Comments 1 - 20 of 20 Search these comments
DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says
Did someone suggest Sanders and IHLary have a hard on contest?
Bernie could take a whole bottle of viagra and a mescaline suppository, and he couldn't match the battering ram emerging from an IHL's fetid pelt, much less the Godmother of IHLs, IHLlary!
Watched democratic debate.
Yea sure right. No one actually believes that you would have watched. it. Did you watch it in spanish hanging with the bro's in east la?
Legalize drugs
This I agree-the rest meh!
Did you say you can't resist METH???
Anyone that watches D/R debates needs to get a life. I think there after Christmas sales with tremendous. discounts. Take a chance,buy a life & get a new experience.
Yep this country is fucked, same old crap, just louder this year. Just move to North Korea, might not be very different and at least they've done this commie thing longer.
Total rubbish. Mark my words: The Republicans are now starting their bi-annual campaign of "it does not matter whether you vote, because both parties are the same, but if you do vote, you must vote Republican, because the Democrats are bad".
Hell no. If you believe that, Wall St has some Credit Default Swaps to sell you. Hell no. It matters a great deal who you vote for. Hell no. Trying to conflate or equate Bernie Sanders with Donald Trump or Marco Rubio is a gigantic propaganda lie designed to get a few percent of Democratic voters to become disillusioned and stay home on primary day or on election day. The result will be that the country yet again will be run by Wall St.
- Black lives matter
Are you saying that they don't? That's the problem.
- Legalize drugs
Why should the government be allowed to control what an individual puts inside his or her body?
- Ban guns
There is no national legislation proposed to ban guns. So saying that there is such legislation is just plain stupid and disingenuous.
It's also hypocritical for you to object to a ban on guns when you are clearly for a ban on drugs. Why should guns, devices whose sole purpose is to kill people, be allowed if drugs are not. No one dies of a pot overdose. People who die from hard drug overdoses know the risks and only kill themselves. In contrast people who possess guns kill other people.
It would be fine if you were for both guns and drugs, or only drugs being legal, but to be for a ban on drugs and not for a ban on guns which are far more dangerous is entirely hypocritical. No matter how many drug users are around me, I can choose not to participate in drug usage. I cannot choose not to get shot by some asshole go just wants to kill random people.
- Free stuff for everyone, just vote for me first.
The only people getting free stuff are the rich and large corporations. Small businesses and individuals don't get shit. Do you have any idea how many billions of dollars each year of our taxes go to corporations in the form of subsidies and tax breaks, all due to Republicans?
- Raise taxes
If by raising taxes you mean closing loopholes for the rich that the rest of us can't use, I'm all for it.
- Break up the banks.
The biggest banks should be broken up. There is no free market if a few players dominate the market by sheer size and force their will into law on onto the market.
The big banks caused the Second Great Depression, and we're still recovering from that.
- Soak the rich
Well, we can always go back to the 1950s when times were better because the marginal income tax rate was 91%. If the rich are getting soaked today, then soak my ass like a crazy motherfucker.
- Hillarys speaking fees are too damn high, only Goldman Sachs can afford.
So you don't believe in the free market then? Because this is exactly what the free market is. It's Hilary charging whatever the highest traffic will bear for her time. If you actually believed in the free market, you would believe that Hilary is worth exactly what she can charge by definition. Now I don't think Hilary is worth that much, but I don't believe that the free market works 100% of the time in 100% of situations. In fact, I'd put the free market as working at best only 80% of the time in 50% of economic fields and 0% of the time in the other 50%, but that's just me.
For you to bitch about Hilary's speaking fees while espousing the free market is utterly hypocritical.
Of course, it is also hypocritical of you to support Trump after bitching about Bill Clinton getting a blow job from Monica Lewinsky. Trump cheated on all three of his wives! In contrast to that, Bill Clinton is the ideal husband.
- Black lives matter
Are you saying that they don't? That's the problem.
I just don't seem to see the stupid politically imposed divide between black and non black. Because all it is, is stupid liberal left-wing bullshit that has gone on for too long, kind of like feministic crap. How about "all lives matter", but that won't get the stupid vote like yours , who are interested in politics of division.
All black people are not same, all white people not same, but politicians from the left conveniently threw everyone into groups and started choosing who is the special victim of the day should be. It's just you liberals are clueless, sheep, herd, carpet for your Democratic party owners, you get the picture... nah you probably don't, you never did before.
I just don't seem to see the stupid politically imposed divide between black and non black.
This is a bullshit argument. There is an epidemic of innocent black men, women, and children being killed by cops that has no analog in whites. It's statistically damn significant.
Proportionately, far more innocent blacks are killed than whites. To claim race has nothing to do with this disproportion is a bold-face lie.
How about "all lives matter", but that won't get the stupid vote like yours , who are interested in politics of division.
Once again, you are a lying sack of shit. The movement "black lives matter" does not imply in any way, shape, or form that white lives don't also matter. It's called "black lives matter" because police clearly do not think they do as shown by the disproportionate killing of unarmed black people including sleeping 9-year-old girls and the lack of prosecution for these crimes. If a cop killed a sleeping blonde-hair, blue-eye 9-year-old girl, he would be brought to trial period. The same did not happen when a black 9-year-old sleeping girl was shot point-blank in the head by a cop.
As for politics of division, it's racist and homophobic assholes like you who engage in that. As a liberal, I understand that the violation of anyone's rights is a violation of everyone's right. That's unity, you sniveling bitch. Those who believe we are all Americans with the same rights support blackLivesMatter because we support the protection of all Americans and the accountability for all criminals including those with badges. By shitting on the wholesale slaughter of unarmed and often innocent people, you are behaving completely Unamerican.
All black people are not same, all white people not same, but politicians from the left conveniently threw everyone into groups and started choosing who is the special victim of the day should be. It's just you liberals are clueless, sheep, herd, carpet for your Democratic party owners, you get the picture... nah you probably don't, you never did before.
More bullshit. No one, except you racists, have ever argued that people of the same race or culture are all the same. And this has nothing to do with blackLivesMatter. The math proves systemic racism, plain and simple. Math does not lie, and it can be used to prove things beyond any doubt reasonable or otherwise. I'll believe the math before I believe a racist like you any day.
To summarize, your objection to #blackLivesMatter is purely racist. You have no legitimate objection and all your arguments are straw men that bear no resemblance to reality. You deliberately misrepresent your opposition to cover your own bigoted views, and there is nothing patriotic about your attacks on American citizens. An no matter what the evidence to the contrary, you will continue to espouse your racist and ignorant views. That makes you part of the problem, not the solution.
The solution, of course, is the following.
1. All cops must wear body cameras whenever they are on duty, in uniform, or in possession of a gun.
2. The body cameras are constantly recording. Recordings are kept for at least one year, and at least ten if flagged.
3. The prison population and the general public can flag recordings. Flag events are recorded to determine reliable and unreliable flaggers to set priority of reviews of videos.
4. Any evidence of a crime committed by a cop, as determined by the ACLU and other volunteer lawyers and independent review committee, always goes to trial.
5. The trial is conducted in a civilian court system separate from the state and federal court systems to avoid conflicts of interest. The state court system has demonstrated an unwillingness to prosecute police crimes unless they are horrific and cause considerable uproar in the white community. Even riots in black communities aren't considered enough public outcry.
republicans must run the academy awards, i guess. what a fucking joke. democrats who require equal outcome are the real closed minds.
Get off the moon Dan.
Translation: Dan called me on my bullshit and I have no response.
DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says
Reagan was a communist twink. He raised taxes, you know.
He is only America's greatest president because Nancy blew Frank Sinatra.
Additionally he gave weapons to terrorists and to Saddam. How was he not hung for treason?
- Black lives matter
- Legalize drugs
- Ban guns
- Free stuff for everyone, just vote for me first.
- Raise taxes
- Break up the banks.
- Soak the rich
- Hillarys speaking fees are too damn high, only Goldman Sachs can afford.
Yep this country is fucked, same old crap, just louder this year. Just move to North Korea, might not be very different and at least they've done this commie thing longer.
#politics