patrick.net

Looks more like a right-wing dweeb trying to equate homosexuality with incest.

If some one asked me that I would have responded, "Have you stopped fucking your sister yet?".

The interviewer is a troll making straw man arguments. The first guy interviewed is 100% right. It does not matter what you or I think about the private lives of two consenting adults, no matter how disgusted you are by their actions. I find the thought of old people having sex disgusting. That does not mean it should be illegal for a married couple to have sex on their 50th anniversary. If two adults want to engage in incest and they are not producing retarded children, then it's none of your or my business. Just because you have a taboo against a practice does not mean you have the right to use violence or have others use violence on your behalf to prevent that practice.

Furthermore, Christians don't say they are weirded out about gay sex and gay marriage. If that was it, there would be no problem. Christians call gays an abomination and have jailed, tortured, murdered, even burned at the stake homosexuals. Big fucking difference. They also oppose same sex marriage as a legal institution which is far more like the laws prohibiting interracial marriage than laws dealing with incest.

Finally, since sex has nothing to do with the legal institution of marriage, it should be legal to marry a blood relative. Here's a perfect example of why it would be unjust to disallow this. A twenty year old U.S. marine is going off to war, but he's financially responsible for his disabled sister after their parents died. The U.S. marine marries his sister -- a completely Platonic marriage -- in order to make sure she's on his insurance and if anything happens to him at war, she'll get his survivor benefits. He dies in the war throwing himself on a grenade to save a dozen fellow soldiers. Are you really going to tell me that his disabled sister should not get his survivor benefits because you don't want to recognize their marriage? You'd have to be a real ass to do that.

Secular marriage is a financial dependency arrangement. It has nothing to do with sex.

Also, the troll's conclusion is baseless and wrong. Each person said the same thing, essentially that if children aren't created, then the hypothetical couple is doing no harm and violating no persons rights, so in a free country, they should be allowed to do what they want regardless of what feelings you or I experience. That's America, bitch.

Ironbrain believes vice is nice but incest is best and he's one of patnet's resident right wingnuts.

With google's 53 flavors of fucking, it's only a matter of time before taking on a wooly mammoth will be considered a conservational effort...

Obligatory:

Dan8267 says

That's the really sad part.

No, the REALLY sad part is that a patnet contributor thinks this moronic video "proves" anything.

Ah, but it does prove something. It proves that conservatives aren't good thinkers.

Ironman says

bob2356 says

Ironbrain believes vice is nice but incest is best and he's one of patnet's resident right wingnuts.

Hey Bullshit Bobby, when you're fucking your cows in the barn, do you consider them to be "family"?

and of course we can't forget ironbrain's obligatory daily animal sex fantasy.

Imaginary lovers
Never turn you down
When all the others turn you away
They're around
It's my private pleasure
Midnight fantasy
Someone to share my
Wildest dreams with me
Imaginary lover you're mine anytime
Imaginary lovers, oh yeah

They asked the same people that the Liberals has conditioned to Normalize every Societal Ill to be accepted less you be labeled some new brand of bigot.
I don't get why you guys are getting butt cheese out of it.