« prev   random   next »

1
0

Newsweek Tries to Save Globalization and My Response

By Gary Anderson follow Gary Anderson   2016 Dec 3, 1:20pm 1,410 views   5 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


http://www.examplesofglobalization.com/2016/12/my-response-to-very-lame-article-on.html Globalization has us fighting limited wars. Globalization has us fighting never ending limited wars. And globalization has us subject to liar loans and a financial system where no banker goes to jail for screwing the common man. If it was just about free trade I am all for it. But unfortunately, it isn't just about free trade. It is about keeping America weak so that the globalists have nothing to fear from it.

Globalization in its current form is the vision of people like Cecil Rhodes and David Ben-Gurion. It is about New World Order control, about financial control of the nations by the Square Mile. Look up the Square Mile, home of Gog and Magog, the Roman statues that guard it. Globalization is about a financial new Roman Empire. Trump is likely only a partial answer, as he picked a foreclosure banker for secretary of treasury, violating those who trusted him to keep the bankers in check.

#politics #economics #investing #totalitarianism

1   AllTruth   ignore (1)   2016 Dec 3, 3:24pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

As a really wise person opined, once a term like trade is qualified with a modifier, such as "free," one can be almost positive that it's certainly NOT free, and is most likely malignant, with incredibly harmful repercussions for most.

"Free" trade is great for multinational corporations, who pay little to no effective taxes no matter how much their revenues, and who literally write the laws that govern the world (since they one the "representatives" and "regulators" in governments, but HORRID for 96%+ of the individuals who work for a living (labor), who are squeezed further and further with each passing year, and who pay 90% of the taxes, and have no "representatives" that they own.

2   Gary Anderson   ignore (0)   2016 Dec 3, 5:13pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

It is like Mers and registration of real estate in each individual county. The local law means nothing. I agree on this one issue with you, Alltruth. I am for really free trade, but the abuses of globalization are many, including distorting free trade to mean hot money, or other evils that hurt local economies.

3   Shaman   ignore (2)   2016 Dec 3, 5:24pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Free trade is impossible given vastly different governance between member nations. There is always someone who pays for such "free trade" and it's always the people who pay while the oligarchs take advantage of different rules to increase their wealth and power over the people they are already screwing.

4   Gary Anderson   ignore (0)   2016 Dec 3, 10:57pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Quigley says

Free trade is impossible given vastly different governance between member nations. There is always someone who pays for such "free trade" and it's always the people who pay while the oligarchs take advantage of different rules to increase their wealth and power over the people they are already screwing.

But to completely stop world trade would be a very bad idea.

5   Strategist   ignore (2)   2016 Dec 4, 7:34am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Gary Anderson says

But to completely stop world trade would be a very bad idea.

Stop making sense Gary, you are confusing everyone.


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions