Recent Published and Peer Reviewed Global Warming Study Discredited After Reading Only One Page
invite response
2018 Nov 14, 8:43am 949 views 1 comment
Comments 1 - 1 of 1 Search these comments
1
Evan F.
2018 Nov 14, 10:09am
It looks like the scientists used a new/different way of measuring ocean temperatures:
...calculated heat based on the amount of oxygen and carbon dioxide rising off the ocean, filling round glass flasks with air collected at research stations around the globe.
Doesn't really seem like an ideal way to gather data, but maybe with a LOT of measurements you'd arrive at something usable. The article doesn't say how many measurements they took, so who knows .
...calculated heat based on the amount of oxygen and carbon dioxide rising off the ocean, filling round glass flasks with air collected at research stations around the globe.
Doesn't really seem like an ideal way to gather data, but maybe with a LOT of measurements you'd arrive at something usable. The article doesn't say how many measurements they took, so who knows .
Now I'm no scientist, but when you have an error margin of 70% what possible relevance can the study have?
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/environment/sd-me-climate-study-error-20181113-story.html