patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,204,867 comments by 14,316 users - Ceffer, Patrick, RC2006 online now
Allowing pets in Rentals, what major problems are there?
invite response
2012 Sep 24, 9:42am 34,540 views 87 comments
« First « Previous Comments 83 - 87 of 87 Search these comments
Before people started getting abusive and discussing one off situations, it seems that allowing pets isn't terrible. What I would call "cheap" damage is that around doors where they might scrape things. That isn't horrendous, and their deposit will cover that.
The carpet/flooring issues are a little troubling, but it appears that the limited supply and higher rents for these places will attract many extra good tenants, allowing for higher possible rents and at the very least, a larger pool of people to select from. Over all it is probably worth it.
I will avoid large dogs that might cause death, that could be a costly law suit, even though extremely unlikely. These places aren't suitable for large dogs anyways, so it's partially moot. But smaller pets and cats seem ok. There are decent ways to repair the damages a cat/dog might cause.
The comments regarding children doing similar underfloor damage, that was some extreme one off case. I don't think I've ever heard of anyone else making those complaints. Those are just things to deal with in life, not something to worry about. There are plenty of odd people out there, but I'm just interested in the cases I'm likely to run into.
I will avoid large dogs that might cause death
While a large dog might be inherently more dangerous due to size, strength, bigger teeth, it is really the breed and the way the dog has been socialized and trained that determines how dangerous it is. Pitbulls aren't that large, but they are probably more dangerous on average than a giant Newfoundland, a breed known as the gentle giant.
New Renter - I addressed my error in a follow-up post. If you want an apology, here it is: Sorry for misreading your post.
New Renter
2012 Sep 26, 3:39am
New Renter - I addressed my error in a follow-up post. If you want an apology, here it is: Sorry for misreading your post.
My apologies, my Latin is sorely lacking as you may have already gathered :)
New Renter
2012 Sep 28, 5:46pm
New Renter says
You still wear pants? Why?
I have a buffalo sofa and I'd chafe like hell sitting on that without some sansabelts. Sometimes I can get away with just a Kimono.
Lose the sofa, you can thank me later.
curious2
2012 Oct 24, 4:53pm
Romnesia might tie them to the roof of a car and drive off to Canada.
« First « Previous Comments 83 - 87 of 87 Search these comments
Most complexes simply deny pets. Those that allow them, often charge pet premiums which I assume is just a money grab because they know pet owners have limited choices. Then there are those that ask for larger deposits ($250-$500 per pet). Or those asking for cleaning deposits when they move out($150-300).
So far, I've let people own pets and not really worried about it. I'm renting to premium people. These units are very nice and the quality of tenant has been very strong so far.
I figure if they leave and the animal has done damage, they won't make me go through a small claims case, and if it's over their deposit amount, the $500 extra isn't going to do anything anyway because their rents are already in the $2000 range. I could see asking for $500 extra if they were renting for say $1000, but in the $2000 range, I have a decent amount held anyway.
Is there anything I am missing? Dogs could scratch up the floors or stain it with pee/crap that is left there for hours while someone is at work. Possibly redoing part of the floor. Repainting, some touch up work.
Cats spraying, that concerns me. I've never dealt with it, but I suspect it's not that easy to clean up.
I see pet owners are generally being abused by the system, so they're happy to not be screwed by someone and will actually pay slightly higher rents because of their limited choices.
Are there other reasons not to accept pets? Any major horror stories?