4
0

Medical And Scientific Journals Trying To Claw Back Credibility And Rise Above Toilet Paper Status?


 invite response                
2022 Oct 13, 10:03am   1,316 views  12 comments

by Ceffer   ➕follow (5)   💰tip   ignore  

From our buddy Benjamin Fulford: https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=209317

"Two of the top five medical journals in the world Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine have retracted COVID-related articles.

Now Hindawi, one of the world’s largest open-access journal publishers is retracting 511 papers that appeared in 16 different journals based on the discovery of “unethical actions”. The papers have all been published since August 2020.

https://principia-scientific.com/major-scientific-publisher-retracts-more-than-500-papers/

A CIA affiliated Medical doctors comments:

“What this means is that they are admitting to all the fraud and lies by the medical profession. There will be numerous lawsuits against universities, colleges and medical centers as a result of this. Think about all the tenure given, and grants, that were awarded based on published papers that were bogus, wrong, and in place due to corruption and bribes, all for money.”

This is what Jacob Rothschild once said on the subject: everyone must be psychologically trained to follow the same commands…Universal vaccination programs not only open the door to behavior control by modifying and amplifying genes, but more importantly for the current operation, psychological behavior control with vaccines is even more fundamental. [Vaccines] are the most unified and compatible psychological weapons ever devised to control human behavior…in any crisis, people act mostly on emotions rather than real facts, critical thinking and common sense."

Looks again like the whores stop fucking when the fiat money bribes dry up.

Comments 1 - 12 of 12        Search these comments

1   Ceffer   2022 Oct 13, 10:08am  

https://principia-scientific.com/major-scientific-publisher-retracts-more-than-500-papers/

"Major Scientific Publisher Retracts More Than 500 Papers"
"One of the world’s largest open-access journal publishers is retracting more than 500 papers, based on the discovery of unethical actions.

London-based Hindawi, which publishes more than 200 peer-reviewed journals across multiple disciplines, stated that its research team identified in June “irregularities” in the peer review process in some of the journals.

Liz Ferguson, a senior vice president for John Wiley & Sons, Hindawi’s U.S.-based parent company, said in a Sept. 28 statement:"

Erasing the trail of bogus papers supporting Covid fraud. Peer review equals panels of paid whores eager to accept Globalist money to warp their findings.
2   Ceffer   2022 Oct 13, 11:08am  

They'll try to gaslight the corruption, but what's the bet none of the perps give any of the money back? Blood on their hands holding the thirty pieces of silver.
3   Ceffer   2022 Oct 13, 11:14am  

The big Pharmas aren't concerned at all because they already have their lobbying and money laundering and legal apparatus in place, and have corporate shells that will collapse like empty Potemkin houses in the face of bankruptcy, while keeping the core organizations intact. J&J already did this successfully in the face of class action suits.

It is why they are so brazenly vested in the Satanic inverse deceptions and just go merrily along doing the same shit over and over without even attempting any more to disguise. Baphomet smiles.
4   Al_Sharpton_for_President   2022 Oct 13, 1:49pm  

Pharma to journals: We've already established that you are a whore, we are just haggling over the price.
5   Patrick   2022 Dec 23, 10:43pm  

https://notthebee.com/article/welp-that-cold-medicine-youre-taking-apparently-does-absolutely-zilch-for-your-congestion

Looks like the company that makes phenylephrine forgot to pay off the right people at the FDA.

Pfizer never forgets those bribe payments, which is why it never has anyone at the FDA seriously look into the massive harm and utter inefficacy of the vaxx.
6   rocketjoe79   2022 Dec 24, 8:53am  

Patrick says

https://notthebee.com/article/welp-that-cold-medicine-youre-taking-apparently-does-absolutely-zilch-for-your-congestion

Looks like the company that makes phenylephrine forgot to pay off the right people at the FDA.

Pfizer never forgets those bribe payments, which is why it never has anyone at the FDA seriously look into the massive harm and utter inefficacy of the vaxx.

But Pfizer did pay the Largest Criminal Fine in history.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history

Not enough to bankrupt them, though. Oh, no, not by a longshot.
The corruption and death-dealing continue. The Covid Vax is just the latest version. This time they wised up - they made sure they couldn't be held accountable with help from Congress to shield them from prosecution.
7   mell   2022 Dec 24, 9:04am  

Patrick says


https://notthebee.com/article/welp-that-cold-medicine-youre-taking-apparently-does-absolutely-zilch-for-your-congestion

Looks like the company that makes phenylephrine forgot to pay off the right people at the FDA.

Pfizer never forgets those bribe payments, which is why it never has anyone at the FDA seriously look into the massive harm and utter inefficacy of the vaxx.

With a cold you can take an anti histamine if needed, a cough suppressant and acetaminophen. There is actually a natural thinner/relaxer that has never bribed the fda, it's guaifenesin.
8   HeadSet   2022 Dec 24, 1:06pm  

rocketjoe79 says

Not enough to bankrupt them, though. Oh, no, not by a longshot.

Only about 2 weeks worth of Pfizer revenue.
9   Patrick   2023 Jan 14, 8:16pm  

https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-lancet-has-become-a-laughing


The Lancet has become a laughing stock




In summary:

On 6 May 2021 The Lancet published a blatantly flawed study of the effectiveness of the Pfizer covid vaccine on the population of Israel, claiming it was 95% effective.

On 17 May 2021 we submitted a rapid response 250 word letter explaining why the study was flawed.

After an initial response saying they would ask the authors for a response to our letter we heard nothing until 20 months later.

On 8 January 2023 we got an email out of the blue from The Lancet Senior Editor Josefine Gibson apologising for never having got back to us about the letter, saying that they had asked the lead author Dr Sharon Alroy-Preis (SA-P) to respond to our letter but, because she did not provide any formal response, they have decided not to publish our letter.

We tweeted The Lancet's response and within 24 hours it got over one million impressions. We also published a substack article highlighting the fact we were now aware of additional problems with the paper relating to SA-P’s relationship with Pfizer.

On 10 January 2023 we got an unsolicited email from Josefine Gibson (which we can only assume was a result of the reputation hit they got from our tweet) saying “Thank you for bringing your letter from May 2021 back to our attention. We are looking into next steps and will get back to you as soon as we can.” ...


Formerly "scientific" journals are now toilet paper wiping the ass of Pfizer.
10   Patrick   2023 Jan 14, 8:19pm  

Here's a journal which claims no whoredom, and maybe they are telling the truth about that.

https://pdmj.org/papers/masks_false_safety_and_real_dangers_part1


Primary Doctor Medical Journal
A peer-reviewed journal by physicians and scientists without commercial influence

Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 1: Friable mask particulate and lung vulnerability
Boris Borovoy, Colleen Huber, Q Makeeta
July 6, 2020

... Masked individuals have measurably higher inspiratory flow than non-masked individuals. This study is of new masks removed from manufacturer packaging, as well as a laundered cloth mask, examined microscopically. Loose particulate was seen on each type of mask. Also, tight and loose fibers were seen on each type of mask. If every foreign particle and every fiber in every facemask is always secure and not detachable by airflow, then there should be no risk of inhalation of such particles and fibers. However, if even a small portion of mask fibers is detachable by inspiratory airflow, or if there is debris in mask manufacture or packaging or handling, then there is the possibility of not only entry of foreign material to the airways, but also entry to deep lung tissue, and potential pathological consequences of foreign bodies in the lungs.
11   HeadSet   2023 Jan 15, 8:44pm  

Patrick says

Formerly "scientific" journals are now toilet paper wiping the ass of Pfizer.

Maybe those journals always shilled for Big Med and it is just obvious now.
12   Ceffer   2023 Jan 15, 10:05pm  

Clif High had a video on the corruption of the peer review process. If they can bribe entire medical institutions and high end doctors to lie and pander to politically motivated medical delusions, they can certainly bribe peer reviewers who would like a new Benz.

Problem is, with credibility shot, how far back does it go? At what date of generative publications can we go back to in which the system could be believed?

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions