« First « Previous Comments 71 - 87 of 87 Search these comments
None of the facts you listed are wrong. But all I am saying is your small brain can think of only 500yrs. Where as the history out there is much-much older.
You guys are complaining that all the problems India has is its own.
indc saysYou guys are complaining that all the problems India has is its own.
I'd argue that India hitching it's wagon to the USSR and flirting with Communism did far more harm to the people living today than the British colonial rule.
Why would chinese and japanese complain they were not occupied and looted by europeans of both materials and knowledge. Africa and India did.
None of the facts you listed are wrong. But all I am saying is your small brain can think of only 500yrs. Where as the history out there is much-much older.
Where did you get stupid idea that buddhists are outsiders to India.
Persians and Indians are pretty much the same.
indc saysWhere did you get stupid idea that buddhists are outsiders to India.
First of all, Buddhism spread beyond the modern day region of India, right after the so-called Gautama lived. So yes, you can say that the Vedic culture was India's monopoly but that wasn't the case for Buddhism.
The part of the eastern Persian Empire, Bactria, in the region which is today's Afghanistan, was a Buddhist nation-state in ancient times, long before the coming of Islam, as well as Alexander's conquests. Both Zoroastrianism and Buddhism existed in the Persian Empire.
indc saysPersians and Indians are pretty much the same.
Not really, because there are no South Indians (ppl of Tamil) in Persia.
Like I said wait for few more years, when we have our own history then we can debunk those racist theories.
Now you are saying that buddhism is owned by outsiders.
Or you mean buddhist outsiders attacked india back even though they are buddhists?
Do you even know that most of India was buddhist at one time
indc saysLike I said wait for few more years, when we have our own history then we can debunk those racist theories.
If you want to know how this 'racist' theory came to me, it wasn't from some Anglo-Saxon lecturer at Oxbridge. It was actually from a few Indians. In particular, a Brahmin, whose family came from New Delhi, and a Parsi, whose family once lived in Bombay/Mumbai.
It was their grandparents and relatives who'd told 'em that the so-called fair skin ppl were always coming into India, throughout history. And yes, these fellas were definitely whiter than any Indians I'd ever seen before. And conversely, Dravidians, which includes Tamil Nadu & neighboring regions never went the other way into Central Asia. If anything, South Indian migration went the other way towards the Malay peninsula. So that's their take on the whole enchilada.
As for true history, even a South India...
indc saysNow you are saying that buddhism is owned by outsiders.
Or you mean buddhist outsiders attacked india back even though they are buddhists?
Do you even know that most of India was buddhist at one time
Nope, the only "owners" are Zoroastrians because that's central to the identity of the Persian Empire.
Buddhism can exist anywhere and yes, I know about Ashoka in India though the Parsi guy says that he's also a Persian descended conqueror of India. So there you have it, even without the British, you have racist theories within your own borders.
.
The first picture you shared is from actress in bengal close to bangladesh.
Second picture is of a tamilian actress who later started working in bollywood. Stop commenting on things you dont even understand.
Is your friend from chennai a rice bag convert.
« First « Previous Comments 71 - 87 of 87 Search these comments
https://news.yahoo.com/youtube-ban-hateful-supremacist-videos-170733974.html
So if you make a video about veterans deserving superior treatment, that's hateful? Or elderly people?
Of course, I'll be shocked if they don't pull all the Praeger U. videos while leaving up the "Men should be castrated" "Whiteness is Toxic" and "Anti-Termite" videos will remain.
Regulators, mount up!