patrick.net

dodgerfanjohn says

It's basically futile to argue how damaging Islamists have been to the western world.

The guy is a brainwashed buffoon.....not to mention the anti-Hindu bias since you know who kicked them out of India.

Ever wonder why Nigerians, Indian non-muslims and Chinese prefer to come to the US while Pakistanis prefer Britain?

http://www.gallup.com/poll/161435/100-million-worldwide-dream-life.aspx

Furthermore they are so racist in the media there that they try to lump Pakistani gangbangers with hindus, sikhs and east asians with inflammatory titles. That's why

http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/561997/Asian-gangs-were-allowed-to-prey-on-vulnerable-girls

Article written by muslim apologist in UK who lacks knowledge of her Qur'an

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/sep/30/abuse-children-asian-communities

lostand confused says

Nobody is saying kill all muslims-except you of course . Straight out of the feminazi playbook of political correctness.

Really, so how do you take the comment below? And I'm neither a feminist nor a nazi. I am an individual who knows a lot of Muslims, and as such, I don't appreciate people throwing around comments like the one quoted. But hey, you seem happy to ignore it and say I am simply making it up.

reggie says

It's not discrimination to kill or deport anyone who practices Islam or Sharia law outside of the Middle East, because that is exactly what they want to do to you if you are not one of them while they are in your country.

MMR says

dodgerfanjohn says

It's basically futile to argue how damaging Islamists have been to the western world.

The guy is a brainwashed buffoon.....not to mention the anti-Hindu bias since you know who kicked them out of India.

I'd say it's your comments that make you the buffoon. And care to share my anti-Hindu bias? I asked why you were posting nothing but stuff on attacks in India when we were discussing Europe. How does that translate as anti-Hindu bias in your mind?

dodgerfanjohn says

You have to understand you are arguing with a Brit. The BBC media has had an anti Jew bias for the past couple decades and as a result has put forth a pro Palestinian and pro Muslim propaganda line that has brainwashed a large number of Brits over the past 2-3 decades. It's basically futile to argue how damaging Islamists have been to the western world.

Oh my, an expert on everyone from the UK, and the BBC as well. How fascinating. And perhaps you could elaborate on how damaging Islamists have been to the Western world over the centuries. You know, the world wars they started, the financial crises they instigated, the mass unemployment, the poverty.... The impact of Islamists on the West has been negligible. You couldn't exactly say the same about the impact of the West on the Middle East though, could you? But of course, that doesn't fit with your narrative.

Bigsby says

lostand confused says

Nobody is saying kill all muslims-except you of course . Straight out of the feminazi playbook of political correctness.

Really, so how do you take the comment below? And I'm neither a feminist nor a nazi. I am an individual who knows a lot of Muslims, and as such, I don't appreciate people throwing around comments like the one quoted. But hey, you seem happy to ignore it and say I am simply making it up.

reggie says

It's not discrimination to kill or deport anyone who practices Islam or Sharia law outside of the Middle East,

Read that statement again Bigs. If a Muslim kills someone for insulting his Prophet, he is practicing the sharia laws, which would be murder/terrorism. Yes, he should be executed, just as a gang member from East LA killing someone in a random shooting should be executed, because I believe in the death penalty.

Strategist says

Read that statement again Bigs. If a Muslim kills someone for insulting his Prophet, he is practicing the sharia laws, which would be murder/terrorism. Yes, he should be executed, just as a gang member from East LA killing someone in a random shooting should be executed, because I believe in the death penalty.

I don't need to read the statement again. Your point is irrelevant to what he said (not to mention decidedly muddled) - you simply need to read the first line he wrote. It was an abhorrent comment, so you shouldn't waste your time trying to defend it.

just because a small group of Jews successfully kicked the shit out of multiple middle eastern Islamic nations(at the same time no less) doesn't mean the Islamists weren't the aggressors.

That's quite the selective memory you've got there Bigsby. And with that ....ignoring invasions of Israel for literally NO VALID REASON, I'll again assert you are a product BBC propaganda.

Integration of African Americans in America was obviously an excellent policy and a humanitarian decision and so the right thing to do. But Europe and other nations should be allowed to question whether integration of Muslims (a clear percentage of whom are both violent and opposed to basic human rights) is categorically different for these reasons: www.reddit.com/​r/​PoliticalDiscussion/​comments/​3k3wdg/​i_​keep_​hearing_​muslims_​want_​to_​force_​their/​

Integrating Islam into the West is like integrating single white middle aged men with beards who drive vans into high schools. Sure, not every one of those guys is a problem. But when we crunch numbers, there's clearly a problem. I respect numbers and I respect people. Nations need to fix the Islamic terrorist problem and human rights violations where they arise, not shuffle middle-age Islamic men around the world in some disillusioned hope this magically makes the world more diverse.

Cool people can be anywhere. That's the ticket. African Americans post-slavery and mid-oppression, amazingly cool people on the balance. By contrast, Islam is not producing a high percentage of cool people like America accomplished WITH African Americans in the 20th century. Integration is not some golden recipe that works everywhere at all times. I've learned this in nature.

If there were some super advanced eco-society today, the worst thing for them would be to integrate with modern America that loves, on the balance percentage-wise, plastic and gasoline and pharma-blah and other toxic terribles. Integration is not some golden recipe for diversity. Sometimes it works against diversity. We see this in nature constantly.

I'm not trying to pick on Islam either. I think the same thing about Roman Catholic priests -- a certain percentage of them clearly have predator problems according to statistics. Its dangerous to integrate 'celibate' priests into a culture (like a school) that not only lacks safeguards against predators, but gives them places to hide and also monetary handouts.

DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says

Scratch out 'negro' and replace with 'muslim' and scratch out '3/5ths a man' and replace with 'game'

I'm still waiting for those 3/5 negro suicide bombers. Man, those were the daysDieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says

Then, anyone with a hunting license could help manage the muslim threat.

or you could just beat them to that gatling cannon you were talking about Bolton. If you don't get your hands on it before they do...you won't live to see the apocalypse

why shoot them; why not continue to push for gun control and simply not let them in? Most of these guys won't even add anything to the economy anyway

Bigsby says

You know, the world wars they started, the financial crises they instigated, the mass unemployment, the poverty.

Exactly, the BBC anti-Jew bias...you actually proved his point. On another note, why does the BBC lump pakistani gangbangers in with Hindus, Sikhs and Chinese by calling them 'Asian Gangs' and Asian 'pedo rings' when they are actually Pakistani pedo rings

Of course the only notable prosecutions that happened in the financial crises were Indians who were hung out to dry by their Jewish bosses.