patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,189,915 comments by 13,850 users - PeopleUnited, RC2006, Stout, UkraineIsTotallyFucked online now
NY Times to give up on Russia hoax, to push "racism" hoax hard instead
invite response
2019 Aug 17, 10:43am 909 views 7 comments
Comments 1 - 7 of 7 Search these comments
3
Patrick
2019 Aug 17, 10:52am
Patrick
2019 Aug 17, 10:52am
Powell at least had the integrity to admit he lied and manipulated the public:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2005-09-09/powell-regrets-un-speech-on-iraq-wmds/2099674
The NY Times never had the integrity to admit they lied about Iraq and manipulated the public into supporting war.
But then, it's obvious every day that the NY Times lacks integrity.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2005-09-09/powell-regrets-un-speech-on-iraq-wmds/2099674
Former US secretary of state Colin Powell says his United Nations speech making the case for the US-led war on Iraq was "a blot" on his record.
Mr Powell has also said that he had "never seen evidence to suggest" a connection between the September 11, 2001 terror attacks in the United States and the Saddam regime.
In the February 2003 presentation to the UN Security Council, Mr Powell forcefully made the case for war on the regime of Saddam Hussein, offering "proof" that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
The NY Times never had the integrity to admit they lied about Iraq and manipulated the public into supporting war.
But then, it's obvious every day that the NY Times lacks integrity.
4
Ceffer
2019 Aug 17, 10:54am
Ceffer
2019 Aug 17, 10:54am
"All Of The Manipulative and Mendacious Shit That's Fit To Shove Down The Public's Throat." Ratchet open, people ratchet open.
5
FuckTheMainstreamMedia
2019 Aug 17, 11:00am
FuckTheMainstreamMedia
2019 Aug 17, 11:00am
Patrick says
This is because honesty, integrity and truth mean absolutely nothing to the left...its not a leftist value at all.
To a leftist there is no religion, there is no importnace of sticking to your word. And its very evident in the leftist politicians that are monopolizing the Democrat presidential nomination race.
This must be why I despise the left so greatly. I'm a ISTJ personality type. My word is my promise, my honor. I can't reasonably deal with people who dont understand and respect that. Leftists don't.
Powell at least had the integrity to admit he lied and manipulated the public:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2005-09-09/powell-regrets-un-speech-on-iraq-wmds/2099674Former US secretary of state Colin Powell says his United Nations speech making the case for the US-led war on Iraq was "a blot" on his record.
Mr Powell has also said that he had "never seen evidence to suggest" a connection between the September 11, 2001 terror attacks in the United States and the Saddam regime.
In the February 2003 presentation to the UN Security Council, Mr Powell forcefully made the case for war on the regime of Saddam Hussein, offering "proof" that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
The NY Times never had the integrity to admit they lied about Iraq and manipulated the public into supporting war.
But then, it's obvious every day t...
This is because honesty, integrity and truth mean absolutely nothing to the left...its not a leftist value at all.
To a leftist there is no religion, there is no importnace of sticking to your word. And its very evident in the leftist politicians that are monopolizing the Democrat presidential nomination race.
This must be why I despise the left so greatly. I'm a ISTJ personality type. My word is my promise, my honor. I can't reasonably deal with people who dont understand and respect that. Leftists don't.
6
Patrick
2019 Aug 17, 12:29pm
Patrick
2019 Aug 17, 12:29pm
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
You'd think there would be at least a little bit of hard evidence by now if so.
Yet... nothing.
I'd be grateful to hear some clear and convincing proof, not just that Trump's maid's son-in law once heard Russian spoken on the street and thought they said something about Trump.
It was proven true and no one cared.
You'd think there would be at least a little bit of hard evidence by now if so.
Yet... nothing.
I'd be grateful to hear some clear and convincing proof, not just that Trump's maid's son-in law once heard Russian spoken on the street and thought they said something about Trump.
7
SunnyvaleCA
2019 Aug 17, 1:28pm
Washington Examiner Says
I think we should start calling it the "Weissman report" — that's what it really is. From Mueller's testimony, it's apparent Mueller is only vaguely familiar with the report. Calling it the Weissman report makes more sense, as Weissman has been a hit-man in other legal government ventures before.
Mueller report
I think we should start calling it the "Weissman report" — that's what it really is. From Mueller's testimony, it's apparent Mueller is only vaguely familiar with the report. Calling it the Weissman report makes more sense, as Weissman has been a hit-man in other legal government ventures before.
If one lie doesn't work, try another.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/08/new-york-times-meeting-transcript.html
Why he was elected?
Seriously? It's not that we don't understand The Times. It's that The Times does not understand itself.
Trump was elected because of you, dear NY Times, and because of all the wealthy coastal elite liberal smarmy self-righteous accusatory inflammatory reality-denying institutions like you which have greatly divided and weakened our country.
You are part of the problem, not part of the solution. The problem is the mass export of jobs and mass import of illegals which leaves ordinary Americans to suffer while you ignore it and try to whip up hysteria about Russia, and when that doesn't work, about "racism".
Good lord.