Compare Realtors' Commissions and Rankings at LessThan6Percent.com (Advertisement)

So how did Romney make his huge fortune?


By American in Japan   Follow   Mon, 3 Sep 2012, 4:01am   11,112 views   95 comments
Watch (0)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

I am bringing this up, since I hear many Americans (not in Japan, though) saying how Romney is an entrepreneur who has created many jobs for Americans...

I have done just a bit of research, but I am not convinced that this is true.

This is how Romney actually made all his money (Businessinsider)

Tally of Job Creation By Bain Proves Vexing (Wall Street Journal)

Assets offshore hint at larger Romney wealth (Japantoday.com)

Election-2012/Mitt Romney--Did he-create 100 thousand jobs or kill 7 thousand (Rightwingnews.com)

Bain Capital is Romney's corporation founded in 1983. It is one of the top-leveraged buyout firms in the US.

Staples - Sevenfold return on investment for Bain Capital.

Accuride - a leveraged buyout by Bain Capital

Damon Corp.: "Under Romney, one of Bain Capital's more questionable deals was the firm's 1989 purchase of Damon, a medical testing company that ended up pleading guilty to defrauding the government and paying a $119 million fine. Although he sat on the company's board, Romney was never implicated, and Bain tripled its investment returns before selling the company in 1993. Romney personally got $473,000 from the deal, according to the Boston Globe." (Businessinsider)

Experian - a "flip" of a different kind...

DDI Corp. acquired by Bain Capital's in 2000... (A fail here as DDI later filed for bankruptcy protection and laid off 2,100 workers in 2003)

I quote: "The first indication the 100,000 jobs created number’s dodgy is that when Mitt ran against Ted Kennedy in 1994..." (Rightwingnews.com)

"$1.7 trillion was spent by Private Equity on leveraged buyouts. Private Equity companies rolled up a total of a trillion in debt making these purchases." (Alternet.org)

Politics after-mitt-romney-deal-company-showed-profits-and-then-layoffs (NY Times)

These Americans are training the Chinese workers who will replace them. (Businessinsider.com)

The sources vary along political persuasion. sources.

Note- I have no problem with people making millions, while truly creating wealth and jobs for Americans in the process.

« First     « Previous     Viewing Comments 56-95 of 95     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    56   3:18am Sun 26 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=ST+Major+Holders

    Bain Capital Investors, LLC - 89,626,932 shares - 51.48%
    (unless I am reading this wrong)

  2. Honest Abe


    Follow
    Befriend (41)
    91 threads
    1,806 comments

    57   7:19am Sun 26 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    Government doesn't "create" jobs. It hampers job creation with laws, rules, regulations, statuates, procedures, codes and other oppressive, abusive and needless red tape created and administered by busy bodies and nincompoops.

    Common sense, yes. Oppressive and abusive government micro-management, no.

  3. bob2356


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 threads
    2,497 comments

    58   9:46am Sun 26 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    Honest Abe says

    Government doesn't "create" jobs. It hampers job creation with laws, rules, regulations, statuates, procedures, codes and other oppressive, abusive and needless red tape created and administered by busy bodies and nincompoops.

    Common sense, yes. Oppressive and abusive government micro-management, no.

    I've always been curious, where does oppressive and abusive government micro-management start for you? What level of laws, rules, etc. if any are necessary in your judgement or is total anarchy the ideal state? We let the financial industry free of many long standing (oppressive, abusive, red tape) rules and it resulted in one of the worst economic crashes in American history. Should we eliminate all of the rules on the financial industry and see how it works out?

    I fully expect another blast of am radio platitudes, but one can always hope for a reasoned answer.

  4. freak80


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    52 threads
    4,416 comments
    Corning, NY
    Premium

    59   7:23am Mon 27 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    bob2356 says

    I fully expect another blast of am radio platitudes

    The ignore feature is great for tuning out the Rushbots.

  5. Nobody


    Follow
    Befriend
    10 threads
    274 comments
    San Jose, CA

    60   11:26am Mon 27 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    thomaswong.1986 says

    No I am a WHITE Native Californian

    Wong,

    You claim you are a CPA and an investor, now you are claiming to be a white man. Your bullshit never stops, does it? Your comments are proving that you are an idiot and Chinese. That's enough proof to me.

    Oh, and are you even aware of the history? The government did start the jobs in Silicon Valley. And don't forget it was US government who put the GPS satellite. If you say GPS didn't create jobs, you just promoted yourself to idiot from imbecile.

  6. freak80


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    52 threads
    4,416 comments
    Corning, NY
    Premium

    61   11:32am Mon 27 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Gubmint is always bad. We should go back to the Antebellum South where a few wealthy plantation owners controlled everything. ;-)

  7. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    62   6:55pm Thu 30 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    A little government help?
    The Federal bailout that saved Mitt Romney (Rollingstone.com)

    Looks like Romney needed the government far more than the ave. American.

  8. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    15 threads
    2,839 comments

    63   7:07pm Thu 30 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (2)  

    Nobody says

    Your comments are proving that you are an idiot and Chinese.

    what does my log on name have to do with my identity ?
    especially coming from someone else who calls himself "Nobody"...
    At least you could have been more creative using "Noah Body"

    No! The govt doesnt make anything, they are a customer for many products
    that private industries design and create with specific govt "performance" requirements.

  9. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    15 threads
    2,839 comments

    64   7:53pm Thu 30 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (3)  

    American in Japan says

    The Federal bailout that saved Mitt Romney (Rollingstone.com)

    Bain and Company or Bain Capital was bailed out? Or was it Bank of New England?

    If it was BoNE isnt that what the FDIC is supposed to do anyway ?
    Its whole purpose to ensure deposits...read some of the comments in the discussions portion of the page.

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-federal-bailout-that-saved-mitt-romney-20120829#disqus_thread

  10. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    65   2:26am Sat 1 Sep 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I quote:
    "The first thing they did was cutting cost by laying off workers. Then the 2nd thing what they did was to start selling all machinery, and the last thing they did was selling the walls of plant. Once all these were all completed, then they took profit before filing bankruptcy. This is how Romney accumulated his wealth. He is not a job creator for 12 million Americans. Be aware..." --Globalwatcher

    The question remains: job destroyer or job creator?

  11. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    15 threads
    2,839 comments

    66   2:53am Sat 1 Sep 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (3)  

    American in Japan says

    The question remains: job destroyer or job creator?

    It seems obvious the left wing media (rolling stones) rather only focus on one or two examples yet ignore many other success stories.

    Based on their criteria one would have painted entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley as job destroyer as well since only a handful actually make it in the long run.

    Laid off around here... who hasnt been laid off, down sized, bankrupted if they worked in Silicon Valley for say the past 20-30 years. Its as common as the changing seasons.

    Overall RS takes a pretty immature view of American business. I wouldnt trust what they say.

    This is an odd statement made .."then they took profit before filing bankruptcy"... Profits ? you need more color to understand this.. and frankly its up to the Trustee to approve payments made 1 year before the filings as it relates to "related parties".

  12. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    15 threads
    2,839 comments

    67   3:25am Sat 1 Sep 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (3)  

    American in Japan says

    Tally of Job Creation By Bain Proves Vexing (Wall Street Journal)

    from the article...

    "But several other experts said Mr. Abowd's method contained its own flaws, including that it fails to account for the value of guidance offered by Mr. Romney and other Bain executives. A Romney campaign official echoed that criticism, saying the method was an "unorthodox" approach that implied every passive stockholder is a job creator, giving no additional credit to firms such as Bain that actively assist companies in which they invest."

    as such there are more than a few example right here in the Bay Area where you have firms who "take no equity position" but collect a fee to turn a company (many start ups) and mature their processes to become viable public companies.

    many start ups which are engineering centric and ignore proper selling / accounting staffing and logistics eventually "screw up royally" ... these turn around firms come in and clean things up taking some management responsibility and hire staff in order for client corporations to behave and conduct business in a mature fashion. Example .. create accurate financial statements which will pass an audit which will be used for new round of venture capital, bank lending, possible IPO, or sold to another company. The proper treatment of revenue recognition by various young companies is a big problem around here for younger industries like Electronic Gaming and Social Networking.

    Once you clean things up.. you can get funding, growth and more hirings!

  13. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    68   1:57am Mon 3 Sep 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    >Once you clean things up.. you can get funding, growth and more hirings!

    Yes, you could get more, but I doubt you will.

    Also Bain Capita; still has a majority share of Sensata :

    http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=ST+Major+Holders

    It seems obvious the left wing media (rolling stones) rather only focus on one or two examples yet ignore many other success stories.

    The Rolling Stones article is on the left but look at the others The Wall St. Journal, Rightwingnews.com, etc.

    This one at least says there isn't much way of knowing whether Bain resulted in a net gain of jobs.
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-22/romney-sheds-crocodile-tears-for-exported-jobs-o-malley-says.html

    Please provide more sources of these success stories.

  14. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    69   8:20am Mon 17 Sep 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    So far I am unconvinced..at best it is a zero-sum game and at worst, Romney has profited at the expense of the American worker.

  15. freak80


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    52 threads
    4,416 comments
    Corning, NY
    Premium

    70   8:31am Mon 17 Sep 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    American in Japan says

    Looks like Romney needed the government far more than the ave. American.

    Socialism for the rich! It's what America is all about.

  16. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    71   6:36am Thu 4 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  
  17. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    168 threads
    5,074 comments

    72   7:09am Thu 4 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    That's in the Rolling Stone. Any right winger worth his salt will tell you that therefore they get to ignore it, as they do everything else they don't want to hear.

    I thought it was interesting. Reminds me a little of some of the stunts DOnald Trump pulled earlier in his career.

  18. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    73   4:57pm Fri 5 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    True, but the Wall St. Journal isn't exactly left wing (see above).

  19. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    15 threads
    2,839 comments

    74   6:15pm Fri 5 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (3)  

    American in Japan says

    What do you all think of this story. Be specific please...

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-federal-bailout-that-saved-mitt-romney-20120829

    or was it Bank of New England... and not Bain. What BAIL OUT or a Bank Take over? Who funds the FDIC ? Tax payers, think again !

    Do you really eat up all this BS from the likes of Stephanie Cutter !
    These Obama clowns dont have a hour of business education or experience.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/did-mitt-romney-get-a-bailout-for-bain-and-company/2012/07/24/gJQAvzSh7W_blog.html

    The FDIC deals with this problem constantly when it seizes banks, figuring out how it can get the most money out of distressed loans. Changing the terms or reducing the loan is fairly typical, as the FDIC indicates in its Guide to Bank Failure.

    The FDIC’s Resolution Handbook also says (page 80):

    Restructuring a loan for a financially distressed borrower is normally more productive for the receiver than foreclosing on the collateral or initiating lawsuits to collect the debt. Maximizing recovery on failed institution assets is the receiver’s responsibility, and litigation expenses can very rapidly consume any funds recovered

    The FDIC tries to collect as much as possible, but ultimately has to make good on deposits at least up to $250,000. (In the Bank of New England case, the limit was $100,000 at the time, but the agency decided to guarantee all deposits.) But any shortfall is made up through assessments made on FDIC-member banks.

    That’s right — no taxpayer money is involved. The FDIC prides itself on not taking taxpayer funds.

  20. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    15 threads
    2,839 comments

    75   6:21pm Fri 5 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (3)  

    greedy Bain Investors.. from Unions to Oprah..

    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/look_who_parks_their_cash_at_bain_88KSQrw8BXciEidja2ZQXN#ixzz274M4g6UP

    But Bain’s private-equity executives have enriched dozens of organizations and millions of individuals in the Democratic base — including some who scream most loudly for President Obama’s re-election.

    Government-worker pension funds are the chief beneficiaries of Bain’s economic stewardship. New York-based Preqin uses public documents, news accounts and Freedom of Information requests to track private-equity holdings. Since 2000, Preqin reports, the following funds have entrusted some $1.56 billion to Bain:

    * Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund ($2.2 million)

    * Indiana Public Retirement System ($39.3 million)

    * Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System ($177.1 million)

    * The Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension System ($19.5 million)

    * Maryland State Retirement and Pension System ($117.5 million)

    * Public Employees’ Retirement System of Nevada ($20.3 million)

    * State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio ($767.3 million)

    * Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System ($231.5 million)

    * Employees’ Retirement System of Rhode Island ($25 million)

    * San Diego County Employees Retirement Association ($23.5 million)

    * Teacher Retirement System of Texas ($122.5 million)

    * Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System ($15 million)

    These funds aggregate the savings of millions of unionized teachers, social workers, public-health personnel and first responders. Many would be startled to learn that their nest eggs are incubated by the company that Romney launched and the financiers he hired.

    Leading universities have also profited from Bain’s expertise. According to Infrastructure Investor, Bain Capital Ventures Fund I (launched in 2001) managed wealth for “endowments and foundations such as Columbia, Princeton and Yale universities.”

    According to BuyOuts magazine and S&P Capital IQ, Bain’s other college clients have included Cornell, Emory, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Notre Dame and the University of Pittsburgh. Preqin reports that the following schools have placed at least $424.6 million with Bain Capital between 1998 and 2008:

    * Purdue University ($15.9 million)

    * University of California ($225.7 million)

    * University of Michigan ($130 million)

    * University of Virginia ($20 million)

    * University of Washington ($33 million)

    Major, center-left foundations and cultural establishments also have seen their prospects brighten, thanks to Bain Capital. According to the aforementioned sources, such Bain clients have included the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the Doris Duke Foundation, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Ford Foundation, the Heinz Endowments and the Oprah Winfrey Foundation.

  21. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    76   4:34am Sat 6 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    They may have made money as a benefit, but I am still not convinced that any wealth was created by Bain Capital. On principle I would have to say that I wish they had invested with another company even if it meant slighty lower gains. At least I have been reading the various links (many can't be bothered with more than short soundbites.) Someone eloquently stated that there is a difference between "entrepreneur" and "capitalist".

  22. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    77   5:00am Sat 12 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    And then there are the three large toy retailers that Bain Capital bought, leaving only Toys R Us with a near monopoly.

  23. Kevin


    Follow
    Befriend
    40 threads
    2,652 comments

    78   9:02pm Sat 12 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Why does anybody give a shit about Mitt Romney anymore? He will never have any chance at real power again, and just goes back to being a kind of douchey rich guy. There are hundreds of douchey rich guys who also don't matter.

  24. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    79   5:09am Sun 13 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Because the myths of free markets with the corporations will raise their ugly head again...and many will be deceived.

  25. Vicente


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    203 threads
    4,407 comments
    Davis, CA

    80   10:21am Sun 13 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Kevin says

    Why does anybody give a shit about Mitt Romney anymore?

    Because in every way that matters, he still represents the WORSHIP of the GOP for the FIRE gods. They will fellate anyone who has megabucks and hang on their every word. It matters not which dimwit who lucked into billions in the casino I suppose, but he is the poster boy.

  26. Kevin


    Follow
    Befriend
    40 threads
    2,652 comments

    81   12:24pm Sun 13 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    This is hardly news.

  27. CaptainShuddup


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    247 threads
    4,704 comments

    82   12:34pm Sun 13 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (2)  

    Corporate Raiders became acceptable in the 80's so the stigma that it had back then does not apply to today. Now had this been the "Good fight" for all these years, I could understand the distraction.
    But it seems to me like Romney has been singled out by the Left as the only person in History to do this. The Left went along with it in the 80's and 90's, because there were Fat middle aged experienced White guys that were getting the Job axe, and for every three of them that got fired. An inexperienced premium example of affirmative action filled their shoes for a fraction of either of their salaries.

    It was a fine example of Regan style bipartisanship that fit both agendas.

  28. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    168 threads
    5,074 comments

    83   1:10pm Sun 13 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    CaptainShuddup says

    Corporate Raiders became acceptable in the 80's so the stigma that it had back then does not apply to today. Now had this been the "Good fight" for all these years, I could understand the distraction.

    But it seems to me like Romney has been singled out by the Left as the only person in History to do this.

    No. Wrong.

    The point is that if you want to claim to be all about service to others and to the country, then that doesn't square well with having been a corporate raider in the past, which is more along the lines of just getting money for yourself and your company, totally at the expense of others.

    Americans don't have a problem with selfishness, or with doing work that has no redeeming qualities other than making money.

    But if you're running for President, it might be nice if you have a history of personal goals other than just providing for yourself and your family (without regard for who gets harmed in the process).

  29. mell


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    55 threads
    1,309 comments
    Premium

    84   1:29pm Sun 13 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    .thomaswong.1986 says

    greedy Bain Investors.. from Unions to Oprah..

    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/look_who_parks_their_cash_at_bain_88KSQrw8BXciEidja2ZQXN#ixzz274M4g6UP

    But Bain’s private-equity executives have enriched dozens of organizations and millions of individuals in the Democratic base — including some who scream most loudly for President Obama’s re-election.

    Why doesn't anybody address this instead of going "yeah, but it's still wrong and they are still jackasses!". I mean sure, if you think you made a mistake all these years then you have the right to change your mind and oppose Bain, but at least admit that you were part of the idiocy that you decry now and give back some if not all the money you made from Bain, maybe to a local charity of sorts. Hypocrites.

  30. mell


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    55 threads
    1,309 comments
    Premium

    85   1:41pm Sun 13 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    American in Japan says

    They may have made money as a benefit, but I am still not convinced that any wealth was created by Bain Capital. On principle I would have to say that I wish they had invested with another company even if it meant slighty lower gains. At least I have been reading the various links (many can't be bothered with more than short soundbites.) Someone eloquently stated that there is a difference between "entrepreneur" and "capitalist".

    I mostly agree with your assessment, but there are a lot of entities that don't produce anything and make money from it, or make far more than they contribute. If people would have been consequent they would never have invested in such a corporate raider company instead of benefiting from its profits (which is arguably some sort of profit they generated for others, but likely net it may be a zero sum at best like you said).

  31. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    86   11:26pm Tue 19 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike  

    So much for creating wealth..

  32. MMR


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    7 threads
    252 comments
    New York, NY
    Premium

    87   7:01pm Wed 20 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    FDA and it's internal report from 2007 on fulfilling it's mission: In a nutshell they can't. If anything has significantly changed in 2013, I would be happy to receive that information; having said that, I don't know that there has been any meaningful improvement in the last 6 years.

    But "they" seem to do a good job of suppressing info, as even finding this juicy tidbit was a challenge.

    AFAIK, the FDA is failing miserably in its stated mission

    http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/dockets/AC/07/briefing/2007-4329b_02_01_FDA%20Report%20on%20Science%20and%20Technology.pdf

    Nobody says

    4. FDA no longer overseas the food safety killing kids and elders who are vulnerable.

  33. MMR


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    7 threads
    252 comments
    New York, NY
    Premium

    88   7:03pm Wed 20 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Where was the FDA on this?.....Asian shrimp raised on pig feces....Has it stopped yet? Waiting on anyone who can shed light on this topic as I would hope to be better informed

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-11/asian-seafood-raised-on-pig-feces-approved-for-u-s-consumers.html

  34. MMR


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    7 threads
    252 comments
    New York, NY
    Premium

    89   7:14pm Wed 20 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    Had the misfortune of going to Emory from 1994-1998. It is a place is utterly devoid of school spirit where they were charging 8c for a pat of butter and 15c for cream cheese. This was during the Bill Chace era.

    Bain is about making money and Emory makes money off the backs of people hungry for prestige. Seems like liberal democrats and republicans like that equally.

    Being a country-fried republican at Emory: automatic outcast

    thomaswong.1986 says

    According to BuyOuts magazine and S&P Capital IQ, Bain’s other college clients have included Cornell, Emory, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Notre Dame and the University of Pittsburgh. Preqin reports that the following schools have placed at least $424.6 million with Bain Capital between 1998 and 2008:

  35. MMR


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    7 threads
    252 comments
    New York, NY
    Premium

    90   7:16pm Wed 20 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    They put money into their own pockets at the expense of destroying main street. I don't have good evidence on it, just observation. Home depot killed the neighborhood hardware store and staples killed the mom-and-pop office supply store. I suspect that they made money for their investors at the expense of the aggregate economy

    American in Japan says

    They may have made money as a benefit, but I am still not convinced that any wealth was created by Bain Capital. On principle I would have to say that I wish they had invested with another company even if it meant slighty lower gains. At least I have been reading the various links (many can't be bothered with more than short soundbites.) Someone eloquently stated that there is a difference between "entrepreneur" and "capitalist".

  36. MMR


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    7 threads
    252 comments
    New York, NY
    Premium

    91   7:19pm Wed 20 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    The people that support the party of the 'corporate raiders' (Usu republican) are also the type of idiots who need to demonstrate their patriotism by putting up a flag on the back of their car. Being a good citizen means generating something worthwhile and adding to the GDP, without parasitizing other areas of economy to do so. And paying fair share of taxes in the process.

    Rationalizing corporate raiders: not nearly as patriotic

    CaptainShuddup says

    Corporate Raiders became acceptable in the 80's so the stigma that it had back then does not apply to today. Now had this been the "Good fight" for all these years, I could understand the distraction.

  37. MMR


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    7 threads
    252 comments
    New York, NY
    Premium

    92   7:21pm Wed 20 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    Not that I'm an Obama fan necessarily, but I love people who thought Romney was a good candidate based on having 'business experience'

    marcus says

    But if you're running for President, it might be nice if you have a history of personal goals other than just providing for yourself and your family (without regard for who gets harmed in the process).

  38. MMR


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    7 threads
    252 comments
    New York, NY
    Premium

    93   7:25pm Wed 20 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Not sure that elite universities aren't parasitic in their quest for cash

    MMR says

    Had the misfortune of going to Emory from 1994-1998. It is a place is utterly devoid of school spirit where they were charging 8c for a pat of butter and 15c for cream cheese. This was during the Bill Chace era.

    Bain is about making money and Emory makes money off the backs of people hungry for prestige. Seems like liberal democrats and republicans like that equally.

  39. Vicente


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    203 threads
    4,407 comments
    Davis, CA

    94   11:20pm Wed 20 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    CaptainShuddup says

    Corporate Raiders became acceptable in the 80's so the stigma that it had back then does not apply to today. Now had this been the "Good fight" for all these years, I could understand the distraction.

    Lunch with Gordon Gekko? Sure. Hang out at his parties? Sure. Put him in the White House? Fuck no!

    There's a difference between having a secret admiration for someone whose principles you despise, and putting a sociopath in charge of foreign policy and nuclear launch codes.

  40. American in Japan


    Follow
    Befriend (28)
    149 threads
    1,398 comments

    95   1:23am Wed 3 Apr 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Good insights here distinguishing rentierism from "innovative" capitaism:

    How rich moochers ruin America (Salon.com)

    The election is over but this problem is worse than ever.

« First     « Previous comments    

American in Japan is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net  

Page took 267 milliseconds to create.