by lostand confused ➕follow (3) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 49 - 57 of 57 Search these comments
Sniper saysCan you please explain how you know this inside information from Mueller,. I'm curious where the details of these investigations leaked out. I haven't read the details
Again-let's not make the post about me.
Sniper saysPlease list what those 4 indictments are and how they are directly related to Trump's 2016 campaign.
No actually you asked:
Sniper says
Sorry, I don't know how these indictments show Russian collusion, that's why I asked for those details.
You're claiming some inside knowledge about details of the investigation, that's why I asked you to clarify them. Who else should I ask? Stop being so sensitive or don't make claims that people ask you to verify
Isn't Mueller's investigation about looking for Russian collusion in the past elections? Didn't Trump run in the elections? Hasn't the overwhelming narrative been Russia helped Trump win.
Why do I always need to connect these dots?
The indictment is public.
Hint: it had NOTHING to do with Russian interference with the election, and was for events YEARS before.
what was Flynn's position with the Trump campaign? What was he indicted for?
why was Flynn's sentencing date pushed back just the other day?
Yep--and those indictments are expected to be amended with additional charges.
There you go.
anon_ce856 saysIs it possible to get links from neutral sources that DON'T have severe TDS?
No because TDS isn't a real thing and there will never be a definition of what it is supposed to be.
No because TDS isn't a real thing and there will never be a definition of what it is supposed to be.
« First « Previous Comments 49 - 57 of 57 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,198,908 comments by 14,157 users - roggog online now