This is a question for all. Have we really seen the bottom in the housing market, with all the foreclosures, lack of demand??...
If people are not working, they are not buying.
Don't we have to see some stabilization in the Job market before we get stabilization in the housing market?
Has Housing Really Bottomed?
By ZMan Follow Sun, 8 Jul 2012, 2:30pm 9,709 views 135 comments
Watch (0) Share
Quote
Permalink Like Dislike « First « Previous Viewing Comments 96-135 of 135 Last » See most liked comments
|
ZMan is moderator of this thread. |
Follow
Befriend
4 threads
266 comments
Fremont, CA
I like to consider my interest in buying a house much like fishing adventures. the fish just are not biting.
Follow
Befriend (3)
13 threads
2,219 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
mell says
What do I say? I think you've been snooping around my mind!
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,539 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
Randy H says
I'm with you here. I am pretty well aware of what is going on at Apple, Google and Microsoft down in the Silicon Valley since I work at one (hardware engineer), and large numbers of my coworkers have been poached by the other two. I got a very large raise, partially as a result of a threat to go to a competitor (gotta play the game, sadly), and I know that my friends that left are getting big stock awards and bonuses from their employers. Considering all the reports about how precarious the job situation is across the nation, the competition by companies here to retain talent seems sort of absurd. I have only been out of college for 5 years though, so maybe it is always that way. It does seem like there is no shortage of engineers, just a shortage of good ones.
A number of my former coworkers that work in software also bailed for various start-ups. The one that went to Zynga 6 months ago must be pissed, based on what I have seen ZNGA's stock price do. I am still largely at a loss when I try to describe what half of the software start-ups actually DO in the valley, but the VC funds seem to be flowing anyway.
"No man, it isn't a server farm offering remote storage, it's the CLOUD SOLUTION man, totally different!"
"No man, it isn't a color balance tweaker and image storage site, it's a SOCIAL NETWORKING PATHWAY and we'll figure out how to make ad money later, totally different!"
"No man, it isn't money from spamming ads that we are after, it is INTELLIGENT TARGETED ADVERTISING WITH HIGH RELEVANCE and people will totally buy stuff once we connect them with the right products. It isn't about making money NOW, it is about making money LATER but IPOing before our awesome technology takes off! It's the new NEW PARADIGM, man!"
Follow
Befriend (5)
44 threads
4,602 comments
Los Altos, CA
Premium
The economic theoretical reason is called "wage efficiency theory"...or as I call it, "wage inefficiency theory". It comes down to inertia: companies are most rational to continue to escalate their bets on the known resources even beyond the intuitively quantitative break even point.
More to the point, contact me if you're interested in being poached. My peer who runs the infra division is more desperate than I am right now.
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
It is taking much less time for the economy to undergo paradigm shifts. If one happens to be in an ebbing industry, there is no way for his conditions to improve just by macroeconomic changes. It is increasingly important that one does just something in the right place at the right time, as opposed to doing something "right".
The world is becoming a giant casino. Or perhaps it already is... we could have been born in Somalia!
Follow
Befriend (5)
44 threads
4,602 comments
Los Altos, CA
Premium
Most eloquently described by Taleb in Fooled by Randomness. I think it's always been this way. I'm not a believer that there ever were "good old days".
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
Call it Crazy says
Uh oh.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
Call it Crazy says
"Never make predictions. Especially about the future."
You want a "factor of safety" in any major financial decision, so it's good to think of "what if" scenarios. Like "what if the economy goes tits-up?"
Call it Crazy says
If you have a wife that likes to blow cash on frivolous stuff, it might be best to do the 15 year route and have as much cash as possible "tied up" in the house. ;-)
Where do you live? Do you live in an area subject to wild RE price swings like CA?
Follow
Befriend
229 threads
2,781 comments
wthrfrk80 says
Ha ha... thank god she doesn't spend on the frivolous stuff!! But... she loves to "start" home projects that I get to "finish", that's why I bailed on the last house.... I'm getting too old to be doing this crap and be her handyman........
wthrfrk80 says
That is the BIGGEST issue.... I'm in NJ and it looks like there's going to be a big wave of foreclosures this year. You know what they will do to the property values... That's what makes me "gun shy" on buying again until it looks like this area gets close to the bottom...
We've been driving around looking at different areas and the number of "shadow houses" is enormous in Central NJ.... and the majority that are actually on MLS are short sales or foreclosures.....
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
Call it Crazy says
Solution: RENTING!
Call it Crazy says
Not only that, much of the local RE market is probably tied to the Wall Street Casino Economy, right? What happens the next time the bets go bad?
My two-cent advice: keep renting
Follow
Befriend
229 threads
2,781 comments
wthrfrk80 says
The benchmark that I've been using is to find a house that my mortgage payment is comparable to the local rent payment on a comparable house.
But, unlike many others that come here, I don't base it just on the dollars to dollars of monthly payment comparison. I also factor in and budget for repairs, upgrades and maintainance (and with my wife, I have to budget HIGH) as well as amoritize the closing costs on both sides (buying and selling) which very few factor into the equation.
If I can get those numbers to equal out, then I might consider it..
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,643 comments
Call it Crazy says
Without getting into logic of including upgrades again, that's the right way to do it. But you should also factor in the principal repayment and tax savings as well.
Not sure why you think others that come here don't include repairs and maintenance though. I think almost everyone smart enough to have found this website is also smart enough to factor in maintenance costs...
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
Call it Crazy says
It sounds like your situation is somewhat unique. Any house you might own looks like a real money pit for you.
How long will your wife tolerate renting? Are diamonds cheaper than your wife's remodeling projects? If so, buy her diamonds. At least they tend to hold their value. And you don't have to pay property taxes on them.
Follow
Befriend
229 threads
2,781 comments
wthrfrk80 says
That's my other part of my decision... if the economy goes tits-up.
I believe the economy is going to go tits-up, the question is, will it be a "A" cup, "B" cup or "DD" cup?? I don't have a crystal ball..
Then, where is the "safest" place to be when it goes tits-up... in a rental dealing with a landlord and his financial problems or in your own house dealing with a mortgage/bank?
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
Call it Crazy says
Yeah that's hard to say. Personally, I'd rather be the renter dealing with the landlord. If the economy is tanking, rents might even go down. Unlike mortgage payments.
Follow
Befriend
229 threads
2,781 comments
wthrfrk80 says
I can probally push her for another year or so on renting... it already cost me having to get her a new car to trade off on going into the rental. But if I waited another year to sell the past house, I would have lost another $30K - $40K in equity, not to mention the costs and money on more house projects... plus what I save on the rent vs. old mortgage now, the net affect, I come out ahead on the dollars..
Follow
Befriend
229 threads
2,781 comments
wthrfrk80 says
I don't think rents will go down in this area... the majority of "landlords" are actually underwater and can't sell, that's why they are renting their houses. They still need to cover their monthly nut... Plus when the foreclosures pick up this year, I think that will only make rents go up, as more people will be kicked out and will need to rent.
I find out next month what my landlord plans to do for the following year. The had originally tried to sell, but couldn't get their price, so they rented it instead. But, the house prices have fallen the past year, so I don't know if they will cut their losses and sell or continue to rent it out...... that's the part of renting that SUCKS!! not having a permanent place year after year.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
Call it Crazy says
True, but you might have to move year after year anyway. There is no job security anymore.
Follow
Befriend (3)
13 threads
2,219 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
bmwman91 says
What would you consider a "good" engineer?
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,539 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
New renter says
It's pretty subjective in my book, but here's my take.
I'd sum it up with, "you are either born with it, or you aren't." If you work in tech/engineering, you know that there are just some people that can see something once and understand it fundamentally, whereas others have to work really hard at it and may just end up memorizing facts about it rather than understanding it.
On top of that, the individual needs to possess a high level of personal interest in technical subjects and passion for learning and understanding everything around them. It's the only way to keep from stagnating and burning out in this field. If you can't have fun doing it, you probably won't last too long in engineering, which is why I assume that so many engineers go the management-route after 10-15 years.
Follow
Befriend
229 threads
2,781 comments
wthrfrk80 says
That's absolutely true... there is no security anywhere...
The other part of my calculations is to make sure we would be able to cover the mortgage payment if one of us loses their job.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
Call it Crazy says
That's a very important thing to consider, yes.
Follow
Befriend (3)
13 threads
2,219 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
wthrfrk80 says
Nah, buy with 3% down and just squat. At this point your finances are only needed to qualify.
Follow
Befriend
34 threads
2,111 comments
thomas.wong1986 says
Maybe and maybe not. Sure- I would agree that on a broad national level that might hold true. I am not totally in disagreement with you but in the case of those numbers it takes decades of result to come to a conclusion. Should potential homebuyers spend several decades waiting for those numbers to "make sense"? I spent over 12 years saving and I am every bit up there on agreeing that the cost of real estate is ridiculous in the Bay Area. I've also lived here long enough to see that despite all forms of reasonable logic, the application of historical data, and all other common sense that this area doesn't at all act predictably and is prone to wild swings up and down.
The bottom line is that everyone has to make that decision. In our case we saved, we waited, and we bought a house that we could afford and did so on a conservative basis: the overall cost is less than 1/4 of our monthly income, or about the same as what we paid in rent. Even the choice of where to live in the Bay Area can be a major point of that decision: For us the East Bay was the right choice financially. Not so much for SF or the Peninsula.
Follow
Befriend (3)
13 threads
2,219 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
bmwman91 says
Yes, that's no different than straight up science. A case of Asbergers syndrome dosen't hurt either.
Follow
Befriend (3)
13 threads
2,219 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
bmwman91 says
There must be very few "good" particle physicists then.
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,539 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
New renter says
lol...well, you do also need to have a balance of social skills too. It's hard to get things done when everyone hates working with you, although it isn't unheard of. So yeah, I sort of forgot about the social skills part! I think that I left it out because it seems sort of like a basic assumption, but I can imagine how people might see "engineer" and "socially adept" as being mutually exclusive.
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,539 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
New renter says
Scientific research is a bit different than engineering. You really can't be a particle physicist with a bachelor's in physics, whereas you can be a pretty good engineer with a BSxE degree if you have the mind and drive for it. Scientific research requires a much higher level of academic rigor than engineering, for the most part.
Follow
Befriend (5)
44 threads
4,602 comments
Los Altos, CA
Premium
Finding an engineer who doesn't always think he/she is always right about literally every topic anyone ever brings up is the hard part.
I had an experience where I had to throw one of our engineers out of a meeting because he wouldn't stop trying to argue revenue recognition rules with our accounting team. Another where one of our top engineers-turned-manager decided he could stop following SOX rules simply because he'd deduced they were "wrong".
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
Randy H says
lol. Wow, that's pretty bad yes.
Follow
Befriend
229 threads
2,781 comments
New renter says
A guy that doesn't crash the train???? :)
.
Sorry, I couldn't help myself.......
Follow
Befriend
16 threads
4,426 comments
Randy H says
yes.. they are a fun group when it comes to RevRec.. its just comedy !
Its better they dont interface with customers.. and make no promises to future products or updates .... "Only when and if available" should be the only thing they should be allowed to say.
The most extreme case im aware of ... was when an engineer ordered, approved without management knowing a ton of equipment to create their own Engineering Lab at their house.. Yes, he build a R&D LAB in his home using company funds.
Follow
Befriend
16 threads
4,426 comments
edvard2 says
They should understand the risks they are taking.. else wait. Certainly thinking that prices ALWAYS go up and never down they committed financial suicide ...
But even today, we are still ignoring that prices go down, with all this talk of RECOVERY, as if prices will swing up like a bubble.
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
It has been established that engineers have 0 EQ in general.
However, wanting to be "right" is not unique to engineers. This is the primary reason why there are bubble deniers.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
EQ?
Follow
Befriend (3)
13 threads
2,219 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
thomas.wong1986 says
So? I've knows several engineers with machine shops in their garage who used them to manufacture company products. If he's doing primarily company work at home the company SHOULD pay for the equipment.
Its a good solution for engineers with kids at home who might otherwise have to work short hours to take care of their kids.
Follow
Befriend (5)
44 threads
4,602 comments
Los Altos, CA
Premium
EQ= emotional quotient for corporate types,
EQ = equalizer for musicos and stereophiles,
EQ = EverQuest for aging gen x mmo gamerz
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
Also, for Perl...
$eq eq '0'
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
Randy H says
Got it.
As an engineer I use the term "P-factors" to describe all of the bullshit that can't be reduced to mathematics and science.
I.e. (People, Perception, and Political) factors.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
Example: "yeah, everything works fine in our company, save for the goddam p-factors."