Please log in to view images

« prev   random   next »

3
1

I've been banned by dan8267. My first ban.

By komputodo follow komputodo   2017 Jun 24, 10:19am 11,010 views   56 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


You cannot comment here because the post author has banned you.

Comments 1 - 40 of 52    Next »    Last »

2   FortWayne   ignore (4)   2017 Jun 24, 10:25am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Congratulations, and welcome to the club.

3   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2017 Jun 24, 10:41am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Me too. But I was curious , why he continues to respond to my posts. i am assuming if you ban someone , you don't want to deal with them???

If I ban someone, it means I don't want to deal with them?

4   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostakovitch   ignore (52)   2017 Jun 24, 10:43am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Everyone's banned me except Patrick because the Pubah wuvs moi!

5   someone else   ignore (0)   2017 Jun 24, 10:51am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

You are unique, and have not seen you attack another user personally, ever. So why would anyone ban you?

6   just_dregalicious   ignore (2)   2017 Jun 24, 10:55am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

rando says

You are unique, and have not seen you attack another user personally, ever. So why would anyone ban you?

Exactly, AF is like a genre. Maybe some people don't get it.

7   Tenpoundbass   ignore (15)   2017 Jun 24, 11:20am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

I'm banned too, the White privileged side of me thinks it's an outrage.
But the virtue signalling side of me, realizes that We're way out of his league and make him nervous.
So while we're technically right most of the cases it makes him uncomfortable. So he gets the debate point.

8   Strategist   ignore (2)   2017 Jun 24, 11:33am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

komputodo says

I've been banned by dan8267. My first ban.

Congratulations on your victory. You obviously won an argument against him.

9   Strategist   ignore (2)   2017 Jun 24, 11:34am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Everyone is getting banned by Dan. He loves arguing with himself. It guarantees a victory every time.

10   Shaman   ignore (2)   2017 Jun 24, 11:40am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

It would be funny if it weren't so fucking pathetic. I think he's up to almost 40 users banned! Biggest snowflake of them all. It must be tough living with a micro penis.

11   Strategist   ignore (2)   2017 Jun 24, 11:46am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Quigley says

It must be tough living with a micro penis.

And no balls.

12   anonymous   ignore (null)   2017 Jun 24, 11:49am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Strategist says

It guarantees a victory every time.

This is why I love masturbation.

13   curious2   ignore (0)   2017 Jun 24, 12:35pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

lostand confused says

I was curious , why he continues to respond to my posts. i am assuming if you ban someone , you don't want to deal with them?

I'm curious too, why @Bellingham Bill (who bans me) chose to litter a thread I created to follow the published trades of a different User who has a much more successful record. I know people who have made their family fortunes by following Warren Buffett's trades, but they don't seem interested in following the trades of people who aren't Warren Buffett. I ended up having to ban BB, because the ban function is currently global rather than per thread, and there is currently no "delete" or "move" function to keep a thread on topic.

14   covid_shmovid   ignore (5)   2017 Jun 24, 12:57pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

curious2 says

and there is currently no "delete" or "move" function to keep a thread on topic.

Ad-hom button deletes messages pretty good. (evil laugh)

15   curious2   ignore (0)   2017 Jun 24, 1:10pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Straw Man says

Ad-hom button deletes messages pretty good. (evil laugh)

Yes, or at least it moves them to "comment jail", but I feel an aversion against making false accusations. I was once accused of marking a comment as "spam," even though I hadn't. (I had Disliked more than one comment by that user, and that activated somehow an automatic "spam" designation without ever clicking "spam".)

16   Y   ignore (3)   2017 Jun 24, 1:11pm     ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag      

Dan's been in a ban rage ever since georgies shuttered up...

17   curious2   ignore (0)   2017 Jun 24, 1:14pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

I think the OP ban might have something to do with this comment.

18   Strategist   ignore (2)   2017 Jun 24, 1:19pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

BlueSardine says

Dan's been in a ban rage ever since georgies shuttered up...

It's sad. Very very sad. I feel his pain. (Actually i don't, but i just like saying it)

19   RC2006   ignore (2)   2017 Jun 24, 1:35pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Same here.

Most people cant even reply to his posts so whats the point he is just taking up space?

20   Ceffer   ignore (5)   2017 Jun 24, 1:38pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Hmm, I am banned by BB, too. I think he is a day trader and only wants to talk about investment superstitions and gambling frenzies.

21   covid_shmovid   ignore (5)   2017 Jun 24, 2:34pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Let's all retaliate.

22   Done   ignore (1)   2017 Jun 24, 2:39pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

No dodge ball allowed the snowflakes will melt.

23   Done   ignore (1)   2017 Jun 24, 2:42pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

curious2 says

The issue is finding exactly what he said about investing in the haystack of his other comments. If you find specific trades and investment opinions, please comment & link in that thread.

No, I will pretty much comment where I want and let the snowflakes ban at will.....

24   Done   ignore (1)   2017 Jun 24, 2:53pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

curious2 says

The issue is finding exactly what he said about investing in the haystack of his other comments.

And most of that haystack you speak of the bulls have already ate and shit..... Oh, can I say shit I can't remember all the rules to free speech and who's opinion on free speech matters and who's don't.

25   bob2356   ignore (4)   2017 Jun 24, 3:21pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

komputodo says

I've been banned by dan8267. My first ban.

Everyone who doesn't worship the ground dan walks on has been banned by dan. You are in very good company along with everyone else who doesn't suck dan's ass.

26   komputodo   ignore (3)   2017 Jun 24, 6:55pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

curious2 says

I think the OP ban might have something to do with this comment.

That was posted in the NATIONAL POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS thread.

27   curious2   ignore (0)   2017 Jun 24, 7:22pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

komputodo says

curious2 says

I think the OP ban might have something to do with this comment.

That was posted in the NATIONAL POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS thread.

Yes, and I've never banned you.

28   HEY YOU   ignore (10)   2017 Jun 24, 7:23pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Don't piss off that Adorable APOCALYPSEFUCK!
I've heard he's an expert with a belt fed.

Quigley says

a micro penis.

I take that as an ad hominem attack even if it is true.

29   just_dregalicious   ignore (2)   2017 Jun 24, 7:35pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Straw Man says

Let's all retaliate.

Effin funny!

30   just_dregalicious   ignore (2)   2017 Jun 24, 7:38pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Dan's the only person I've ever used the former 'ignore' feature on. It was only because he kept posting pictures of gay guys and I didn't have enough brain bleach to handle it all.

I actually like his tech posts. The rest of the stuff - the long walls of text I usually just scroll past. After Patrick removed the ignores, I haven't noticed hairy dick when I've been scrolling so no reason to do so again even if I had that feature again...

31   PeopleUnited   ignore (1)   2017 Jun 24, 9:36pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Strategist says

komputodo says

I've been banned by dan8267. My first ban.

Congratulations on your victory. You obviously won an argument against him.

Yep. Here is more info.
http://chataboutyou.com/online-forum-bully

32   Heraclitusstudent   ignore (2)   2017 Jun 24, 9:48pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Dan is unable to have a rational discussion without getting his HUGE ego involved. He starts retching emotional hair balls whenever someone contradicts him.

33   Ceffer   ignore (5)   2017 Jun 24, 10:47pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

See, ever since you banned Ironman, Dan has all of his energies to turn on other forum members. At least Ironman sequestered him into pointless, endless, circumlocutory and repetitive ad hominem exchanges that could easily be glossed over.

34   FortWayne   ignore (4)   2017 Jun 25, 7:55am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Ceffer says

See, ever since you banned Ironman, Dan has all of his energies to turn on other forum members. At least Ironman sequestered him into pointless, endless, circumlocutory and repetitive ad hominem exchanges that could easily be glossed over.

A very good reason to bring back Ironman. Adds fun to the forum, and keeps Dan focused.

35   bob2356   ignore (4)   2017 Jun 25, 8:05am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

FortWayne says

A very good reason to bring back Ironman. Adds fun to the forum, and keeps Dan focused.

I agree, something I thought I would never say involving ftwayne. Dan needs something to focus on the 22 hours a day he is posting on patnet.

I also thought ironman was fun. I was always fine with trading hands (ok fingers) with him. If he got tedious there was always the option of just not responding. I actually respected the fact that he could find any tiny flaw in your argument.

36   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostakovitch   ignore (52)   2017 Jun 25, 9:10am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Ceffer says

See, ever since you banned Ironman, Dan has all of his energies to turn on other forum members. At least Ironman sequestered him into pointless, endless, circumlocutory and repetitive ad hominem exchanges that could easily be glossed over.

Oh, you refer to the PatNet goat-violation pavilion?

37   Ceffer   ignore (5)   2017 Jun 25, 9:48am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

That's right. There has been a refreshing lack of pictures of goats' assholes and overweight internet stalkers since Ironman left.

38   anonymous   ignore (null)   2017 Jun 25, 11:13am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag      

Ceffer says

See, ever since you banned Ironman, Dan has all of his energies to turn on other forum members. At least Ironman sequestered him into pointless, endless, circumlocutory and repetitive ad hominem exchanges that could easily be glossed over.

I miss it the way i miss the mushy drunks at the bar that will tell the same fucking story to anyone that may appear to be listening. Over and over and over again

39   Blurtman   ignore (1)   2017 Jun 25, 2:24pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

komputodo says

I've been banned by dan8267. My first ban.

No soup for you!

40   HEY YOU   ignore (10)   2017 Jun 25, 4:24pm     ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag      

komputodo,
Don't hurt the sensitive feelings of crybaby banners.

I'm having fun going after them because they have nothing but "You hurt my feelings, you're banned."
Someone needs to man up around here.

Comments 1 - 40 of 52    Next »    Last »


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions