2
0

Interesting explanation for Germany's open borders


 invite response                
2016 Jan 8, 4:34pm   7,942 views  11 comments

by resistance   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

from http://takimag.com/article/forecasting_a_million_muslim_mob_steve_sailer/ :

Raspail missed key aspects of what happened in 2015. He imagined that the refugees would be starving masses who overcame European resistance by their pitifulness. But instead, the invaders turned out to be strutting military-age youths with smartphones, giving Germany’s surrender a weird sexual vibe that nobody yet has explained satisfactorily even in retrospect.

and a reply at http://www.unz.com/isteve/forecasting-a-million-muslim-mob-sailer-on-tetlocks-superforecasting/#comment-1284375

Werner says:January 6, 2016 at 6:02 am GMT • 200 Words

strutting military-age youths with smartphones, giving Germany’s surrender a weird sexual vibe that nobody yet has explained satisfactorily even in retrospect.

Is it really that hard to explain?

The sexual appeal of strutting military age young men would be to whom? To women, both young and old. If the appeal is sexual it can’t be to anyone else. It is to women.

Does that mean an invasion of these Muslims is appealing to women? The smart answer seems to be No. But if the sexual appeal is not to women, then there is no sexual appeal, but we know and we feel there is a sexual appeal. Therefore the correct answer has to be YES. And the smart answer has to be wrong.

The sexy men are invading because the women want it.

And it’s stupid but it’s not false.

When men make a mistake, they invade somewhere they should not have–due to male desires blinding their reason.

When women make a mistake, they invite someone they should not have–due to female desires blinding their reason.

The reason we have not yet seen an explanation is that we assume politics are based on male desires. And second, women do not understand their own desires, so they would be less able to articulate this than I am. What woman would say, “I know it is stupid, but I need to see if these sexy, strong foreigners might make better lovers and rulers.”

But that’s the answer.

Comments 1 - 11 of 11        Search these comments

1   curious2   2016 Jan 8, 5:09pm  

DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says

German guys

are also just as interested in keeping their heads attached to their shoulders, and are more likely to be decapitated than the females.

The correct explanation is that German corporations are looking for cheap labor, and NATO politicians are looking for Saudi money (both directly and via the military industrial complex). They manufacture consent via the media.

People don't need water with carbon dioxide and sugar and food coloring, and have no natural interest in that junk, but people buy it.

The OP "interesting explanation" isn't a real explanation, it's an illusion of understanding, or rather a projection, like Patrick's caricatures of the three Abrahamic religions.

2   curious2   2016 Jan 8, 5:18pm  

DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says

My explanation is much more reasonable!

Maybe the truth is somewhere in between, like a Terminator movie. Corporations have become self-aware, and are importing terrorists to hasten the inevitable battle to destroy all the humans.

3   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Jan 8, 5:44pm  

I don't think Patrick's theory explains the fundamental cause, but I do think there might be at least a grain of truth to it as to why a large minority of woman and quite a few weakish looking men are very much in favor of it.

Thought you all might be shocked at this picture. When gay dudes retweet this pic with "Holy shit, she is like 'can't wait till my husband eats his beansprouts and falls asleep, hehehe!" - you know something is up.

Hard to imagine why German women might want to welcome migrants into their homes pic.twitter.com/92MYCTbEqM

— Milo Yiannopoulos (@Nero) January 4, 2016

Originally from UNHCR/German Group "Refugees Welcome".

Also this pic from the UK:

4   curious2   2016 Jan 8, 5:53pm  

thunderlips11 says

this pic

Dunno about that pic, and you seem to have changed your caption for it since you first posted it, but Islam prohibits the bearded guy from having a three-way with the other two. His fellow peaceful Muslims would cut off his head while shouting "aloha snackbar" over and over again.

5   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Jan 8, 5:56pm  

curious2 says

Dunno about that pic, and you seem to have changed your caption for it since you first posted it, but the bearded guy isn't allowed to have a three-way with the other two. His fellow peaceful Muslims would cut off his head while shouting "aloha snackbar" over and over again.

I'm still trying to find that quote, which I paraphrased. I saw this pic a while back and it took me a while to find it, but I didn't find the exact tweet.

Original pic was too unfocused, brought in something bigger, just like the German lady on the couch wanted. And for all we know, the dude too.

6   Ceffer   2016 Jan 8, 6:01pm  

The Germans are greeting the refugees with open butt cheeks.

7   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Jan 8, 6:10pm  

Ceffer says

The Germans are greeting the refugees with open butt cheeks.

And that's just the men.

Absolutely Obligatory

www.youtube.com/embed/z9NBgCxNxCc

Ride the Mustache! (Beard?!)

8   Patrick   2016 Jan 8, 11:06pm  

ever heard of "let's you and him fight"? gut feel is that is exactly what's going on in german female subconscious thoughts:

"you german pansies do not do anysink to get my panties wet
you musselman head choppers are so, so bad! ooohhhh poor refugeez! vee must let ALL of them in, right now hans or you are musselmanophobic!
which would win in a fight? i'll fuck the winner! fight now for me!"

http://www.ericberne.com/games-people-play/lets-you-and-him-fight/

9   Dan8267   2016 Jan 8, 11:26pm  


ever heard of "let's you and him fight"?

Elephant females do this too.

www.youtube.com/embed/ODy3CiS7H4o

10   curious2   2016 Jan 8, 11:30pm  


fight now for me!"

That wouldn't explain why so many of the identitarian left males agree.

Again, Ron Unz is not a credible source. He projects an illusion of understanding in an oxymoronic "movement conservative" (in this case anti-feminist) direction. I don't know why you fall for those guys, maybe you have a crush on them. (JK about the crush, but you do seem to fall for their illusions, which are intended to fool you.)

The only explanation so far that fits all the facts is along the lines described above by me and here and here by thunderlips11: corporate financial interests and their elite leaders want cheap labor, higher military spending, and more surveillance; they use their official mouthpieces to declare the official doctrine, which ambitious team players and would-be-elitists adopt as their own.

Dan8267 says

Elephant females do this too.

Similar, but with at least one crucial difference: elephant males don't welcome competition from outside males, let alone subsidize it with gifts of food and shelter.

11   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Jan 9, 9:53am  


which would win in a fight? i'll fuck the winner! fight now for me!"
www.youtube.com/embed/WO2q1iQX2UA

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions