by lostand confused ➕follow (3) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 18 - 57 of 57 Search these comments
She acknowledges that the FBI and DOJ were doing their jobs and investigating criminal behavior.
Then you must hate Hilalry Clinton and Obama.
Who gutted Glass Steagal .
Who signed NAFTA and pushed heavily for free trade.
Who came and lied multiple times that if you like your doctor/plan you can keep it.
Which traitor colluded with the Russians toi subvert democracy in our country.
Obozo the lying clown ran against NSA and free trade-what did he do in office-spy on an opposing candidate-and you still support the treasonous dog.
LOL Obama did not spy on anyone-LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHy don't you post some facts on your claim on !%
What criminal behavior would that be?
Pretty sure Obama was never slinking around in a trench coat surreptitiously watching anyone during his term.
Money Laundering, fraud, working as a foreign agent.
Don't worry, it will likely all come out when Mueller announces his findings.
anon_a1631 says
What criminal behavior would that be?
Money Laundering, fraud, working as a foreign agent.
Don't worry, it will likely all come out when Mueller announces his findings.
As for your sources-that is typical MSM
I come out better and now way am I 1% . I don't think I am even 10%
They don't want Presidents that use the office to enrich themselves and their family.
It must be nice when one can simply dismiss anything that is counter to ones viewpoint as MSM. There are no facts. No truth. Only what one chooses to believe, right?
Yep--Trump made it so most people do have small gains. But the vast majority of the borrowed money is going to the 1%.
The only problem is if that borrowed money ever gets repaid--then that small gain you got will look miniscule compared to the bill you get.
That sounds awesome, let me get my popcorn, I can hardly wait for those facts.
Yep--Trump made it so most people do have small gains. But the vast majority of the borrowed money is going to the 1%.
The only problem is if that borrowed money ever gets repaid--then that small gain you got will look miniscule compared to the bill you get.
borrowed money
It must be nice when one can simply dismiss anything that is counter to ones viewpoint as MSM. There are no facts. No truth. Only what one chooses to believe, right?
But the vast majority of the borrowed money is going to the 1%.
The only problem is if that borrowed money ever gets repaid--then that small gain you got will look miniscule compared to the bill you get.
Sniper says
That sounds awesome, let me get my popcorn, I can hardly wait for those facts.
You probably have a bit of time. Mueller is still doing interviews gathering evidence.
Sniper says
That sounds awesome, let me get my popcorn, I can hardly wait for those facts.
You probably have a bit of time. Mueller is still doing interviews gathering evidence.
Yes, those 17 intelligence agencies with access to EVERY piece of evidence just need a little bit more time to find....... nothing...
Sniper saysYes, those 17 intelligence agencies with access to EVERY piece of evidence just need a little bit more time to find....... nothing...
If nothing = 4 indictments and counting...
The broken record again.
Please list what those 4 indictments are and how they are directly related to Trump's 2016 campaign.
I'll be waiting.
One typically doesn't lie to an investigator unless he/she has something to hide...
That’s not how it works. When the FBI questions a suspect, they already know all the facts. What they are looking for is either the suspect to incriminate himself or state something that disagrees with their list of facts. This could be a wrong date or time or any sort of thing deemed material to the case. Then BLAM! They’ve got the guy cold on “Lying to the FBI” which is a felony.
lol--we're not talking about the FBI asking what he had for breakfast 3 months ago. These guys knowingly lied to hide incriminating meetings, evidence, statements that they didn't think the FBI already knew. Unfortunately for them, the investigators did their jobs and proved them to be liars.
Sniper says
Please list what those 4 indictments are and how they are directly related to Trump's 2016 campaign.
If it's a broken record, then I'm sure you already know. One typically doesn't lie to an investigator unless he/she has something to hide...
... fucking Trump is proven to be insulting your intelligence 5 or 6 times a day by lying to your face AND STILL YOU TALK ABOUTjazz_music says
Hillary Hillary Hillary, Obama, Obama, Obama,
... fucking Trump is proven to be insulting your intelligence 5 or 6 times a day by lying to your face AND STILL YOU TALK ABOUT
Hillary Hillary Hillary, Obama, Obama, Obama,
WHAT A BUNCH OF PUSSIES!!!!!
Consider George Papadopoulos. The special counsel secured his guilty plea not for improper contact with the Russians but for lying about that contact to the FBI. Consider Michael Flynn. He too pled guilty not to unlawful contact with Russians but to lying to the FBI about that contact. ”
Oh please Hillary used bleach bit, actually broke her phones with a hammer , destroyed ehr emails after a congressional subpeona-the fBI did what-lOL!
These guys knowingly lied to hide incriminating meetings, evidence, statements that they didn't think the FBI already knew. Unfortunately for them, the investigators did their jobs and proved them to be liars.
Sniper saysThe broken record again.
Please list what those 4 indictments are and how they are directly related to Trump's 2016 campaign.
I'll be waiting.
If it's a broken record, then I'm sure you already know.
Is there any way to have a conversation about Trump without mentioning Hillary? Just wondering.
No, because in our election system, it was basically Hillary the Wonderful Progressive Totally Not A Hint of Corruption vs. Trump. There were two choices, and contrasting with the losing candidate who was the only viable alternative is perfectly reasonable.
Can you please explain how you know this inside information from Mueller,. I'm curious where the details of these investigations leaked out. I haven't read the details
Please list what those 4 indictments are and how they are directly related to Trump's 2016 campaign.
Sorry, I don't know how these indictments show Russian collusion, that's why I asked for those details.
Sniper saysCan you please explain how you know this inside information from Mueller,. I'm curious where the details of these investigations leaked out. I haven't read the details
Again-let's not make the post about me.
Sniper saysPlease list what those 4 indictments are and how they are directly related to Trump's 2016 campaign.
No actually you asked:
Sniper says
Sorry, I don't know how these indictments show Russian collusion, that's why I asked for those details.
You're claiming some inside knowledge about details of the investigation, that's why I asked you to clarify them. Who else should I ask? Stop being so sensitive or don't make claims that people ask you to verify
Isn't Mueller's investigation about looking for Russian collusion in the past elections? Didn't Trump run in the elections? Hasn't the overwhelming narrative been Russia helped Trump win.
Why do I always need to connect these dots?
The indictment is public.
Hint: it had NOTHING to do with Russian interference with the election, and was for events YEARS before.
what was Flynn's position with the Trump campaign? What was he indicted for?
why was Flynn's sentencing date pushed back just the other day?
Yep--and those indictments are expected to be amended with additional charges.
There you go.
anon_ce856 saysIs it possible to get links from neutral sources that DON'T have severe TDS?
No because TDS isn't a real thing and there will never be a definition of what it is supposed to be.
No because TDS isn't a real thing and there will never be a definition of what it is supposed to be.
« First « Previous Comments 18 - 57 of 57 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,194,326 comments by 13,889 users - anniecoyote online now