Comments 1 - 14 of 14 Search these comments
This woman will be our first female President.
The Leftist nazis are giving her EXACTLY the right promotion to endear her as a victim of Leftist outrage, and her personality and charm will carry her the rest of the way. In 2024 she will have all the gravitas and backing a candidate could hope for. Her father's successful Presidency and reelection, and the resulting economic boom and return to vibrancy America experiences will convince voters to elect her in a landslide.
She will even get a lot of now-bitter Hillary voters.
Thats my prediction. It's pretty far out on the timeline, but some events have a gravity well so large that they send ripples backward.
www.youtube.com/embed/7mdIWaRi-7c
The administration can try and use Ivankah and Melania to appeal to women/the identity politics side of the equation, but the first family is so embroiled in controversy, and the previous first family was so well liked, I think it's pretty futile.
Is Melania still hiding in the tower?
Is Melania still hiding in the tower?
Yeah you liberal bastards must be proud. Pick on a defenseless 12 year old boy, and his mother like that.
I would say shame on you but it might make your day.
Poor poor Ivankah
A pawn in daddy's game
The products being rebranded
Remove the family name
The coffers begin to dwindle
The Party, not quite the same
Who will we accuse now
Who caused the great stain*
(Bill did!*)
Ironman always has: NOTHING.
Except using the infrastructure that he didn't build.
Retailers to 45's daughter: YOU"RE FIRED!
FREE,FREE,FREE MARKETS!
Consumers are free to spend their money where & on what they choose.
INDIVIDUAL! FINANCIAL! FREEDOM!
Republicans, How you like your ideology,NOW?
Mom & pop Republicans Redneck White Trash businesses.
"Momma! I don't know why no one comes into our store."
Ironman always has: NOTHING.
Except using the infrastructure that he didn't build.
I guess the government built your business that was successful for 40 years?
Except using the infrastructure that he didn't build.
In fairness, improving infrastructure (outside of the wall) would be a nice thing compared to bombing and selling double the weapons to Saudi that bush did, even if it increases the deficit.
The jobs created will result in more money spent on goods and services. Whether that would effectively offset deficit is debatable but certainly, there are lot of places in US where infrastructure is substandard
Any role model for young american women should be, if not obese, at least overweight (curvy).
Ivanaka should be a role Model to young women, the face of empowerment. Liberals hate success
So success if finding a billionaire who inherited his fortune and then sucking his cock? Well, I wish you the best of success.
Finding a billionaire who inherited his fortune and then sucking his cock? Well, I wish you the best of success.
For a moral relativist, who claims to abhor religion and it's somewhat prudish sexual rules, you sure do love to slut shame some women!
For a moral relativist, who claims to abhor religion and it's somewhat prudish sexual rules, you sure do love to slut shame some women!
What exactly is shameful about sucking a billionaire's cock for his money? You're slut shaming her by making the assumption that exchanging sex for wealth makes a woman a slut. Every woman does this. In fact, that's the basis of marriage throughout history.
My point was that it's not a plausible career choice. There simply aren't enough billionaire cocks to suck. Therefore, Ivanaka isn't a realistic role model.
To follow her path to success you must
1. Be born with the right genetic code to be far better looking than most women.
2. Get lucky that you're in the right place at the right time to meet a billionaire.
3. Get that billionaire to dump his current wife and leave his children.
4. Make sure some other woman doesn't do the same to you.
Steps 1 and 2 require massive luck, not skill, and the first is determined at conception.
Also, how am I a moral relativist? Situation does affect which decisions are good and which are bad, but I have no problem with there being universal laws that are parameterized. I'm a software developer. This is what I do for a living?
For example, is it immoral to submerge a baby in a river? What if the baby is on fire next to a river, and submerging him is the only way to save his life? There's your relativism, but it's an environmental condition, not a change in the rule. The rule is you should help the baby. How that rule plays out is subject to environmental considerations, but the correct rules are universal.
In fact, it's mechanically trivial to convert any relativistic morality into a universal morality simply by using IF and CASE statements.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4208946/PIERS-Ivanka-role-model-Hillary-losers-bitter.html