's not betting on a world-wide collapse, Logan would call him "Anti-American bear" ;)
7   WatermelonUniversity   2018 Jan 9, 9:38pm  

Strategist says
Why not take predictions from a proven winner like Warren Buffett? He said we are in for some good growth.


the video is not about any predictions. watch before commenting next time.
8   WatermelonUniversity   2018 Jan 9, 9:40pm  

Schiff's time frame has been off since 2006 but he's right on many things.

no one can time the market so if you think he's not worth listening to because his timing is not correct the joke is on you!
9   mell   2018 Jan 9, 9:44pm  

BorderPatrol says
Schiff's time frame has been off since 2006 but he's right on many things.

no one can time the market so if you think he's not worth listening to because his timing is not correct the joke is on you!


Also if you have enough leverage/money you only need to be right once and bet hard to retire. Few did in 2008. PS underestimated the power/resilience and value-store proposition of the world reserve currency. To some extent the currencies of major western and Asian economic powerhouses are more resilient to QE. But many ailing economies that tried to emulate the Fed's hardcore QE got obliterated and their currency devalued into nothingness. The Fed played their hand well.
10   Strategist   2018 Jan 9, 9:54pm  

BorderPatrol says
Schiff's time frame has been off since 2006 but he's right on many things.

no one can time the market so if you think he's not worth listening to because his timing is not correct the joke is on you!


ROFL. Since 2006? That's not enough for you? If you think the worst forecaster of stocks since 2006 is worth listening to, go ahead, be my guest. Just make sure you keep enough for a bullet or a bankruptcy lawyer.
11   WatermelonUniversity   2018 Jan 9, 10:22pm  

Strategist says
ROFL. Since 2006? That's not enough for you? If you think the worst forecaster of stocks since 2006 is worth listening to, go ahead, be my guest. Just make sure you keep enough for a bullet or a bankruptcy lawyer.


he is many times richer than you so i'm pretty sure he has the last laugh.

you on the other hand, still can't separate predictions from facts.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions