by Patrick ➕follow (55) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 16 of 16 Search these comments
Act 1, Aug. 26, 2021 (and before): The CDC defines a vaccine as “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.” ...
Act 2, August 28, 2021: I tweet that we should not think of the mRNA vaccines as vaccines because they do not stop infection. Twitter rules my tweet misleading and suspends me for “violations of our COVID-19 misinformation rules.” This defamatory act prevents me from using my account anywhere in the world. ...
Act 3, Sep. 1, 2021: The CDC changes its definition of “vaccine,” removing the standard that vaccines produce immunity. Now they just need to “stimulate the body’s immune response.”
Discovery’s gonna be awesome!
These are not vaccines
This is not a vaccine and has not been proven to be one, and no amount of wishing it was and hoping it was, can make it a vaccine. Moreover, these injections were sub-optimally studied and particularly as to the safety portion of the studies. We do not have proper duration data to show the safety; we have not ‘excluded harms’ with these injection studies; we have no safety profiles; our children must never be injected with these as we do not know what will happen medium and long-term and these injections are not needed given our children’s near statistical zero risk of infection, of transmitting the virus, and severe outcome if infected. You must understand, mRNA technology has never been successfully utilized to show its capacity to reduce the incidence of infectious diseases in human beings, EVER! We have no history of this, and we do not know what takes place after the lipid nano-particles (LNP) and messenger RNA (mRNA) enters your cells/body. We do not know if the mRNA is ‘turned off’ and spike protein is no longer produced etc. We do not know where the spike protein goes after being produced and for how long.
The appropriate reproductive toxicity studies, the teratogenicity studies, the pharmacodynamic studies, and the pharmacokinetic studies etc. were not done. The spike protein on the viral ball is the portion of the virus that causes the devastating trauma and illness from severe COVID-19. This spike protein is what kills you and devastates your vasculature, ravaging the endothelial layer of the vasculature. End-stage severe COVID-19 illness is a blood clotting vascular illness. You do not die when your lungs fail in end-stage COVID-19 because there is virus in the lungs. No, you die because of the millions of micro-thrombi (blood clots). The spike protein that our cells produce post injection (though not exactly alike the authentic spike protein on the viral ball), is pathogenic and toxic. It is deadly.
Conclusion
Then why would we inject something that causes severe illness (damages our vasculature) if infected, now as part of an effort to inoculate/inject to prevent the severe illness? This makes absolutely no sense. Why did the developers use the spike as the target for the immune response when it confers a very narrow ‘spike-specific’ immunity with a very immature immunity library? I close by asserting that a vaccine was never needed for this emergency and what was produced has now shown itself to be failing with double-injected persons becoming infected with the Delta variant, with severe adverse effects and even death. We have to put the brakes on this vaccine roll-out and stop. This injection program must be stopped so that we can understand why these harms and deaths have accrued and must only be targeted to the highest-risk persons where the risk-benefit calculation skews the decision toward the injection; this injection is completely contra-indicated for children and essentially for all persons under 70 years of age who are not at risk. At the least, the injection developers, the CDC, and FDA must ensure the immediate implementation of data safety monitoring, ethical review boards, and critical event review boards etc. Ideally, the injection program must be stopped entirely given what we are seeing. These injections must not be given to pregnant women or women of child-bearing age, children, teenagers, or COVID-recovered persons or suspected COVID-recovered persons. Under no condition, as there is tremendous danger from these injections.
Paul E. Alexander, PhD
Howard Tenenbaum DDS, Dip. Perio., PhD, FRCD(C)
We know they are lying to us. We just don't know how much and about what.
If You Are Not Immunized From A Virus, You Were Never Vaccinated Period
January 20 2022 at 05:30 PM
This is what the CDC tried to hide by removing the definition of vaccine while replacing it with their rubbish on September 10th 2021. Of course major dictionaries are willing to lose their credibility by following suit with the shady globalist low life scum bag narrative by replacing definitions with complete globalist rubbish. Of course with Youtube, Twitter and Facebook being threatened with endless lawsuits to comply with the globalist narratives, what makes you even skeptical that smaller businesses would do the same?!
Calling something that isn't a vaccine, a vaccine because they remove the definition of vaccine and replace it with rubbish while politicians wheel and deal behind closed doors so that big pharma isn't held accountable for the damage they cause to human citizens of countries suffering covid, blood clots, heart problems, neural paralysis etc. from the jabs they administer is supporting a giant hate crime against humanity.
You are all being thrown under the bus with a slew of lies under guise of pandemic along with calling injections that are not vaccines a vaccine to try and dominate the masses with fake shame for not complying with such rubbish only so greedy, selfish and ignorant low life scum bags can get rich off of big pharma while they make the masses unhealthy and suffer their government putting your children further in debt over their sick and filthy jabs disguised as vaccines.
The “vaccines” using mRNA (Moderna, Pfizer) are really in the category of “gene therapy” I believe.
That and the CDC stopped tracking flu cases.
The CDC on their website back in the fall of 2020 said this:
Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, this system will suspend data collection for the 2020-21 influenza season. Data from previous seasons are available on FluView Interactive.
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/overview.htm?source=patrick.net
That paragraph has now changed to say this:
The State and Territorial Epidemiologists Report, a weekly estimate of the geographic spread of influenza activity in each jurisdiction, was suspended for the 2020-21 influenza season due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic which impacted the data systems used to generate the estimates.
After discussions with public health partners during the summer of 2021, the decision was made to permanently retire this surveillance component due in part to the fact that the systems used to determine the level of spread remain significantly altered. Additionally, it was determined that a measure of geographic spread was not necessary any more given the advances of other influenza surveillance system components in recent years. Data from previous seasons will remain available on FluView Interactive.
What is the proper term for something that doesnt provide full immunity, but does provide some protection? Inoculation?
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,190,214 comments by 13,851 users - richwicks online now