patrick.net

Why can't people stick to whining about the real victims of persecution in this country: Christians who refuse to do their jobs.

More liberal divisiveness:

WASHINGTON — Speaker John A. Boehner has been luminous in the anti-abortion movement since he was a little-known Ohio state lawmaker, and is widely viewed as the most passionate opponent of abortion to ever wield the speaker’s gavel.

Yet abortion politics are suddenly posing the greatest threat to his speakership since he ascended to that position four years ago.

Conservatives on his right flank are questioning Mr. Boehner’s resolve to stand up to President Obama over federal funding for Planned Parenthood, and their foment is so great they are mulling a challenge to the speaker’s control of the House.

They want Mr. Boehner to agree to a strategy of removing all federal money for Planned Parenthood in a short-term spending bill to keep the government operating, an approach that would almost certainly fail in the Senate. Without a basic bill to keep the government running for the rest of the year, the lights would go out for a second time since Republicans took control of the House in 2011.

Satan must have convinced women to have abortions because he is afraid of the second coming of nazarene. Not only does he control their thoughts but he controls the neurotransmitters that give rise to the thoughts.

FortWayne says

America and politics of division.

Says Mr. Divisive. Funny how you don't complain about real divisiveness like calling blacks "thugs", using liberal as a dirty word, the War on Christmas bullshit, your b.s. posts on Christians being persecuted in the U.S., bigoted and ridiculous posts about gays, and statements from Romney like
https://www.youtube.com/embed/M2gvY2wqI7M

The three phrases you bitch and moan about are responses to real and very serious problems.

The “war on women.”

Conservatives, in their quest to prevent even first-term abortions, have literally called for laws required women to be literally raped before getting an abortion. And yes, I'm using the term literally correct, as in "actually". This is far more a war than the bullshit "war on Christmas". You just don't like the term because it makes clear how much the Republican platform harms women.

“Black lives matter.”

It's "black lives matter", not "only black lives matter". This phrase does not imply that other people's lives don't matter, and trying to make that so is disingenuous bullshit. There is an epidemic of cops committing brutal crimes against the people of our countries, and yes, this violence is overwhelmingly directed at black Americans. And when a black life is taken by a criminal cop, the court system considers that black life to be worthless, and thus "no harm, no foul" for the cop. That's the meaning behind "black lives matter", and to say the court system or police departments treat black lives as if they do matter is utter bullshit.

“The 99 percent” versus “the 1 percent.”

The rich have been waging class warfare on the poor and the middle class for over a century, hell over two centuries. The rich do not get rich by producing wealth (with damn few exceptions), but rather by stealing wealth from the rest of us. Our entire economic and political system is set up for the primary purpose of stealing wealth from the poor and middle class so that a bunch of prissy, lazy asswipes can live opulent lifestyles without ever having to do an honest day's work in their life. People should be pissed off at this. It is the most important issue in our society.

FortWayne says

The “war on women.”

“Black lives matter.”

“The 99 percent” versus “the 1 percent.”

They'll all be gone by November 8th 2016, when the state department stops funding them.

FortWayne says

The “war on women.”

“Black lives matter.”

“The 99 percent” versus “the 1 percent.”

You left out "you didn't build that".

P N Dr Lo R says

You left out "you didn't build that".

Amazing. There are people who resent simple statements of fact, even as they call everyone else whiners.

Walmart didn't pay to build the interstate highways. Apple and Microsoft and Google didn't build the Internet: taxpayers built that.

anonymous says

The "state department" ?

Yes the State Department
http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/16/state-department-is-mum-on-whether-hillary-signed-important-classified-information-nondisclosure-agreement/

Build a wall and deport 'em all is exactly the type of inclusiveness we need.

Rew says

Build a wall and deport 'em all is exactly the type of inclusiveness we need

If you have a nice house and some person from the ghetto walks in and stays-will you ask him to leave ? You may invite people into your house and ask them to leave when you tire of them-but how many "illegals" will you take in.

A country is not that different-there is only so much it can take in, before it starts going downhill.

Dan8267 says

using liberal as a dirty word

I didn't make that word dirty. It's the extereme liberals like you Dan who ruined it. Sorry Dan, but that's how it is. Many folks associate word liberal with certain kind of people who no one likes. If you didn't hate America so much, and didn't hate "normal" people, while constantly supporting all kinds of stupid shit like homosexuality, abortions, and retardations the word wouldn't be associated that way and wouldn't be a dirty word.

FortWayne says

I didn't make that word dirty. It's the extereme liberals like you Dan who ruined it.

"All men are created equal" would seem extreme to a bigot like you.

The word "extreme" has become a bullshit dehumanizing label in politics, both on the right and the left. Idiots think that by labeling a person or group as extreme, they don't have to justify their opposition to the group, the person, or the ideas advocated by the labeled ones. Well, I'm calling bullshit on Wayne and everyone else who uses this word.

Any person with a real argument against an idea should be able to present a sound, rational counterargument rather than using the word "extreme" as a substitute for actual, honest debate. The very use of the word has become a red flag indicating that a person cannot justify his position or his opposition to his opponents. If the abolition movement were occurring today, the pro-slavery groups would be calling abolitionists "extremists".

FortWayne says

If you didn't hate America so much, and didn't hate "normal" people,

Gay people and blacks are normal people and Americans. It is clearly you who hates normal people and Americans.

Dan you've been presented plenty, you don't give a shit, and it won't change your mind. So why would I waste my time, I don't really give a fuck either. To me the extreme was you telling us all that you hate America, that's an extreme to me.

By the way, did anyone else notice the hypocrisy of Wayne in calling people who believe in gay and civil rights extremists in the same paragraph as he dehumanizes those people?

FortWayne says

Dan you've been presented plenty,

I've been presented with plenty of instances of your bigotry and irrationality. You have never presented any actual evidence or logically consistent reasoning to support your bigotry.

For example, you argue that homosexuality is evil because it's unnatural. When presented with scientific papers, videos, and millions of accounts of homosexuality existing throughout nature, you don't even acknowledge that you are wrong and homosexuality is natural. You then argue that if gay marriage becomes the law of the land, our entire society will collapse because straight marriage is the very foundation of civilization. Well, gay marriage is now the law of the land and society has not faltered in the slightest bit. Care to admit you were dead wrong about that?

Dan8267 says

For example, you argue that homosexuality is evil because it's unnatural. When presented with scientific papers, videos, and millions of accounts of homosexuality existing throughout nature, you don't even acknowledge that you are wrong and homosexuality is natural. You then argue that if gay marriage becomes the law of the land, our entire society will collapse because straight marriage is the very foundation of civilization. Well, gay marriage is now the law of the land and society has not faltered in the slightest bit. Care to admit you were dead wrong about that?

I can't admit being wrong there Dan, yet. Wait and see another two years, that's all I need to see. If homosexuality stays the same way, where it's not promoted onto general population through liberal media, than I'll admit being wrong. But it it does come true, what I fear, than I doubt anyone will give a damn who was right because we will be falling apart morally in this society.

Besides Dan you ignored plenty of scientific proof that children do what they see and what they are exposed to, which means homosexuality can be taught.

FortWayne says

I can't admit being wrong there Dan, yet. Wait and see another two years, that's all I need to see.

So if in two years the IRS is still collecting taxes and the apes aren't lording over human slave camps, you'll admit your wrong? I doubt it.

FortWayne says

But it it does come true, what I fear, than I doubt anyone will give a damn who was right because we will be falling apart morally in this society.

Oh, so now it's not society will collapse but something vague like "we will be falling apart morally". What bullshit. Do you think that torturing people and raping them in Guantanamo Bay was a moral success? Wasn't our country morally bankrupt during the first century of it existence when it practiced widespread slavery? Wasn't segregation highly immoral? Isn't the war on drugs a moral outrage? What about killing over a million men, women, and children, innocent civilians, in Bush's false flag war in Iraq immoral? Last time I checked, blowing up a child into tiny pieces with a drone wasn't moral righteousness.

And you say monogamous same sex marriages is going to destroy the morality of this country. What fucking bullshit. There is nothing moral about the perverted things you want.

Morally abhorrent according to Wayne

Morally OK according to Wayne

Dan I really don't care to debate or argue when you go off on tangents talking about apes and bringing up your hatred toward America for something that happened over a 100 years ago. I really don't.

FortWayne says

your hatred toward America

Ah yes, the false ad hominem attack is the last ditch response when you cannot address the hypocrisy of your position. If anyone here has hatred of Americans and today's American culture, it's you.

So, are willing to concede that the moral standing of America between 1775 and 1865 was far below that of today because of slavery?

Are you wiling to concede that the the moral standing of America between 1865 and 1964 was far below that of today because of segregation?

Exactly when did the period of high moral standards in America begin in your petty little worldview? When was America the moral bastion you like to make it out?

I suspect that you consider the slavery era of America to be morally better than today, but you don't have the balls to admit it.

The fact is that the Millennials are the most moral generation America has yet scene precisely because they reject the ideas you advocate.

FortWayne says

bringing up your hatred toward America for something that happened over a 100 years ago

What? Has Dan been waving the Confederate flag?

Here's Trump creating an issue out of a problem which doesn't exist in order to "unite" people:

Billionaire businessman Donald Trump on Wednesday doubled down on his controversial stance that vaccinations are linked to what he described as an autism “epidemic.”

“I’ve seen it,” he said at the second main-stage GOP debate on CNN Wednesday night.

“You take this little beautiful baby, and you pump — it looks just like it’s meant for a horse," he said of vaccines.

"We’ve had so many instances ... a child went to have the vaccine, got very, very sick, and now is autistic."
The GOP front-runner said he still supported certain vaccines, but in smaller doses over a longer period of time. Under current procedures, he said it's dangerous for the public.

It has been debunked & debunked & debunked. Even Ben Carson knows there's nothing to this. But a man who has lost money running a casino knows better than the professionals.

Boo! Booga booga! Run and hide! Fear! Hate!

HydroCabron says

What? Has Dan been waving the Confederate flag?

No, he just posted that he hates America and everyone born in it past and present.

FortWayne says

Wait and see another two years, that's all I need to see. If homosexuality stays the same way, where it's not promoted onto general population through liberal media, than I'll admit being wrong

2 years? Seriously, how do you function with judgment like this?

Speaking of wrong, you ready to call no joy and choke this one down, or do you want to wait til the end of the year?
/housing/2015+Real+Estate+Prediction

Beyond that, how can your judgment about what the near term future be like so horrendously flawed? Is it the media you consume? Is it your fear and anxiety about what the tee vee is telling you that so badly clouds your judgment? Oh and its not just housing and gays, its

Ebola
/misc/Ebola+patient+died

and housing (at the bottom of the market and best moment in the last decade to buy)
/housing/How+to+bet+against+a+housing+market%3F

and facebook (people shorting FB at the absolute bottom will make out like a highway robbery)
/?p=1215483&page=1#comments

Its everything! At one point, you had a tagline "Freedom 1776 - 2012". Whatever the 2012 "OMG WE ARE FINISHED" calamity du jour was, it resolved itself and your tagline disappeared. Do you even how remember what the issue was had you so wrapped up in hysterics back then? My guess is you don't. Is there ever a day that goes by that you don't think everything under the sun goes to shit? When you wake up day after day after day, and see basically business as usual, do you ever say to yourself? Gee, perhaps my judgment about how terrible things are, and the speed and magnitude of when things go to shit isn't that good?

Dan8267 says

So, are willing to concede that the moral standing of America between 1775 and 1865 was far below that of today because of slavery?

Are you wiling to concede that the the moral standing of America between 1865 and 1964 was far below that of today because of segregation?

Yes to both. That would be a reason to love America today, because we are now a different country. But you hate her, because of the past. A past that was no different than any other region on the planet.

Dan8267 says

Exactly when did the period of high moral standards in America begin in your petty little worldview? When was America the moral bastion you like to make it out?

Our moral standards are constantly evolving. All answers are therefore opinions only.

Ironman says

Are you going to invite all of us to your wedding?

You wouldn't have the balls to show up, as you've demonstrated.

Dan8267 says

So, are willing to concede that the moral standing of America between 1775 and 1865 was far below that of today because of slavery?

No, because back than slavery was considered normal. Slavery today would be immoral. You can't judge an 1865 man by the views of a 2012 man, two different mindsets. Just like you don't judge a man at adult age for shitting his diaper when he was 1 year old. This is supposed to be common sense Dan.

FortWayne says

HydroCabron says

What? Has Dan been waving the Confederate flag?

No, he just posted that he hates America and everyone born in it past and present.

Reference please. Oh wait, you can't because you're a lying sack of shit.

anonymous says

"Eric brings many years of proven experience and exceptional leadership to this new role," the President said in a statement. "I am grateful for his commitment to our men and women in uniform, and I am confident he will help lead America's Soldiers with distinction."

This just proves that Obama doesn't care about our nation. We are supposed to pick talent, not just choose someone because they are straight or gay. When politicians mix army with politics, things turn out bad. I only hope that "Eric/Erica" actually is good at what they do, and weren't just picked because Obama is trying to appease gay minority groups right before elections.

Strategist says

But you hate her, because of the past.

1. It's impossible to love or hate a country. Using those words to refer to a country simply cheapens the meanings of those words.

2. Drone strikes, militant police forces, and the war on drugs are present-day problems.

3. Acknowledging the crimes of people in government is not hating a country. A country is not its government, nor the criminals who hold a tiny but powerful fraction of government positions. The fact that you cannot grasp this simple concept is a failure of your intellect, not my character.

4. Countries don't have genders, personalities, or thoughts. They are imaginary borders drawn on a map.

FortWayne says

Dan8267 says

So, are willing to concede that the moral standing of America between 1775 and 1865 was far below that of today because of slavery?

No, because back than slavery was considered normal.

So if raping babies were the norm, you'd consider that moral. No wonder you are so fucked up.

Tell me, does your fictitious god also agree with that?

Oh, and if gay man ass sex were to become more common than penis-vagina sex, then gay man ass sex would be moral and man-woman sex would be an abomination, right? Do you actually think before you post something? The contradictions in your posts are beyond apparent.

FortWayne says

America and politics of division.

FortWayne says

This just proves that Obama doesn't care about our nation.

Jesus Fucking Christ, the hypocrisy.

It's all right Dan. One day, hopefully, you'll grow up and understand us adults.

FortWayne says

It's all right Dan. One day, hopefully, you'll grow up and understand us adults.

Speaking of which, a big part of being an adult is accountability
/housing/2015+Real+Estate+Prediction
The end of the year is still not here. Do you want to double down on this call or do you want to start munching down on this shit sandwich now?

Dan8267 says

1. It's impossible to love or hate a country. Using those words to refer to a country simply cheapens the meanings of those words.

WTF. I love America. I also love democracy, freedom, and human rights. I love all countries that practice these values.
I hate Saudi Arabia. Because they practice nothing I love.
How can you say it's impossible to love or hate a country?

Dan8267 says

2. Drone strikes, militant police forces, and the war on drugs are present-day problems.

Solutions Dan, they are solutions, not problems.
Terrorists and criminals are the problem.
Did you swallow your brain? It's in your rectum right now.

FortWayne says

It's all right Dan. One day, hopefully, you'll grow up and understand us adults.

Wow, you really have no response to all of your hypocrisy that I pointed out above.

Strategist says

WTF. I love America. I also love democracy, freedom, and human rights. I love all countries that practice these values.

I hate Saudi Arabia. Because they practice nothing I love.

How can you say it's impossible to love or hate a country?

You are misusing the terms.

1. America is a republic, not a democracy.
2. You don't love America or even like it much. You simply are an arrogant tribalist and when you are talking up America, you are really just saying you are great and everyone else is inferior.
3. You clearly do not love Americans. You didn't give a shit about Trayvon Martin. He was an American. You don't give a damn about any Muslim Americans. You hate liberal Americans. So it's meaningless to say that you even support the country that is America.
4. Countries don't preach values, people do.
5. Preaching a value isn't the same as upholding it.
6. Throughout American history, including today, the values of democracy, freedom, and human rights take a back seat to money and power.
7. A person who actually cares about the well-being of his countrymen would seek to change #6 rather than white wash it.
8. An wise person realizes that it's the way societies operate that matter, not the fact that you were born in a country. If you were born in Afghanistan, you'd be saying "death to America" because Afghanistan would be your tribe.

FortWayne says

Dan8267 says

So, are willing to concede that the moral standing of America between 1775 and 1865 was far below that of today because of slavery?

No, because back than slavery was considered normal. Slavery today would be immoral. You can't judge an 1865 man by the views of a 2012 man, two different mindsets. Just like you don't judge a man at adult age for shitting his diaper when he was 1 year old. This is supposed to be common sense Dan.

The moral code of the Bible never changes.
The Bible considers slavery as moral, while you consider slavery as immoral, ironically a secular value.

Strategist says

Dan8267 says

2. Drone strikes, militant police forces, and the war on drugs are present-day problems.

Solutions Dan, they are solutions, not problems.

This is not a solution.

NPR Report

NPR's Kelly McEvers has been to parts of Yemen, where these drones have struck. She found that while they do hit their targets, they often kill more civilians than officials claim, and relatives of the victims sometimes join al-Qaida in revenge.

You are the moral equivalent of pond scum.

Strategist says

The moral code of the Bible never changes.

The Bible considers slavery as moral, while you consider slavery as immoral, ironically a secular value.

I would have to disagree with that Strategist. Bible documented slavery and worked with society that considered slavery normal. Today bible works for the society there is now. Bible doesn't change society, it helps improve the one we live in. Think about it, bible teaches gods love. If you love your neighbor, would you mistreat him or put him into slavery?

There is a lot more to the bible than randomly taken out verses. Without context of time and understanding that men of it's time had when it was published, we can't judge it by our values today.