2
0

How YouTube censors via de-monetisation


 invite response                
2017 Dec 13, 7:47am   1,810 views  2 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sqbsph
Google, some months ago, put out a job posting which required a number of different people to work on one project. Google claimed in the posting that they needed a third party company to work as “web search evaluators.” My contact worked for the unnamed company that put in for the job and was accepted by Google. My contact didn’t know what to expect from the job, but was told to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement in order to be a part of it. My contact accepted and signed the NDA. That is when things changed.

Once the NDA was signed, my contact found that they weren’t working as a “web search evaluator.” They were demonetizing YouTube videos. They would be given YouTube videos to review and had a checklist of sorts to go through to be sure the video fit (or didn’t fit) certain criteria. You can see screenshots from my contact’s end in this post via Imgur.

One of the most important things to take away from this is that if the person reviewing the video wouldn’t feel comfortable watching the video in public, it should automatically be demonetized. My contact stated that the company told them that if they were on the fence about a video and didn’t really know if it violated any of YouTube’s new “rules,” to demonetize the video anyway. Also, if the reviewer doesn’t find anything listed that’s wrong with the video, they are allowed to insert their own personal belief on something that is sensitive or inappropriate and can have the video demonetized that way, as well.

Here are the screenshots from the third party company’s viewpoint:

DEMONETIZATION LEAKED SCREENSHOTS: https://imgur.com/a/uTLTS




See the imgur.com link above for other instructions.

#censorship

Comments 1 - 2 of 2        Search these comments

1   NuttBoxer   2017 Dec 13, 9:22am  

On the surface, the criteria in the image seems pretty standard. I think the most telling sign something is wrong here is the NDA and the false title. The additional criteria you listed(not in the image) sounds very subjective. I'm surprised Google doesn't have a more well defined set of criteria that would prevent an auditor from abusing their authority here.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions