« prev   random   next »

0
1

The new trump campaign.

By bob2356 following x   2016 Aug 18, 10:31pm 3,711 views   7 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    


So now we have Trump, Breitbart Bannon, and former Fox Ailes. Wow. America has hit the make shit up trifecta. Can anyone explain the strategy here? Did Trump somehow feel he was missing out on the low wattage rabid trumpbot voters like ironbrain and tenpoundass? He needed to lock that voter segment in better somehow? On the plus side Ailes will have the women voters flocking. The minus side is they will be flocking to Hillary. Bannon will really get the minority vote moving. To the Hillary column. Is there any logic at all here?

I was willing to vote Trump to block Hillary, but this is getting past max weird. Write in vote for donald duck I guess.

#trump

1   neplusultra57   ignore (0)   2016 Aug 18, 10:36pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Glenn Beck, of all people, said tonight on CNN that Drumpf wants to start a news channel in the aftermath of deliberately losing the election. Not bad, considering how warped Beck is, to speculate that Drumpf, who stood up on world television and talked about the size of his cock, is just trying to salt the plot and fleece the didiots that like that sort of thing. Maybe he'd finally make some real money beyond the silver spoon he was born with.

2   neplusultra57   ignore (0)   2016 Aug 18, 10:45pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

For fuck's sake, bob, I haven't heard you say it, but would you really vaporize the SCOTUS noms for the sake of blocking the Scarlet Whore?

3   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   ignore (2)   2016 Aug 19, 6:32am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

It's been pretty quiet on the wacko front this week. There must be a lot of pent up crazy building inside trump.

4   anonymous   ignore (null)   2016 Aug 19, 6:50am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

For fuck's sake, bob, I haven't heard you say it, but would you really vaporize the SCOTUS noms for the sake of blocking the Scarlet Whore?

-----------

I'm curious how you reason that Hillary would be better for picking SCROTUS seats vs Trump

5   neplusultra57   ignore (0)   2016 Aug 19, 8:09am   ↑ like (5)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

errc says

I'm curious how you reason that Hillary would be better for picking SCROTUS seats vs Trump

You'll get a kick outta this: I read Trump's published SCOTUS list and I read the published Clinton/Democratic Party platform. Crazy, huh? Yeah, I know! If you're determined to disbelieve everything as just another Illuminati plot then you might as well write in your neighbor's dog in November. Meanwhile, back in the actual world Citizens United remains unchallenged by every SCOTUS clown named by the Orange Blowfish Trust Fund Twit, but the Scarlet Whore mentions it specifically.....every now and then. And, as I said to Dan earlier, if you think Clinton (generally considered a woman if only by medical consensus) will pick any SCOTUS judge who will even entertain rescinding Roe V. Wade, well, then it's back to the Illuminati and your neighbor's dog. Obamacare is a watershed issue for you, so the Whore already has a stake through her heart.

6   bob2356   ignore (4)   2016 Aug 20, 9:51pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Ironman says

bob2356 says

Is there any logic at all here?

In your case, absolutely not.

How would you know anything about logic? Your logic skills are considerably weaker than your non existent math skills.

7   HydroCabron   ignore (1)   2016 Aug 20, 9:58pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

errc says

I'm curious how you reason that Hillary would be better for picking SCROTUS seats vs Trump

LOL!

Go ahead and write in your neighbor's dog.


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions