1
0

Seven Reasons To Be Highly Skeptical Of The Gulf Of Oman Incident


 invite response                
2019 Jun 14, 5:17pm   482 views  1 comment

by WillPowers   ➕follow (3)   💰tip   ignore  

1. Pompeo is a known liar, especially when it comes to Iran.

2. The US empire is known to use lies and false flags to start wars.

3. John Bolton has openly endorsed lying to advance military agendas.

4. Using false flags to start a war with Iran is already an established idea in the DC swamp.
Back in 2012 at a forum for the Washington Institute Of Near East Policy think tank, the group’s Director of Research Patrick Clawson openly talked about the possibility of using a false flag to provoke a war with Iran, citing the various ways the US has done exactly that with its previous wars.

5. The US State Department has already been running psyops to manipulate the public Iran narrative.
State Department officials admitted to Congressional staff at a closed-door meeting on Monday that a $1.5 million troll farm had gone “beyond the scope of its mandate” by aggressively smearing American critics of the Trump administration’s Iran policy as propagandists for the Iranian government, according to a new report from The Independent. That “mandate” had reportedly consisted of “countering propaganda from Iran”, also known as conducting anti-Iran propaganda.

6. The Gulf of Oman narrative makes no sense.
Iran has been conducting itself with remarkable restraint in the face of relentless sanctions and provocations from the US and its allies; it wouldn’t make much sense for it to suddenly abandon that restraint with attacks on sea vessels, then rescue their crew, then deny perpetrating the attacks, during a time of diplomatic exchanges and while trying to preserve the nuclear dealwith Europe. If Tehran did perpetrate the attacks in order to send a strong message to the Americans, it would have been a very mixed message sent in a very weird way with very odd timing.

7. Even if Iran did perpetrate the attack, Pompeo would still be lying.
As noted in this article by Moon of Alabama and this discussion on the Ron Paul Liberty Report, the US has been provoking Iran with extremely aggressive and steadily tightening sanctions, which means that even if Tehran is behind the attacks, it would not be the aggressor and the attacks would most certainly not have been “unprovoked”.

SEE: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-06-14/seven-reasons-be-highly-skeptical-gulf-oman-incident

Comments 1 - 1 of 1        Search these comments

1   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Jun 14, 5:32pm  

Iran is very, very desperate and has used attacks in the past when the Mullahs feel under pressure, which America's Sanctions most certainly are doing, big time.

If you want to know a little bit more about these CIA-Mullah connections, check out the Council for the National Interest, where ex-CIA Philip Giraldi was a board member, it also counted Abdul Rahman, now serving 23 years for funding Al Qaeda and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, as a board member also. Giraldi was also Ron Paul's foreign affairs advisor in the past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Rahman_al-Amoudi

Brennan, another Iranian symp, is probably at the center - or close to it - of Spygate, the fraudulently obtained wiretap warrants on Trump's Campaign.

Powers unmasked 300+ people in just one year. Evil Ol' Bolton only unmasked like 3 people in his entire tenure as UN Ambassador.

It's interesting that the worst people have several common threads running through them.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions