the basic asymmetry of boys vs girls is that girls have to deal with the consequences of pre-marital sex more than boys.
1. Birth control will almost always eliminate this difference. 2. It's the felony criminalization of sex between sexually mature human females and adult males that makes this a serious problem because:
a. If sex before age 18 is a criminal, only criminals will have sex with girls before age 18 and
b. even well intentioned adult fathers will often be arrested and thrown in jail and put on the sex offense registry effectively destroying his ability to provide for anyone.
3. We all live in a 1st world culture where the consequences for having a child early are ridiculously minor compared to ages past. All young mothers are fed. All young mothers are given shelter and clothing. All young mothers and their babies are given health care. All young mothers will have their children educated for free. 4. We all live in a 1st world culture where motherhood is always optional for the woman (even when 100% compulsory for the man) and getting out of the consequences of sex is as easy as abortion, adoption or abandoning your baby at a police station. 5. Our culture is so toxic to basic human drives and desires that pregnancy is viewed as a nasty consequence instead of a blessing. "OMG SHE'S PREGNANT!!!!!!! WOE TO THEE YOUR LIFE IS OVER!!!" However women in 3rd world nations (80% of the human population) celebrate pregnancy inside or outside of marriage. Paradoxically it's in 3rd world nations where there actually ARE some bad consequences for getting pregnant too early. Furthermore the young girl herself, be she 13 or 15 or 17 is glowing with happiness, feels fulfilled, and looks forward to being the best mother she can be as long as her friends and family support her. This is an important distinction because a woman who gets pregnant and is encouraged by friends and family and the media to feel bad about her pregnancy, told she should be clubbing, partying, drinking, or riding the cock carousel instead of raising her child, is going to be far more likely to put her baby in a dumpster.
The worst sectors of the worst recovery since World War II are business investment in new plants and equipment and new business start-ups. These are the biggest job creators, and their slump is a key reason for the sub-par labor recovery, with low participation rates and high involuntary part-time workers.
So if investment is the problem, what does Hillary Clinton go out and do? She proposes jacking up the tax on investment. It's almost inconceivably stupid.
This woman is dangerous, I hope she will get defeated. Kudlow is right, this is the stupidest plan somebody could ever come up with. If you want to tackle HFT, impose a fee/tax on speed-trading or even day-trading, but don't conjure up some communist scheme where you have to hold every asset 3+ years to avoid higher taxation so that people that don't make 300K / hour are getting taxed to the hilt for their skill and double-taxed for their risk-taking in supporting new investments, there will be no upward mobility left once you hit upper middle class. What a load of bull..
Thanks! Forgot about that one, great stuff. And that - next to old-school hard work and workouts - is what boys need (to be able) to do without some politically correct cunt pissing on their leg. It's part of developing manhood, develop your inner jerkboy. Then you will be loved by the ladies and not end up as a lonely depressed mass shooter.
If we insist on talking about owing a debt based on ancestry, how about this one: Africans owe everyone else a debt because their ancestors kicked everyone else' ancestors out of Africa!
How brain-dead and racist does one have to be to believe in a debt owed due to race affiliations? Shall I stop random people of a particular race on the street in run-down parts of the city to collect a debt because the welfare they receive comes from my tax money on present time basis?
Abuse my ass. The boy is only saying this because he's been told that's what he's suppose to say.
I'm guessing his mom and her lawyer told him to do so due to the pregnancy. IWOG may be able to fill us in on the paternity laws in England but if they're anything like the ones here his finances are potentially ruined for life.
And therin lies the abuse. Its not the sex that's bad its the baby making and the financial fallout. Not to mention STDs - who knows where that woman has been.
The boy, aged 15 at the time, said how the two months of abuse by Caroline Berriman, 30, of Oldham, Greater Manchester, left him ‘scarred for life’ - and they had regular, unprotected sex.
Abuse my ass. The boy is only saying this because he's been told that's what he's suppose to say. 50 times is not only not abuse, it's something the boy evidently liked a hell of a lot.
The only reason women who have sex with teenage boys are prosecuted is to preserve the illusion that when a teenage girl choosing to have sex with a man over 18 is somehow abuse. It's not. It's biology.
People over 18-years-old having sex with with 6-year-olds is pedophilia. Those people having sex with eager 15-year-olds is normal sexual activity without which our species would not even exist. We are all descended from countless generations of children produced by 15-year-olds having sex with 18 to 40-year-olds.
The government's monopoly on violence should be used to prevent rape and other violent crimes, not to cock-block teenagers from having consensual sex. Abusing this monopoly on violence only serves to harm innocent people including the "children" the government claims to be protecting. Case in point, the teenager charged as a sex offender for taking a nude picture of himself.
Such ridiculous abuses of government power will continue until the public holds the police, the judges, and the politicians responsible for these human rights violations accountable.