patrick.net

That's a good question I would like to know, too. A non-Stasi doctor.

Here is a vaccine lawyer, who might be able to postpone or interdict any force fed vaccination attempts, but as we all know, lawyers are big bux and it could go on forever.
https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/leadership/greg-glaser-jd/

Also, the root directory for physicians for informed consent: https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/

https://youtu.be/XBLlbTvf-wU Bad Tube, sorry Pat.

Ceffer says

Also, the root directory for physicians for informed consent: https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/

Thanks, this is interesting:

https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-risk-statement/

For children 12 to 15 years of age, the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial found the overall incidence of severe adverse events during the two-month observation period to be 10.7%, or 1 in 9, in the vaccinated group and 1.9% in the unvaccinated group, resulting in a vaccine risk of 8.8% or 1 in 11 vaccinated children.11,12

Ceffer says

That's a good question I would like to know, too. A non-Stasi doctor.

Here is a vaccine lawyer, who might be able to postpone or interdict any force fed vaccination attempts, but as we all know, lawyers are big bux and it could go on forever.
https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/leadership/greg-glaser-jd/

Also, the root directory for physicians for informed consent: https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/

https://youtu.be/XBLlbTvf-wU Bad Tube, sorry Pat.

https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/cic/

This is something to start with. Thank you.

I cannot go into detail about why he almost is being forced. It's not job related.

Patrick says

Ceffer says

Also, the root directory for physicians for informed consent: https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/

Thanks, this is interesting:

https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-risk-statement/

For children 12 to 15 years of age, the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial found the overall incidence of severe adverse events during the two-month observation period to be 10.7%, or 1 in 9, in the vaccinated group and 1.9% in the unvaccinated group, resulting in a vaccine risk of 8.8% or 1 in 11 vaccinated children.11,12

This is fucking insane.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7023e1.htm

0.5 to 2 kids in 100000 need hospitalization from covid. So the agent has a 1000 fold chance of maiming a kid. Fuck these murderous bastards! Hang em high

https://nojabforme.info/#startenglish
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/

richwicks says

I cannot go into detail about why he almost is being forced. It's not job related.

I suspect there may be ex-Family involved, this may be of use:
https://awakenny.wordpress.com/2021/06/26/how-to-write-a-religious-exemption-letter/

Notarizing the Letter and perhaps getting a MInister/Pastor to issue the letter (regardless of current affiliation, such as "After several conversations on the subject I know John Doe to be passionately committed to such-and-such based beliefs") may help. In California, I am sure there are also Leftish Hippy "Spiritual" Figures into "Natural Therapies" that may write/sign such a document.

Check out www.avoiceforchoiceadvocacy.org they have info on Religious exemptions.

richwicks says

He needs to travel ONCE

I know someone who is fully fully fully vaccinated and got "Covid passport". He needed to travel to India and found that everyone is required to show recent (less than a week) test result to get into plane. So getting "Covid passport" is just not enough now.

Blue says

richwicks says

He needs to travel ONCE

I know someone who is fully fully fully vaccinated and got "Covid passport". He needed to travel to India and found that everyone is required to show recent (less than a week) test result to get into plane. So getting "Covid passport" is just not enough now.

Different nation. If it was just a test, he'd take it. If I explain more completely but I may be revealing his identify.

He needs proof of vaccination, but he doesn't want the vaccination. A doctor that will prescribe opioids for example, would probably be suitable.

It's a matter of establishing mutual trust and since this is on the border of, let's say ethics, it's difficult. I've never attempted to do anything like this before, but since I'm a degree of separation it's safer for me to investigate this than him. This really is for a friend. I will never bow down to being forcibly injected, under any circumstances but I will never be in the position he has inadvertently been forced into.

Catholics:
"[Date]
To Whom It May Concern,
[Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines.
The Roman Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her informed conscience comes to this sure judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of any vaccine, and generally encourages the use of safe and effective vaccines as a way of safeguarding personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious basis on which a Catholic may determine that he or she ought to refuse certain vaccines:
• Vaccination is not morally obligatory in principle and so must be voluntary.1
• There is a general moral duty to refuse the use of medical products, including certain vaccines, that
are produced using human cells lines derived from direct abortions. It is permissible to use such
vaccines only under certain case-specific conditions, based on a judgment of conscience.2
• A person’s informed judgments about the proportionality of medical interventions are to be
respected unless they contradict authoritative Catholic moral teachings.3
• A person is morally required to obey his or her sure conscience.4
A Catholic may judge it wrong to receive certain vaccines for a variety of reasons consistent with these teachings, and there is no authoritative Church teaching universally obliging Catholics to receive any vaccine. An individual Catholic may invoke Church teaching to refuse a vaccine developed or produced using abortion- derived cell lines. More generally, a Catholic might refuse a vaccine based on the Church’s teachings concerning therapeutic proportionality. Therapeutic proportionality is an assessment of whether the benefits of a medical intervention outweigh the undesirable side-effects and burdens in light of the integral good of the person, including spiritual, psychological, and bodily goods.5 It can also extend to the good of others and the common good, which likewise entail spiritual and moral dimensions and are not reducible to public health. The judgment of therapeutic proportionality must be made by the person who is the potential recipient of the intervention in the concrete circumstances,6 not by public health authorities or by other individuals who might judge differently in their own situations.
At the core of the Church’s teaching are the first and last points listed above: vaccination is not a universal obligation and a person must obey the judgment of his or her own informed and certain conscience. In fact, the Catechism of the Catholic Church instructs that following one’s conscience is following Christ Himself:
In all he says and does, man is obliged to follow faithfully what he knows to be just and right. It is by the judgment of his conscience that man perceives and recognizes the prescriptions of the divine law: “Conscience is a law of the mind; yet [Christians] would not grant that it is nothing more; . . . [Conscience] is a messenger of him, who, both in nature and in grace, speaks to us behind a veil, and teaches and rules us by his representatives. Conscience is the aboriginal Vicar of Christ.”7
Therefore, if a Catholic comes to an informed and sure judgment in conscience that he or she should not receive a vaccine, then the Catholic Church requires that the person follow this certain judgment of conscience and refuse the vaccine. The Catechism is clear: “Man has the right to act in conscience and in freedom so as personally to make moral decisions. ‘He must not be forced to act contrary to his conscience. Nor must he be prevented from acting according to his conscience, especially in religious matters.’”8
Sincerely in Christ,
[Name]'

Doesn't matter what the Satanist Pope says, the Church's ethical position is stated above.

I know of one in Rhode Island.

Booger says

I know of one in Rhode Island.

I may take you up on this. He's got a little more than a month but he can travel.

Ceffer says

https://nojabforme.info/#startenglish

Thanks @Ceffer

Didn't know about this one. Looks useful.

Houston is full of pill mills, at least was before covid. I wonder if these "docs" with scruples that can't be seen under microscope would sign fake coof vaccination papers.

To hear don't get vaccinated from the doctor,
what is the right set of questions for the primary scare doctor who sends reminders to get vaccinated. Also get sms alerts from the county!?
like, how much insurance did hospital pay to vaccinated victims so far. Is there is paper work to be done about insurance coverage before getting a jab. etc
Ideally want to use his reply to show at work to avoid mandatory vaccination requirement. Appreciate in advance.

bump :)
appreciate if someone has any idea on how to get a note from doc. saying something like 'no vaccine required now or wait until...' to show it at work to get an exception.

How about a pharmacist who would consent to squirting that shit into the trash and giving you a fake jab? For consideration perhaps. Idk.

They are out there, and we shouldn't be touting or promoting it, or they will develop a test to see if you have the vax, and the vax passport will no longer be a thing. But testing to confirm the vax will be..

That being said, I have a buddy that told me his doctor gave him a jab in the sink. He had to get the vax for his work.

To whom it may concern:
The patient suffers from a rare vaccine rage syndrome. He once tore the face off a school nurse who did not bother to read his medical file which warned against vaccination. It's a Tourettes type syndrome. He loses control when he is vaccinated and is not responsible for what happens. Specialists have prescribed a series of medications which had no effect and, in a few cases, made things worse. This patient is waived from any vaccine requirement.
Sincerely, Doctor Vinnie Booombatz.

@Blue Since the jab is "free" (meaning at taxpayer expense) it would not cost you anything to go around to many injection places and try to pay to get one squirted onto the ground so you can get the card.

Since the government is directly and dangerously violating your right to bodily integrity by failing to ban jab mandates, they no longer have any legitimacy.