« prev   random   next »

3
0

Wow, there is actually a coherent site explaining anti-male sexism

By someone else follow someone else   2016 Jan 17, 9:02am 1,320 views   4 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


http://ncfm.org/

We have heard in some detail from the women’s movement how such sex-stereotyping has limited the potential of women. More recently, men have become increasingly aware that they too are assigned limiting roles which they are expected to fulfill regardless of their individual abilities, interests, physical/emotional constitutions or needs. Men have few or no effective choices in many critical areas of life. They face injustices under the law. And typically they have been handicapped by socially defined “shoulds” in expressing themselves in other than stereotypical ways.

i don't entirely agree with this. men express themselves in stereotypical ways not just for cultural reasons, but because those ways were genetically successful in bringing them down to the present day. i don't see it as a handicap, nor do i think men should try to change to accommodate PC thinking.

to be a little more blunt, dominant men win, weak men lose. some degree over over-confidence and aggression is actually a good thing. too much and you inspire other men to unite against you, too little and you lose out on respect, career opportunities, and yes, women.

1   resistance   ignore (0)   2016 Jan 17, 9:29am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1350829/Sky-sexism-row-Why-right-women-sexist-MEN.html

For make no mistake: sexism is alive and well in this country and applauded in all quarters — as long as it is practised by women. And they are allowed to say the most terrible, terrible things.

Only last week, for example, Jo Brand, the newly crowned Best Female TV Comic at the British Comedy Awards, was on Have I Got News For You and replied to the question ‘What’s your favourite kind of man, Jo?’ by saying: ‘A dead one.’ Oh, how the audience fell about. And the other contestants, all male, chortled away too.

2   Ceffer   ignore (4)   2016 Jan 17, 10:06am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Men are made to compete and kill until a true alpha leader emerges from the bloodshed to lead the survivors; then, to engage in feuds and sorties against adjacent tribes in an effort to kill all their men, murder and cannibalize their children, and then rape and re-impregnate the women with their own sperm depending on their own tribal hierarchy.

Why do women hold this against us? Why do they only like it when men drag carcasses and resources to their door like cats with mice and birds?

Why do they hate nature?

3   someone else   ignore (0)   2016 Jan 17, 10:22am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

to some degree that's all true. but the modern degree is rather moderate and productive (except for isis, which is exactly like you describe).

the world does benefit from male-male competition, as long as men are producing economic value and improving themselves to compete.

4   NoCoupForYou   ignore (2)   2016 Jan 17, 10:31am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

People misuse Alpha. The leader of a human band isn't the bulkiest, most Arnold looking dude. It's the best survivor, the most charismatic, and the most experienced, in a traditional band.

5   Ceffer   ignore (4)   2016 Jan 17, 10:33am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

May the best psychopath win!


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions