0
0

MediCal patients with cancer not as likely to survive


 invite response                
2015 Nov 16, 9:47pm   1,242 views  4 comments

by tovarichpeter   ➕follow (6)   💰tip   ignore  

http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article45080877.html

Medicaid insurance status to worse cancer outcomes, the UC Davis study appears to be the first to examine the impact of various kinds of health insurance across more than one kind of cancer. Understanding how well Medicaid (called Medi-Cal in California) serves cancer patients is crucial, experts say, because as much as 10 percent of Californias Medicaid expenditures go to cancer care. And Medi-Cal has grown to cover more than 12 million Californians nearly a third of the states population.

Comments 1 - 4 of 4        Search these comments

1   curious2   2015 Nov 17, 1:06am  

"Thanks, Obamacare!"

2   Tenpoundbass   2015 Nov 17, 6:27am  

Plus all of the early detection cancer screening, which until Obama fixed the Healthcare system. Has been pushed out until Cancer is most likely to have already ravished your body.
You know until 2008, I was begining to think we beat cancer, and 90% of that was because of our relentless early screening. Now that screenings have been either done away with or pushed out for another decade. Now it seems everyone I know in the last 6 years that got cancer died.

Thanks Liberals!

3   elliemae   2015 Nov 17, 8:23am  

Tenpoundbass says

You know until 2008, I was begining to think we beat cancer, and 90% of that was because of our relentless early screening.

Perhaps blaming Obama makes you feel better, but we were nowhere near "beating" cancer in 2008. Medicaid (Medi-Cal to Cali's) is provided to the poorest patients, but there are many issues regarding finding a provider and then having treatments authorized. Not to mention that the working poor often aren't' able to access healthcare because they aren't able to get off work or find transportation for treatment.

Even people who aren't Medicaid recipients have difficulty with accessing treatment. If there is no willing (or able) caregiver, some centers won't provide treatments because there won't be a positive outcome. I've seen many people die because they couldn't access healthcare due to issues such as these.

Obama was nowhere around.

By the way, here's an interesting read:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/15/us/politics/many-say-high-deductibles-make-their-health-law-insurance-all-but-useless.html?ref=topics&_r=0

You can blame obamacare for not paying attention to out-of-pocket costs. That'll give you something to do.

4   Tenpoundbass   2015 Nov 17, 8:28am  

elliemae says

Perhaps blaming Obama makes you feel better, but we were nowhere near "beating" cancer in 2008.

I didn't say we beat it, but more people were being detected early enough to change the outcome.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions