0
0

Ben Jones & Patrick: Psychics or Super-Geniuses?


 invite response                
2007 Mar 6, 9:13am   18,787 views  179 comments

by HARM   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

Patrick's alter ego? Ben Jones - mathematical genius?

As the rolling bubble crash gathers steam, and even formerly hostile MSM sources now reluctantly admit the bubble --and its bursting-- is undeniably real, one question remains: how did people like Patrick Killelea and Ben Jones correctly predict all this so accurately beforehand?

Nearly two years ago, Ben and Patrick founded their now-famous blogs, dedicated to the national housing bubble. They boldly predicted its demise as "inevitable" long, long before most industry experts would even admit the bubble even existed. Now events are unfolding almost like clockwork, almost exactly as predicted:

  • Exhaustion and unaffordability leads first to falling sales & rising inventories, but very sticky prices (at first).
  • Inability to continue flipping and/or serially refinancing forces flippers and over-leveraged FBs to try to exit, spiking inventories and gradually un-sticking prices in successive waves of option-ARM resets.
  • Failure to indefinitely to hide default/foreclosure/repurchase losses off the balance sheets forces many sub-prime operators and MSB issuers out of business, drying up liquidity.
  • The MEW-ATM shutdown spills over into the general economy and either triggers a general recession, or at the very least, localized recessions in extreme-bubble regions.
  • The crash slowly grinds away over years, eroding homedebtor equity via a combination of inflation and nominal price drops, until the price-rent/price-income equilibrium is finally restored.
  • Finally, the rolling crash becomes obvious even to the most clueless FB and the cheerleading MSM. Newsweek issues it's "Housing: Worst Investment Ever!" cover story, close to the exact market bottom.
  • My questions: how could such seemingly average Joes ever predict such events when the brightest, most highly paid industry experts could not? I mean, David Lereah went from "no bubble" to "correction's over" in like 30 seconds flat! If the danger signs were so obvious, then why didn't we hear about them beforehand from the NAR... the Fed... Wall Street? It's not as if these frequently quoted (and rarely challenged) "industry experts" could possibly have known about this mess beforehand, but just kept it to themselves for some reason. Like, that's just conspiratorial, tinfoil-hat wing-nuttery, right?

    So, if the only way to perceive an asset/credit bubble is after-the-fact (as Sir Alan Greenspan has asserted), then how could Ben and Patrick possibly have known about it that far back? Are they psychic? Are these guys prescient modern-day Nostradamus-es? Or, are they financial super-wizards --real-life Hari Seldons-- who can accurately predict the future with mathematical precision, but posing as regular guys? If the housing bubble was so impossible to predict, even with access to the very best market data and cutting-edge computing power (as the experts insist it was), then how could two ordinary working-class stiffs manage to pull off such a feat by themselves?

    Should we be concerned that Patrick and Ben are some form of genetically mutated super-geniuses hiding in plain sight?? How else could they possibly have foreseen the unforeseeable?

    Spooky, isn't it? :roll:

    Discuss, enjoy...
    HARM

    #housing

    « First        Comments 140 - 179 of 179        Search these comments

    140   MtViewRenter   2007 Mar 7, 7:46am  

    Peter P,

    You're right, 237 W from 101 N. The only times I go that way is at night, so I haven't noticed how wide the merge zone is.

    Anyone know how to tell if you're dyslexic? That'd explain a lot of things....

    141   Allah   2007 Mar 7, 7:49am  

    Really pissed me off. When will this crap end?

    When the last toxic loan peddler files for Chapter 11. Which should not be too long from now:

    http://ml-implode.com/

    ...and don't forget, as each toxic loan peddler goes out of business, the remaining peddlers have less competition so they can afford to raise rates.

    142   Peter P   2007 Mar 7, 7:53am  

    Anyone know how to tell if you’re dyslexic? That’d explain a lot of things….

    Dyslexic is a sign of genius because you are thinking faster than you can talk or type.

    Merge zones usually look smaller than they are. You can look at the satellite map of that area.

    http://tinyurl.com/33cbed

    But I advise extreme caution in all merges.

    143   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 7:53am  

    …and don’t forget, as each toxic loan peddler goes out of business, the remaining peddlers have less competition so they can afford to raise rates.

    They may have to raise rates just to sell those mortgages on as Wallstreet is waking up to the subprime risk.

    144   Peter P   2007 Mar 7, 7:54am  

    s/Dyslexic/Dyslexia

    145   Allah   2007 Mar 7, 8:10am  

    …and don’t forget, as each toxic loan peddler goes out of business, the remaining peddlers have less competition so they can afford to raise rates.

    They may have to raise rates just to sell those mortgages on as Wallstreet is waking up to the subprime risk.

    Yes, that too; but the reason they lowered their rates so much in the first place was because they had so much competition that they figured they would make it up in volume by lowering their standards. Now that they are dropping like flies they are losing their competition; should become very interesting this spring.

    146   skibum   2007 Mar 7, 8:11am  

    I don’t pretend to actually understand the advantages of a roundabout/rotary. We have a good number of them in Boston near where I grew up.

    MtViewRenter,

    I bike to work nearly every day, including back when we were living in Boston. Imagine trying to make it through rotaries on your bike in a sea of Masshole drivers!

    The particularly scary ones for me were the one just on the Cambridge side of the BU bridge and the one on JamaicaWay as it splits off to Centre St.

    147   tsusiat   2007 Mar 7, 8:11am  

    Hey HARM,

    I would have to agree that Patrick and Ben were before there time in one sense, they put up these websites. However, the fact so many people were attracted to them from the outset, whether they were labeled JBRs or not, shows that there was a lot of public opinion already forming around the idea that housing prices were insane and unsustainable.

    I got hurt in the stock crash around 2000, and it just seemed so obvious to me since 2001 that money had flowed by the boatload into real estate, that maybe used to be somewhere else, like the stock market.

    I'll admit, my understanding of economics is somewhat limited. Anyway, for that reason, plus the craziness of prices jumping here 30-40% per year, I just had to believe that there would be some kind of opposite reaction.

    So I don't know if Patrick and Ben are geniuses, but they certainly tapped into the zeitgiest, or spirit of the times, if you know what I mean.

    148   StuckInBA   2007 Mar 7, 8:15am  

    NV :

    I don't see the meltdown. The DQ news SJMN page actually shows good gains for both SC and SM county. Some zip codes are quite down, some are doing extremely good. It's kind of weird. What's with Sunnyvale ? 3 zip codes are up over 10% ? Must have been the new homes.

    149   FormerAptBroker   2007 Mar 7, 8:26am  

    SFBubbleBuyer Says:

    > Here’s a distress sale in Saratoga. They’re trying to get
    > 950,000 for the property, and if you look back at zillow,
    > the property was last bought in 2000 for $750k.

    The title records say that the current owner Shahin Jahanbani bought the place from Jason W. Frankenfield on 4/8/05 for $1,050,000

    > They won’t work with any other realtors, which says to me that
    > 950K is just about the least they can accept while getting out
    > from under their mortgage, which suggests 920K in debt.

    They suppressed the purchase price and total debt from the title records. I was able to back in to the purchase price at 98% of the 2006 tax bill (in CA under Prop 13. the assessed value goes up 2% a year.

    150   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 8:39am  

    Median prices can go up while house prices go down as buyers who 'stretched' in their brains what they would have to spend to get a decent house see houses they couldn't afford now drop down into their 'top' price range. Instead of buying the same house they could have bought in 2005 for 60k less, they buy the house they couldn't have afforded in 2005.

    It's a whole NEW class of people who could easily go underwater if they don't drop 20% down. When will they 'graduate' back to being renters?

    151   Peter P   2007 Mar 7, 8:41am  

    Instead of buying the same house they could have bought in 2005 for 60k less, they buy the house they couldn’t have afforded in 2005.

    That is very reasonable indeed, considering that most people feel that they could not afford what they need.

    152   Peter P   2007 Mar 7, 8:42am  

    I prefer to spend less if at all possible. I still want to enjoy sushi as a homeowner. :)

    153   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 8:43am  

    The title records say that the current owner Shahin Jahanbani bought the place from Jason W. Frankenfield on 4/8/05 for $1,050,000

    Ouch. If only he'd waited 2 more months he could have nailed the peak for sure!

    So he's only losing 13%ish (with fees) in a year... plus the interest paid.

    154   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 8:47am  

    Peter P said :
    That is very reasonable indeed, considering that most people feel that they could not afford what they need.

    That's a pretty good point. In fact, I told my wife if we were going to buy in a bubble (especially a deflating one), it'd have to be a house we'd stay in for at least 10+ years, preferrably 30+, so we're only considering houses good for kids even though we don't have any yet. I might buy the most house I can afford even with a slump in prices if it was a house I was sure I wouldn't have to leave. Hopefully most of the people buying now are doing the same thing. I'd hate to think of buying now and having to move in 5 years.

    155   Peter P   2007 Mar 7, 8:49am  

    I’d hate to think of buying now and having to move in 5 years.

    Not unless prices double again in 5 years. ;)

    156   Allah   2007 Mar 7, 8:52am  

    Ceo of Toll Brothers say worst is over

    D.R. Horton CEO: '2007 is going to suck'

    157   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 8:53am  

    I’d hate to think of buying now and having to move in 5 years.

    Not unless prices double again in 5 years.

    If I thought they would, I'd buy. Of course, I'd be wondering who was going to pay for a 1.8 million dollar home in Sunnyvale...

    158   Peter P   2007 Mar 7, 8:54am  

    Of course, I’d be wondering who was going to pay for a 1.8 million dollar home in Sunnyvale…

    The question would be, what dollar? ;)

    159   Allah   2007 Mar 7, 8:55am  

    Hopefully most of the people buying now are doing the same thing. I’d hate to think of buying now and having to move in 5 years.

    No one ever really plans on selling in a short amount of time; but they wind up doing it anyway.

    160   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 9:00am  

    No one ever really plans on selling in a short amount of time; but they wind up doing it anyway.

    I'm pretty sure the people getting on the ride on the way up figured they could move if they needed to, and even make money doing it. Buying now is almost guarenteeing that you can't move for at least 10 years without losing tons of money. And probably buying right now, you won't realize a 'real' break even until after the mortgage is paid off and you start living the TI lifestyle.

    161   HARM   2007 Mar 7, 9:08am  

    D.R. Horton CEO: ‘2007 is going to suck’

    I'd say that's language plain enough even for Joe Six-pack to grasp.

    162   skibum   2007 Mar 7, 9:14am  

    Ceo of Toll Brothers say worst is over

    D.R. Horton CEO: ‘2007 is going to suck’

    This is interesting considering there's a recent piece in the WSJ analyzing the big HBs for the next year. They think exactly the opposite - HBs focusing on the lower range market like DR Horton or Centex with national (read diverse) exposure will likely do best, while luxury builders like Toll may be in for a lot of hurt. I sense yet more BS spin from Toll and maybe even a glimmer of realism from DR Horton.

    163   StuckInBA   2007 Mar 7, 9:20am  

    The problems is MSM still reports median and that's what get's discussed at the dinner parties.

    But I think the following supports what many of us have mentioned as anecdotal evidence. I continue to believe that the BA housing market is indeed in a strong downturn which is superficially masked by good job market and cheap credit.

    From the perma-bull site http://sanjoseproperty.com/newsletter.html

    For sellers, while sales are increasing, they're still not at the level we saw during 2003-2005. The market is also quite different. Back then, anything sold. Now, buyers are being very particular. They want homes in the best neighborhoods and in move-in condition.

    Hence all the weird statistics and median madness. One day, even MSM will start printing that median is bogus.

    164   skibum   2007 Mar 7, 9:31am  

    The problems is MSM still reports median and that’s what get’s discussed at the dinner parties.

    But I think the following supports what many of us have mentioned as anecdotal evidence. I continue to believe that the BA housing market is indeed in a strong downturn which is superficially masked by good job market and cheap credit.

    Stuck,
    As I think you well know, if you look at all of the more sophisticated RE analysis out there, uniformly they all note that a decrease in sales volume (like we've seen for over a year now) is a leading indicator before price declines inevitably follow. That's just economic common sense. When sales dry up, eventually there is downward price pressure, no matter how much kool-aid is in the tap water in the Bay Area. I would almost be willing to say further price declines, even measured by the blunt and innacurate median price, are "in the bag," to borrow a corrupted phrase...

    165   OO   2007 Mar 7, 9:47am  

    SFBubblebuyer,

    that is the bad part of Saratoga, east of 85. In essence, Saratoga wannabes who cannot afford the real Saratoga shoot for that part of town simply because of the address although it looks and feels like San Jose.

    It also goes to the Moreland school district. If that house is situated a bit to the left so that it will fall into the Lynbrook school district, it would not have been so "distressed", at least you can count on a few Asian parents bidding it up.

    166   Allah   2007 Mar 7, 9:49am  

    DR Horton builds lower end homes btw, which jives well with the sub-prime mortgage market.


    Stacey Dwyer, said subprime borrowers - those with weaker credit histories - account for fewer than 5 percent of its customers.

    167   Allah   2007 Mar 7, 9:58am  

    They are lying! Filty bastards.

    Haven't we already determined this?

    168   EBGuy   2007 Mar 7, 10:05am  

    I am with StuckInBA on this one. It ain't melting down in Santa Clara... yet (even sales volume is only marginally down).
    Here are aggregate numbers that NV didn't post

    Community Price % Chg* $/SqFt # Sold % Chg*
    All homes $669,500 2.2% $467 1,551 -1.6%
    Total resale houses $730,000 4.3% $485 949 -5.4%
    Total condominiums $510,000 4.5% $434 341 -1.2%
    Total new homes $633,500 7.1% 261 14.5%

    169   Bruce   2007 Mar 7, 10:08am  

    I see FDIC just issued cease and desist against Fremont.

    http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/index.html

    170   OO   2007 Mar 7, 10:12am  

    NV,

    I belong to one of those you are talking about (from HK initially and came here around the time you mentioned). But the new wave of Chinese coming here from mainland China are quite different, they have never seen capitalism growing up. Also, those who came here later never saw the bad times so their frame of reference became very skewed.

    Not all Chinese are shrewd and smart. Chinese culture (and Japanese too) is largely centered on herd mentality and conformity. If everyone is buying in Saratoga, you have to buy one there. If everyone is investing in real estate, you will look like an outcast if you don't.

    That's why I kept my mouth shut in the last few years among my Chinese friends when they became so excited over the housing market. They tend to put personal pride into business judgement, if you question the business decision, it will be taken as a challenge to his intelligence and pride.

    Many of my Chinese friends and acquaintances did participate in bidding wars in the last few years. They still do.

    171   OO   2007 Mar 7, 10:16am  

    NV,

    you are also mixing up being shrewd with being cheap. All Chinese are cheap, but only very few of us are actually shrewd.

    If you see a popular Chinese restaurant with lots of Chinese patrons, I can guarantee that it is not because of the food, it's because of the price. Chinese grocery markets here usually offer the rock-bottom price taking the quality along with it.

    Being shrewd means getting the best bang for the buck. Jews are much better than Chinese in that respect. Chinese are just good at parting with the least buck.

    172   StuckInBA   2007 Mar 7, 10:32am  

    OO,

    I have asked you before and ask you again. Are you sure you are talking about Chinese people ? I can say the same thing about Indians, Indian grocery markets etc ;-)

    The herd mentality part although comes from being immigrant. Indians in India do not have any "extra" herd mentality than other societies. Conformity and cost consciousness are trademark of my generation. The freshly minted rich youngsters from Banglore are spendthrifts and VERY VERY different.

    Even though I feel Indian buyers haven't come around to accept that RE prices can decline big time, it seems that no one is afraid to be priced out forever. Just my gut feeling. They just feel smarter to buy at a lower price than last year.

    173   StuckInBA   2007 Mar 7, 10:48am  

    The TOL CEO must be desperate to try this ridiculous spin. Cancellations can go to zero but what's the big deal if sales also go to zero ? Cancellations are important only to identify change of sentiment from positive to negative. If sales don't pick up, who cares how cancellations are doing ? People cannot cancel orders they have never placed.

    Maybe DELL can learn something from them. "Not as many people are placing orders, but that's not important. What is important is not as many people are canceling their orders. WOOOOOHOOO."

    174   StuckInBA   2007 Mar 7, 10:52am  

    I see FDIC just issued cease and desist against Fremont.

    Tomorrow I will cray half a tear for FMT bottom feeders. Hmm. Maybe not.

    175   StuckInBA   2007 Mar 7, 10:52am  

    s/cray/cry

    176   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 10:57am  

    You mean, like these townhomes “starting in the $1,500,000″ range?

    To be fair, most of their offerings are a little cheaper than that. :) And that IS Shallow Alto they're building in, there.

    177   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 11:04am  

    I'm just saying that most of what they build is cheaper than 1.5 million, not that housing isn't retarded right now.

    178   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 11:27am  

    At least you didn't offer to refi my home with an option ARM, PAR. :)

    179   HARM   2007 Mar 8, 3:09am  

    AG,

    Welcome to the blog! Come breathe the free air of Truth.

    Maine politicians complain of “brain drain” and can’t figure out why so many young people leave.

    Once again, I think that Upton Sinclair quote applies:

    "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it."

    All politicians are afraid of saying ANYTHING negative about loanownership --regardless of what they really think-- because:

    (a) It's the "Amerikan Dreamâ„¢", and you... do... love Amerika, don't you...?
    (b) Nearly 70% of their constituents are loanowners vs. JBRs.
    (c) The percentage of loanowners who regularly vote is also significantly higher than JBRs.
    (d) They are getting an a$$load of lobbyist money and campaign contributions from NAR/NAHB/MBAA and like organizations.

    State and local politicians are even MORE beholden to the REIC, because state/local budgets get a disproportionate share of their tax revenue from property owners.

    It's all about knowing which side your bread is buttered on...

    « First        Comments 140 - 179 of 179        Search these comments

    Please register to comment:

    api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions